All fights between nyc10022 and someone else should just be here
Started by anonymous
over 16 years ago
Discussion about
Maybe we can clean up some of the discussions which get into fights between nyc10022 and someone else, usually where he calls the person a liar, repeatedly. So if you are about to get into a fight with nyc10022, post it here. This will remain open indefinitely, and may even always appear on the front page of Streeteasy.
Then afterward we can sit around sipping tea with our pinkies out and say pleasant and agreeable things all afternoon.
ranter, hilarious. And yes, I get sucked in by his ridiculous vitriol and outright, ahem, lies, way more than I should. What do you say nyc10022, can we just keep it here?
Only if bjw keeps all his lying here. I know that will be hard, there are so many of 'em.
You know, wouldn't it be better if, well, bjw just didn't lie to cover his agenda?
wow, its been 6 minutes and even the hall monitor can't even keep his promises. He tries to keep it going... and, yelling "liar".
http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/11678-why-dont-more-people-live-in-brooklyn?last_page=true
Wow, I'm not surprised! Pathetic.
At least we've proven the truth about the tourist.
The other thing I was thinking about suggesting would happen is that nyc10022 would call me or someone else a hall monitor. Too bad I didn't post it as my prediction, but ... there you have it.
I think Alan's comment was funnier. What would I do at work all day without the vitriol of streeteasy? My job?
here's the first time he called someone hall monitor
http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/5831-toren-ads-resorting-to-prayer
Ranter, don't generalize. Its bjw I call the hall monitor (and with very good reason, check out some of the hypocrisy). And with the exception of Boerklyn (who just lied about me)... I don't think I've called out any major lies except for bjw's in quite some time.
Yell at me all you want, but get it right please. ;-)
I did think Alan's post was funny....
> here's the first time he called someone hall monitor
correction "here's the first time he called bjw hall monitor "
ok, who's next!
Somebody say "there is no decline!"! Quickly! Alpine, what you got?
nyc10022, the L, I, E, S keys on your keyboard must need more regular tuneps than the rest. Repeating the word doesn't mean it's true - you know that right?
alanhart, I think we should begin by commenting on the weather, followed by an exhaustive discussion on courtly etiquette (ie: the antithesis of some of these threads).
Wow, and he's still going!
http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/11678-why-dont-more-people-live-in-brooklyn?last_page=true
Not only did he keep going, he's trying to call me out for NOT RESPONDING>
Well, I guess we now have proof who the putz is.
Thanks, bjw, I couldn't have proved it any better myself!
Pathetic, tourist...
"nyc10022, the L, I, E, S keys on your keyboard must need more regular tuneps than the rest. Repeating the word doesn't mean it's true - you know that right?"
Of course, but doesn't mean it isn't true, either, grasshopper.
You think that if you lie enough, they cancel each other out or something?!?
ROTFL.
"an exhaustive discussion on courtly etiquette" and right about when that topic is exhausted, xxxxxxxxxxxx will say something, and then I'll have to pull my very favorite Alice Roosevelt quote* and then we'll be back to StreetEasy-normal.
* "If you can find nothing nice to say about a person, come sit here next to me."
Or something to that [great] effect.
It's actually a bit pathetic that you report what's going on on other threads here. Strange habit.
More importantly, I would love to hear you actually respond to what I wrote, but you doggedly avoid it at all costs. It's quite peculiar, esp for someone who's clearly not lacking for nasty words.
sad, sad, sad, bjw.
At least the truth is out.
"Ranter, don't generalize. Its bjw I call the hall monitor"
More bs (ahem, LIES) from nyc10022: http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/6389-barrons-nyc-luxury-prices-could-drop-25
I'm working on having nyc10022 removed.
alanhart, nyc10022...are both terrific..i enjoy their posts..nyc has great ideas and is always kind.
julia, you're either a saint or you didn't read bjw's thread link.
brokelyn, bad idea. and won't fly with the SE people. put 10022 on ignore if he bothers you. my life has been immeasurably enhanced by the ignore button. but to say that you think you or anyone else should determine (with a few exceptions related perhaps to threats) who posts here is just not appropriate.
alanhart frequently brings me to the verge of hysteria, but only in the best of ways.
> More bs (ahem, LIES) from nyc10022: http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/6389-barrons-nyc-
> luxury-prices-could-drop-25
BJW, more reading lessons for you!
Today you learn the difference between past and present tense!
Then tomorrow you can start your geography lessons!
> It's actually a bit pathetic that you report what's going on on other threads here.
Wouldn't be bjw without some hypocrisy!
I love it!
btw, I love that the newbie suddenly thinks he runs the place. Sounds familiar....
And you're going to report me for what... saying things like...
"Not a very good comparison, but not surprised coming from someone who sounds like his IQ is roughly 40."
Oh wait, that was you.
kylewest said it best...
> brokelyn: you are like the new village idiot on here, aren't you?
nyc10022 isn't in the remove category, may be in a couple other categories but not that one. Kind wouldn't exactly be an accurate description to use either, but I think julia may be referring to someone else.
bjw2103 on the other hand has always been a pleasant contributor, but no matter what he posts, it results in vitriol from nyc10022.
All those bulls do love each other. Misery loves company, I guess.
;-)
This personal attack stuff should stop.
In the absence of differing opinions we end up just confirming each others BS.
We need the trouble makers or the site is worthless.
nyc10022...sorry you have to contend with this. Keep poking the crowd.
Thanks, falco.
nyc10022, you seem to have mellowed a bit. i find myself enjoying a number of your posts. could you explain your virulent hatred of bjw? i was pretty pissed at ericho for the trans fats out my ass reference, but i was still able to engage without utter ranting (after a fashion). did he kick your dog? spit in your mama's face? do you want to be an ebutterfly? not a goal. if you can, let it go. if you can't, explain it with some rationality. not just he lies, because that could be subjective and plenty of people here do not speak the truth. frankly, i find bjw much more credible in your interchanges than you.
although i agree entirely with falco on the general issue of threads attacking people. uncalled for. inappropriate. and 10022, it's not that i don't appreciate your posts. many of them i do.
Its actually less the lies - which I agree are common here - but more the hypocrisy. Few folks have made more complaints on this board, and in pretty much all cases, its for things he does repeatedly.
I agree I've come back harder in recent posts, but bjw can't pretend he hasn't gone after me unprovoked in the past. These days, I feel like hitting him twice as hard as he hits me, thats all.
If thats my worst sin, I'll take it.
> although i agree entirely with falco on the general issue of threads attacking people
Interestingly enough, a thread just like this one is actually the source of a good amount of what I'm thinking about in terms of bjw...
nyc10022,
Don't argue with lots of people she disagrees with bjw2103 because he lies and portrays he received the word from the penatuch and saw visions in the eifle tower of the agendas he portrays as fact.
Mutumbo, I should just let you make the case for me...
nyc10022,
I did make a valid point. Thnx.
mutombo, wow, that was indecipherable. i haven't had the experience, i don't hang on the boroughs threads, and was just wondering. the attacks seem inordinate, but if there's something i don't know, that's why i was asking. on the non-borough threads, well, it seems as if things are overheated.
could you add some puncuation, just so i might be able to tell if you're saying it's lots of people i disagree with?
Actually, I thought about it some. If I do have to pick a worst sin, its taking the bait.
But, hell, what they hell else are we here for?
Generally, I find the folks who say "I'm here to educate others" have the worst information of them all. I'm not going to name names right now...
no, 10022, i take the bait often as well (and not with the greatest results often). it's just that you seem to look for bait. but, as you say, open and even negative discussion is discussion, and what we are here for. was just curious.
AR, as I always said you are good in my book the same with nyc10022.
I know W'Burg very well and things I have said came to pass in W'Burg re: squatting, bjw2103 disputed squatting will take place in W'Burg, check this out:
http://curbed.com/archives/2009/06/01/reader_rant_williamsburgs_squatters_row_has_got_to_go.php
This is not the only squatting story out of W'Burg, the Rocket Bldg had squatters and did not pursue legal action because they did not have a certificate of occupancy.
bjw2103, will cut off the nose in spite the face and will spend more time trying to bolster up W'Burg with additional lies. He puts W'Burg on a pedestal but will bash a host of other neighborhoods that are similiar to W'Burg such as DUMBO. He is the hall monitor for W'Burg.
While in the same breath trying to claim he's just trying to keep other conversations 'fair'.
As mutombo has alluded to, the hypocrisy goes back a long ways...
bjw2103,
Will be here to say this story is untrue.
http://curbed.com/archives/2009/06/02/curbedwire_partial_building_collapse_on_burgs_n_1st_street.php#reader_comments
"no, 10022, i take the bait often as well (and not with the greatest results often). it's just that you seem to look for bait."
Could just be the history. Many "new" threads are just old discussions started again, and I don't really separate.
But there has been a host of huge bait as of late... one long time bull just did a "what happened to all those people saying end of the world" kind of thread.
Huge bait, and, yeah, I took it. But why else we here?
And, I should add... I'm also a popular target. Yes, I'm partially responsible for that, but there are a lot of folks who have frustrations they need to take out, and I'm an easy target (by choice).
bjw2103,
How dare you post a thread link from 6 months ago. You truly, need a life.
*****CORRECTION*****
Pentateuch
10022, i am guilty myself.
"one long time bull just did a "what happened to all those people saying end of the world" kind of thread."
Who was that?
> 10022, i am guilty myself.
Oh no, are we group hugging?
nah, i'd still probably kick you rather than hug you :).
Fair enough.
(bending over)
"bjw2103 on the other hand has always been a pleasant contributor, but no matter what he posts, it results in vitriol from nyc10022."
"i find bjw much more credible in your interchanges than you."
nyc10022, we've obviously had our difference, and you certainly don't hold back on the insults and outright misrepresentation of my positions, but isn's this enough to show you the error of your ways, when two of the more respectable posters on this site are calling you out?
"Few folks have made more complaints on this board, and in pretty much all cases, its for things he does repeatedly."
As I've said before, I will hold your feet to the fire when you make dubious claims. That doesn't mean I'm always right, but it doesn't demand the vitriol you spew in response.
"but bjw can't pretend he hasn't gone after me unprovoked in the past."
I'll admit, in the last few days I have, but this has been stewing for a long time, mostly as a result of your unprovoked insults. For a long time, I've really tried to be civil with you, but you've made it impossible.
"Don't argue with lots of people she disagrees with bjw2103 because he lies and portrays he received the word from the penatuch and saw visions in the eifle tower of the agendas he portrays as fact."
mutombo, you've proven to be one of the most incoherent posters here, and I don't mind answering your questions, but your constant antagonizing isn't going to win you too many favors, capisci?
"bjw2103 disputed squatting will take place in W'Burg, check this out:"
See mutombo, this is what I mean - that's essentially a lie. I've never even addressed the issue because it's something I don't know much about. If you want to instigate, try somewhere else.
"He puts W'Burg on a pedestal but will bash a host of other neighborhoods that are similiar to W'Burg such as DUMBO."
Again, an unfounded statement, but if it really pleases you to think so, so be it.
"How dare you post a thread link from 6 months ago. You truly, need a life."
Where, dude? What a crock.
aboutready, JuiceMan, much thanks for the support. You have been two of the better posters on this site, hands down.
bjw2103,
You were doing so good for seven weeks (not putting your foot in your big mouth) now you have succumbed to your usual garbage.
I saw aboutready mention me. I meant to post the other day when it was her birthday. What a whore. 71 years old. And she has a teenage daughter? How did that happen? If maybe she would back off her stupid love love love pretend east village ultra liberal crap with a side of piss off crabbiness to make it seem like she has personality and is tolerable, then maybe, maybe, she'd be tolerable if then her next step would be to dump mimi the foreigner, columbiacounty to 71 year old lonely man from the catskills, ... shall I go on? Oh, jasonkyle, how are you lately, how was vacation?
oh the beauty is back. i love it when you show your true colors. no, please don't go on, piss off.
mutombo, I have to wonder how much time you spend worrying/thinking about me on a daily basis. I suppose I should be flattered, but it's just creepy. Please bugger off.
bjw2103,
I really feel sorry for you the gov't should bail people like you out.
bjw2103,
about 15 hours ago
ignore this person
report abuse "Ranter, don't generalize. Its bjw I call the hall monitor"
More bs (ahem, LIES) from nyc10022: http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/6389-barrons-nyc-luxury-prices-could-drop-25
"How dare you post a thread link from 6 months ago. You truly, need a life."
"Where, dude? What a crock."
bjw2103,
I can't make this stuff up. Stop being so naive Frenchy.
EButterflies - What's wrong with you? I'm no fan of aboutready's "liberal crap" either but your last comment was way out of bounds. Really bad form.
nyc10022 is an idiot...there..that does it.
AboutReady, columbiacounty, NYC10022, 64WhoreStreet....they're all here to serve one purpose.
To destroy American values.
These hard-nose bear get on here and applauds foreclosure, bankruptcy, financial meltdowns and misery of others. The absolute low life of our society.
{ UpUpAndAway passes out on the barstool }
rofl
mutombo, that wasn't exactly a random posting, was it? Sorry you're offended by someone posting a link, but you really shouldn't be so sensitive. Instead of following me around, maybe you should consider a new hobby?
"I really feel sorry for you the gov't should bail people like you out."
Please don't feel sorry for me, I'm doing fine thanks.
UpUpAndAway and EButterflies apparently had a very late night. Remember, that last drink is for right now, but the internet is forever.
"liberal crap" and "applauds...misery of others" interesting.
what's this preoccupation with the working girls?
I have to agree with AR here. I can't recall anything that bjw has posted that merits this level of vitriol from mutombo and nyc10022.
bjw2103,
Random posting, offended and sensitive you are so delusional and referring to yourself. Doing fine Hahaha.
Never trust a lawyer...or their partners.
Anyone find it interesting that AR is married to a lawyer?
i find it interesting that AR is married to a lawyer, but i'm not sure why anyone else would.
other than the obvious fact that i should be far more self-centered and less concerned about the little people, because a bank rebound would be lovely for our family income level.
Thanks divvie. Some people just need to vent over the internet I guess, but it's strange to invest so much anger in posts directed at one person. In fairness (if that's even the right word here), nyc10022 does it to a several people (some of whom are occasionally asking for it, I'll admit), but mutombo seems to have developed a real love for me - I only wish I could return the favor.
"Anyone find it interesting that AR is married to a lawyer?"
No - it's weird that you do.
bjw2103,
"mutombo, that wasn't exactly a random posting, was it?"
I did not ask you a question, I made a statement about your character. "How dare you post a thread link from 6 months ago. You truly, need a life."
YOUR RESPONSE was "How dare you post a thread link from 6 months ago. You truly, need a life."
"Where, dude? What a crock."
"bjw2103
about 18 hours ago
ignore this person
report abuse "Ranter, don't generalize. Its bjw I call the hall monitor"
More bs (ahem, LIES) from nyc10022: http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/6389-barrons-nyc-luxury-prices-could-drop-25 "
You're talking about someone following you around you searched for a thread started by nyc10022 six months ago that had no activity for six months but I'm following you get real little guy.
hyprocrisy & delusion what you live by.
mutombo, you know there's a search function, right? I typed in those two words and found that thread in a matter of seconds. It's really bizarre how much that bothers you. I usually don't stoop down to name-calling here, but you've earned it - you're truly an idiot.
bjw2103,
You are truly an idiot as I said and you agreed you searched for the thread, not matter how you slice it you searched for a thread that is six months old. It does not bother me at all but it is bizarre how you rant and rave someone is following you and you clearly admitted to following nyc10022.
You do realize mutumobo don't you that you don't come across very well at all?
mutombo, fortunately there's a difference between typing in a search term (what I did) and constantly addressing something like 80% of your posts on this site towards one person (what you do).
divvie,
And you do?
bjw2103,
You are psthetic.
I love it, I can't post for a couple days, come back, and there, still arguing on the thread about me... is bjw. I'm not sure he even noticed I was gone, he just kept posting (like on the other thread).
Surprised there is still anyone out there wondering why bjw is (also) always in fights...
REMINDER, all fights with nyc10022 go here.
Ironically, bjw says he'll abide, and then starts them elsewhere... and then gets into fights with OTHER people on this thread.
Can't say I'm really surprised.
"I love it, I can't post for a couple days, come back, and there, still arguing on the thread about me... is bjw. I'm not sure he even noticed I was gone, he just kept posting (like on the other thread).
Surprised there is still anyone out there wondering why bjw is (also) always in fights..."
nyc10022, that's pretty laughable. What are you implying? That I can't post while you're "gone"? I was completely facetious about keeping my discussions with you to this single thread - that clearly wouldn't make any sense, and you're again failing to recognize the OP poking fun at your rampant antagonism. The only other posters on your level are mutombo and petrfitz - I really don't have a problem with anyone else. aboutready said it best: "frankly, i find bjw much more credible in your interchanges than you."
And when are you going to address the EddieWilson issue you've lied about and ignored at all costs whenever anyone brings it up? Your credibility is shot, unfortunately.
nyc10022, the dude bjw will not abide
Please remember to have your fights with nyc10022 here.
excellent, that's just what they'll be expecting
reminder
reminder
reminder
how dare nyc10022 defend Hitler in the Deutsche Bank thread.
Alpine can't really read, so not sure this is going to stop him. He already started two threads on me today.
Alpine is The President
nyc10022 is EddieWilson
Stevejhx
UGH, for crying out loud, can we also move all the fights with aboutready here?
i certainly wouldn't mind it.
ladies and gentlemen: for the thousands in attendance, and the millions watching around the world.....lets get ready to rummbbbbbbbbbbblllllle!!!!!!
although, what does it really matter? how long does it take anyone with half a brain to figure out that a thread is full of venom.
i don't know what i think about my focal point, but i think an active and vocal commentary is only to the good. feel free to use the ignore.
That's for sure aboutready. As soon as a thread involves you, it's going one of only a few directions. Either you are entitled to something. Or you are angry at someone. Or there's a lie involved.
and what happens when you join a thread?
before or after you?
before.