Skip Navigation

Sale at 250 East 87th Street #3C

Started by looking2return
over 17 years ago
Posts: 182
Member since: Jan 2009
Discussion about 250 East 87th Street #3C
Huh? $575 down to $565 and contract same day, and now $650. Even better is the description (in the floorplan pfd) describing the "Pleasant street view" which is of 86th street. 04/09/2009 Listed in StreetEasy by Edwards & Noble Property at $575,000. 04/30/2009 Price decreased by 2% to $565,000. 04/30/2009 Listing entered contract. 06/06/2009 Re-listed by Edwards & Noble Property. 06/06/2009 Price increased by 15% to $650,000.
Response by evnyc
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1844
Member since: Aug 2008

But they have to get the money back that they put into it, right?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 17 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

evnyc it looks like it never sold. Fell out of contract. Not uncommon these days. Financing still prohibitively difficult. Give the market correction some time. Prices climbed steeply for six years. You can't expect correction in six months.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Trompiloco
over 17 years ago
Posts: 585
Member since: Jul 2008

It's pretty strange. The OLP was pretty attractive and the unit went in contract within a month. I have no clue who they're trying to kid with the increase. A property that falls out of contract is already "tainted" to a certain extant because it didn't have a second offer to fall back to when the buyer failed to close, and that was at its OLP.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by urbandigs
over 17 years ago
Posts: 3629
Member since: Jan 2006

my bet is board turndown

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by evnyc
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1844
Member since: Aug 2008

Oh, I don't expect the correction to happen in six months, AR. I sometimes worry that it will pass me by. If it was a board turndown, maybe it was because the sale price was "too low" and that is the reasoning behind the raise in price?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sidelinesitter
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1596
Member since: Mar 2009

Five weeks seems short to know the board outcome, but I guess the process would vary quite a bit from building to building. Of course if the board just sent a message to the parties along the lines of "don't even bother submitting a package at a price like that", you could get to an outcome pretty quickly.

Recall that UD, whose bet is board turndown, has an in-contract listing in this building that has been discussed on this board, so he may be in the flow of the right rumor mill.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ncy10025
over 17 years ago
Posts: 198
Member since: Feb 2009

yes but why the increase in price --they get a minor uptick in traffic for a few months and they think the parties back on! -- dont' think it will sell at 650K.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by julia
over 17 years ago
Posts: 2841
Member since: Feb 2007

the increase in price is when buyers offer $565k the sellers will get what they originally wanted and not have to negotiate from a starting point of $565k. I'm in sales (not real estate) and I always start at a high point knowing it will be negotiated down.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Pette78
over 17 years ago
Posts: 42
Member since: Aug 2008

Would a board really turn down a sale in this market because the price is too "low"? Seems short-sighted on the board's part to leave inventory outstanding in the building given the undeniable downturn.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sidelinesitter
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1596
Member since: Mar 2009

Pette - I agree with you, but people who (claim to) know something about the process have discussed the "price too low" question a few times on SE in recent months and quite a few seem to think that boards have both the latitude (legally) and in some cases the inclination to "protect value" through turndowns. That said, I do not recall anyone citing a specific example of it happening, which may tell you something about how real the issue is or isn't. Also, I didn't mean to suggest that low price was the only possible reason for a board turndown. Buyer financials or some other issue could also explain it, if indeed UD is correct in the first place. I just used the hypothetical of a low price as an example of how you might get an answer in an unusually brief time.

On price, who knows? This is asking 32% off the last sale comp in the line (up from -40% previously), so it isn't crazy to think that there could be interest. Trompilico's point about taint seems right and should cap the price at or around the previous ask/contract level, but it only takes one buyer. Previous discussion from April is here:

"250 East 87th, Apt. 3C. Just listed at $575K, or $523 per alleged sf.
http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/403849-coop-250-east-87th-street-yorkville-new-york

7C closed for $957,500 last June, so the listing price on 3C is a full 40% lower. A couple of qualifications, though. The apartment (at least the LR end) is above a busy intersection on 86th Street, so 4 floors of elevation probably counts for a lot here. Also, 7C has a small balcony while 3C does not, although this may not be a very valuable attribute on a low-ish floor above this intersection. Condition could also be a significant factor, with the listing for 7C claiming mint renovation and 3C described on the broker's sheet as "functional condition", whatever that means. Clearly not a clean comp, but -40% does get ones attention as a starting point."
http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/7617-if-you-can-demonstrate-market-movement-with-comps-upper-east-side-edition?page=4

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment