Talk » Sales » Discussing 'If You Can Demonstrate Market Movement With Comps: Downtown Edition'
 

SAVE    RSS If You Can Demonstrate Market Movement With Comps: Downtown Edition

<< first    < prev       793 comments  -   page of 8        next >    last >>
Ignored comment. Unhide

You have to be careful with these outliers where something sold for 30% below market. I remember tracking one down to pres at RE development company selling a unit to some other exec at same company. Why? Who knows, maybe to cheat on taxes. Say I need to pay you $200K. Rather than do so, I simply sell you one of my properties at $200K below market value. I pay no taxes because I do a 1031 exchange, and my benefit is that my basis is now $200K lower. Your benefit is that you get to defer your taxes indefinitely, and when you do need to pay, it'll either be at capital gains, or you simply move in for a couple of years to take advantage of the exemption.

Everything is fine with your little stealing until the world catches up to the fact that even at a $200K discount, the place is worth $200K less than what you paid and levered given its cash flow.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Same-unit resale of a Village one-bedroom, down about 10% from early 2008: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/440981-coop-69-west-9th-street-greenwich-village-new-york

04/08/2008 Previous Sale recorded for $825,000.
07/30/2009 Listed by Corcoran at $895,000.
10/07/2009 Price decreased by 11% to $795,000.
11/11/2009 Price decreased by 3% to $769,000.
12/11/2009 Listing entered contract.
02/04/2010 Sale recorded for $743,750.

The seller had replaced the floors and kitchen, etc., so make that more than 10%.

In January 2008, the seller also contracted to buy a $2M place at the Harrison. He closed on that a few months ago. This 9th St place may have been bought as a flip project while waiting for the Harrison to be built.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Am I the only one doing this. When I see people paying 1000psf for something so small, and hardly liveable I now run to google to see if I can figure out who the owner is. In this case, apparently a young creative type, so I can see it..I guess..as a place to live for a couple years. But this is teeny weeny itsy bitsy.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

73 Worth - 5D
SOLD
$1,687,500

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/362029-condo-73-worth-street-tribeca-new-york
04/22/2005Previous Sale recorded for $1,087,250.
11/04/2008Listed by Prudential Elliman at $2,250,000.
02/03/2009Price decreased by 7% to $2,095,000.
02/27/2009Price decreased by 5% to $1,995,000.
06/23/2009Price decreased by 7% to $1,850,000.
12/10/2009Listing entered contract.

Ignored comment. Unhide

4D buyer must be feeling pretty good about himself that he got such a "bargain." Meanwhile, you just know the developer sprinted to the bank, laughing the whole way, to cash that check for $1,500 psf.

Something tells me that the (from what I can ascertain) SF venture capitalist who bought 4D, who ranked #38 on a recent Forbes "Midas List," could probably care less whether or not you think he got a "bargain." LOL.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

Midas is pretty clearly buying a happy little pied-a-terre. I'm sure that many wealthy people care, and weep when they read this board and are told what lemmings they are for just having squandered 1% of their net worth on NY real estate.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

I don't run in the billionaires club. But, let's face it, Manhattan draws a disproportionate number of those who do.

You're close, close on the dimensions, though.

what about "perky"? ...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

242 east 25th
Not surprising, being on 2nd ave and 25th it's at the southern end of project row on 2nd ave. Though not as bad though almost as bad as project row on 10th avenue ironically with the same cross streets.

Those projects are pretty benign--mostly seniors who have lived there since they were built and plenty of the type of working families the projects were originally built for. This apartment actually looks like a decent, at $800K not almost $1MM, except for the fact that the master bedroom is just off the kitchen. Am I the only one who thinks that's a little weird.

Considering that the apt is 800sf at most, it's $1,000/sf for a shit box in the sky, er, sorry, postwar coop on 2nd avenue.

Ignored comment. Unhide

AR: Comps thread? Isn't this the bidding wars thread?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Sorry, didn't want go mess your comps thread. I expect people to have made stupid decisions on new construction in 2006. But now? What were they thinking?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Gut-renovated one-bedroom at One Fifth: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/376313-coop-1-fifth-avenue-greenwich-village-new-york

Looks as if they made a few bucks on that reno, but it took two years to unload.

02/24/2006 Previous Sale recorded for $830,000.
03/27/2008 Previously Listed by Corcoran at $1,595,000.
12/12/2008 Delisted temporarily by Corcoran. Last priced at $1,495,000.
01/21/2009 Listed by Ann Weintraub, Ltd. at $1,350,000.
08/14/2009 Delisted temporarily.
11/19/2009 Listing entered contract.
03/03/2010 Sale recorded for $1,280,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

AR: 40 Mercer #9 was marked as "Contract Signed" on January 18th.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

wow..interesting.

1/09 was after the financial melt-down definitely post re peak.

Say floor difference would account for $20K decrease. Its a relatively new building so condition differences are unlikely. Its a still a 15% decline in a year. And the tide has been turned?

Great work AR. Being basically lazy, I figure if I wait long enough AR will comp every downtown option for me.

Ignored comment. Unhide

111 Barrow Street - Same Unit Re-sale - Unit 8D
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/37025-coop-111-barrow-street-west-village-new-york
07/12/2006Listed by Warburg at $1,375,000.
08/05/2006Listing is no longer available.
08/31/2006Re-listed by Warburg.
09/29/2006Price decreased by 6% to $1,298,000.
01/19/2007Price decreased by 8% to $1,198,000.
03/22/2007Price decreased by 4% to $1,150,000.
04/26/2007Listing is no longer available.
05/17/2007Re-listed by Warburg.
05/17/2007Price decreased by 13% to $998,500.
06/12/2007Listing entered contract.
09/14/2007Listing sold. Sale Recorded at $1,020,000

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/479946-coop-111-barrow-street-west-village-new-york
11/19/2009Listed by Century 21 Clickit at $1,395,000.
12/28/2009Listing entered contract.
02/23/2010Listing sold. Sale Recorded at $1,395,000

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

Am I crazy or does $900+ seem like high maintenance for a smallish 1 bedroom in a walk up building? I pay less than $1500 for 2 beds in with full service.

Ignored comment. Unhide

liz - whoever is crazy enough to pay $475,000 for a small 4th floor walkupo apartment is what is probably a renovated tenement (oh sorry, PREWAR) building is crazy enought to pay that maintenance. It does boggle the mind.

AR, BPC has always had the most ridiculous maintenance costs which I understood were due to the land lease and PILOT. Traditionally, cots compensated to some extent to make monthly costs equivalent to other areas. Ironically, several people have told me that renting down there is a good value.

ar-thanks for this! This gives a real perspective on the market. Thank you so much for doing this. It is VERY VALUABLE!!! And very appreciated

Here Here!!! AR is an amazing resource (not to mention one cool chick).

"AR, BPC has always had the most ridiculous maintenance costs which I understood were due to the land lease and PILOT. Traditionally, cots compensated to some extent to make monthly costs equivalent to other areas. Ironically, several people have told me that renting down there is a good value."

I you think they have been high or are high now, you ain't seen nothing yet. New round of ground lease increases coming up soon.

Here's one in Chelsea -- 15% below 2006 basis for a building that has been stubborn to move:

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/chelsea-mercantile

06/29/2006 #15H $2,240,000
03/17/2010 #15H $1,900,000

There's no listing associated with either one, so it isn't clear this is an arm's length transaction. However, I suspect one of those in contract 2 bedrooms was the listing for this unit.

I see a listing on the 2006 sale: on market asking $2,250,000 4/19/2006

SkinnyNsweet: Here's an expanded history for #15H. Despite the loss on the 2010 sale, the appreciation over the course of a decade remains impressive (and a bit sobering):
12/15/2000 #15H .. $840,500
06/10/2003 #15H $1,350,000
06/29/2006 #15H $2,240,000
03/17/2010 #15H $1,900,000
The first transaction is the original sponsor sale. The next two appear to have been struck through brokers. As for the 2010 sale, the seller has owned an apartment on the sixteenth floor since 2002, so it seems plausible that he was able to find a buyer himself.

Ignored comment. Unhide

This one's interesting and sad -- it is a greater than $500k loss in two years on a beautiful, albeit cramped, apartment in the West Village, and it hasn't sold yet. I guess there could be a bidding war that turns the tide, but I doubt it given how long it has been on the market.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/maison-pierre-369-bleecker-street-new_york

04/10/2008 #4 $3,025,000 -- labeled as 4, but it was probably 4/5 based on the linked listing

12/11/2007 Previously Listed in StreetEasy, but temporarily delisted, by Corcoran at $3,295,000.
04/10/2008 Corcoran Listing sold.
12/01/2009 Listed by Brown Harris Stevens at $2,950,000.
02/08/2010 Price decreased by 10% to $2,650,000.
04/05/2010 Price decreased by 6% to $2,500,000.

SNs - I think it's actually even more interesting. The sponsor sale in 2007 preceded the flip for $3,025,000 8 months later (clearly the August 2007 listing and closing, although separate in the SE history, are the same unit).

From this perspective, the current ask (7% above 2007 initial sale) doesn't look cheap by any means, $500k loss or no. I also doubt the bidding war theory, BTW. Maybe if they cut to low 2s as a price discovery mechanism, but a 6% cut from a price that got no interest in 2 months probably isn't going to catch much attention.

04/10/2008 #4 $3,025,000 -8.2% $3,295,000 Sold 2 beds 3 baths 1,590 ft²
08/17/2007 #4/5 - $2,650,000 2 beds 3 baths 1,590 ft²
08/16/2007 #4 $2,341,975

I thought the Village/West Village were "immune" from the slump. Can't figure out what the problem was with 79 West 12th. Sounds like a nice apartment with good light, renovated, and very close to PS41. Was there just no one in the market?

As for the Bleecker St listing not sure who would want to want to spend that much money to live on a street with so much tourist congestion (Magnolia, Marc Jacobs etc). Then again I say the same thing every time I'm in Soho.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/maison-pierre-369-bleecker-street-new_york

We saw this unit -- it's essentially a duplex on the top two floors of a brownstone with a nice roofdeck. But the price was/is ambitious for what is essentially a third floor walkup. I agree that cutting it to low 2s would make it more intriguing.

^^ actually three flights up to the 4th floor.

Kiss
Was the square footage right? It looks like that total includes the outdoor space.

I didn't calculate the sq footage and didn't it on the listing, but the floor plan gives room measurements which do seem accurate from what I recall.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

55 N. Moore 4R 2,100 sf 15% up from 2007 (almost peak) price

09/26/2006 Previously Listed by Prudential Elliman at $2,400,000.
04/12/2007 Prudential Elliman Listing sold.
04/12/2007 Previous Sale recorded for $2,135,000.
05/27/2009 Listed by Halstead Property at $2,625,000.
09/29/2009 Listing entered contract.
11/16/2009 Listing sold.
11/16/2009 Sale recorded for $2,465,000.

Wasn't that unit renovated between sales, ph41?

Can't really tell - can't pull up full description from 2006 listing.

Ignored comment. Unhide

"Wasn't that unit renovated between sales, ph41?"

"Can't really tell - can't pull up full description from 2006 listing."

Ahh, the babe in woods defense.

A few things should have clued you in. First, it's the 15% price increase when 20% drops is where the market is actually trading. Sure there are outliers, but a 35% outlier is really out there. Second, the lack of pictures of words associated with renovation in the 2006/2007 listing should provide another clue. Third, the 2009 listing's use of "renovated to perfection" and "back-lit Onyx wall" should provide another clue.

Finally, having never looked for such a thing before, it took me all of 1 minute to find the website for NYC work permits, punch in the address, and find the work permit. This is the original, filed in April 2007:

http://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/JobsQueryByNumberServlet?requestid=2&passjobnumber=104743681&passdocnumber=01

Note the interior demolition, general construction, plumbing modifications, and installation of central AC system. In other words, a gut renovation. The final amendment was filed in June 2009.

Ignored comment. Unhide

inonada - my bad. I can't really use ACRIS et al that well, and didn't really care all that much.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

Just busting your chops, ph41 ;).

1 York Street "F" line. #4F closed 14.5% below same-unit prior sale and 27.3% below the peak comp two floors up. #6F was a June 2008 contract. The contract for the original sale of #4F was signed in August 2007.
-------- Recorded Sales -------- | ---------- Previous Listings ----------
04/09/2010 #4F $2,220,000 -11.0% |↓ $2,495,000 Sold 2 beds 2.5 baths 1,733 ft²
11/19/2009 #5F $2,545,625 - 9.1% | . $2,800,000 Sold 2 beds 2.5 baths 1,733 ft²
08/01/2008 #6F $3,054,750 + 0.2% | . $3,050,000 Sold 2 beds 2.5 baths 1,733 ft²
06/26/2008 #4F $2,596,537 - 7.3% |↑ $2,800,000 Sold 2 beds 2 baths 1,733 ft²
06/12/2008 #3F $2,647,450 - 1.9% |↑ $2,700,000 Sold 2 beds 2 baths 1,757 ft²
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/one-york
In the listing for the resale of #4F, the sellers offered to pay all transfer taxes. Don't know whether that offer stood for a sale 11% below ask.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Here's another one in the West Village, just listed for 4% under a 2006 price. This is a nice place and is in prime West Village. I guess you could say "bidding war", but I'm still waiting for that place on Bethune to go back into contract. Prime never goes down -- it is AAA real estate. ;)

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/514832-condo-130-barrow-st-west-village-new-york
6/08/2004 Previous Sale recorded for $750,000.
07/21/2006 Previous Sale recorded for $1,225,000.
04/18/2010 Listed by Century 21 NY Metro at $1,185,000

The renovation appears to have been done prior to the 2006 sale, which may account for the markup from 2004 to 2006.

One question: I've noticed that a number of smaller firms that are taking some listings have some of the more realistic asking prices. Is this a general phenomenon, or am I just not seeing the data correctly?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Here is prime central village -- although Kyle might dispute this -- now listed at 5% under 2005 basis:

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/516411-coop-61-west-9th-street-greenwich-village-new-york
09/08/2005 Previous Sale recorded for $1,675,000.
04/23/2010 Listed by Corcoran at $1,750,000.
05/12/2010 Price decreased by 9% to $1,595,000

Only $1029/foot + $2644/month maintenance and nobody snatched it yet? What are you people doing?

and on the second floor too. run don't walk

Its actually a really nice apartment with a sensible layout and the location is super convenient. Price doesn't seem absurd but like many combinations, the maintenance gets out of control. And the only way to overcome that is to keep dropping the price. Kyle is there any reason you wouldn't call this location "prime central Village"? When I was growing up anything between 5th and 6th aves was the "rich kids block. (Especially amusing when the bombed out their own townhouse in the 70s. Don't know what the value was then but had to have been six figures, today probably eight.) But then again we also rode our brontosaurus to school.

Oh yeah -- I think it is a nice place, too. I wasn't knocking the place -- just recording the comps.

Liz: I think Kyle has very high standards for prime. I'm not even sure he'd put Butterfield House in prime because it is off fifth.

Kyle: I'm not knocking you, it was just an offhanded comment -- because I remember your delightful and exquisitely detailed description of prime. You know the neighborhood. It was like, move 100 feet in this direction and you've got a food smell. Over here is a bus stop. etc. I think you even ranked and tiered the buildings at one point.

Well we all agree that Kyle is THE arbiter of the Lower 5th Avenue/Greenwich Village Gold Coast. And like many "experts" he actually knows what he's talking about....if I were considering that area, I would absolutely beg Kyle to review my prospective apartments and give his opinion on the price/value.

I would stick up for Butterfield House but then I'm a sucker for modernist architecture. If anyone saw the townhouse that was featured on curbed this week, many disparaging it for not being cohesive with its Beaux Arts neighbors. I was positively salivating.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Down a few bucks (3% flip tax) from 2007: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/489399-coop-55-liberty-financial-district-new-york

12/28/2007 Previous Sale recorded for $590,000.
01/15/2010 Listed by Corcoran at $649,000.
03/25/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/21/2010 Sale recorded for $602,500.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

It makes one wonder if they would not have been better off eating their downpayment.

<< first    < prev       793 comments  -   page of 8        next >    last >>