Fresh hope for StuyTown renter windfall by A. Ready | 10/20/10 - 7:45 AM e-mail talk tweet StuyTown residents woke up this morning to a rather amazing letter posted in their lobbies from city council member and co-resident Dan Garodnick. "While this seems like a never-ending saga," he writes, "[w]e have reason to be hopeful." There were plenty of interesting messages. A few highlights: •"CW... [more]
Fresh hope for StuyTown renter windfall
by A. Ready | 10/20/10 - 7:45 AM
e-mail
talk
tweet
StuyTown residents woke up this morning to a rather amazing letter posted in their lobbies from city council member and co-resident Dan Garodnick. "While this seems like a never-ending saga," he writes, "[w]e have reason to be hopeful."
There were plenty of interesting messages. A few highlights:
•"CW Capital [the current loan servicer, appointed after the default of the landlord, Tishman Speyer] has already expressed its support for doing a non-eviction conversion." Translation: It looks like renters will be able to continue renting, and those wishing to buy will likely be given the opportunity. (Cue champagne corks.)
•"[A]ny successful plan will have to be a good deal for the tenants, and will have to protect renters who decide not to buy." Translation: Monthly carrying costs (mortgage, maintenance, taxes) will need to be roughly equivalent to current rents.
•"[W]e will work directly with CW Capital toward a negotiated outcome of all issues--including the claims in the Roberts v. Tishman Speyer case, which still entitle many tenants to considerable damages [for rent overpayments]." Translation: Someone who has been overcharged by $2,000 a month for four years could be due $96,000--or more if the courts determine damages should be trebled.
Related posts:
WINDFALL!! A look at StuyTown's proposed insider prices
StuyTown auction (and windfall dreams) delayed
[less]
