Skip Navigation

S&P Has the Audacity to Put Detroit, Phoenix, and NYC RE Markets on the SAME List!

Started by The_President
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009
Discussion about
5 Housing Markets That Have Further to Fall 1) Detroit Housing prices fell 4.9% in Detroit in March, according to the latest reading of the Case-Shiller Index. That marked the city’s largest monthly decline since January 1991, when S&P’s backlogged data begin. Houses in Detroit are currently selling at 1995 prices – and with prices still falling so fast, it’s hard to say when the city will... [more]
Response by The_President
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009

first off, this article uses S&P as it's source and we all know that they have no credibility left. And second, waht the hell are NYC, Detroit, and Phoenix all doing on the same list? In no way shape or form is the NYC RE market as bad as the ones in Detroit and Phoenix. Thoughts?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 17 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Case-Shiller is just predicting those five cities have further to fall. That's all putting them on the same list meant. Case-Shiller didn't say NYC was as bad as Detroit and Phoenix. Nor did they say NYC ever would be be. Just further to fall.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

> In no way shape or form is the NYC RE market as bad as the ones in Detroit and Phoenix.

Yes, its worse.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by The_President
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009

why don't you just shut up and stop making bone headed comments liek that? In Detroit, houses are being sold for $1. Please find me a $1 apt. in Manhattan if our market is worse.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by The_President
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009

I'm still waiting

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 17 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

first off, this article uses S&P as it's source and we all know that they have no credibility left

Actually the article is referencing Case Schiller data which is clearly the best source out there, unless you need to go way back in time. In that case you would use OFHEO data.

Article scores points for throwing water on claims made by national association of realtors which is really a lobbyist/promoter of real estate brokers. S&P analysts are stating valid reasons.

As far as S&P credibility, with regards to rating asset backed securities, I would agree, with regards to the comments in this article, I don't see them as lacking credibility. S&P is a large company that does many things.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by The_President
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009

where are you nyc10022? Why do you keep posting dumb comments and then run off?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

"why don't you just shut up and stop making bone headed comments liek that? In Detroit, houses are being sold for $1. Please find me a $1 apt. in Manhattan if our market is worse. "

Alpine, you can't just wait, you have to actually go to class. In 3rd grade, they might teach you what the word "decline" means.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by The_President
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009

come on, post a $1 apt. Mr. "Manhattan is Worse than Detroit."

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 17 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

Detroit, houses are being sold for $1 must be talking about this
https://www.carletonsheets.com/success-stories-lp-video.php?mb=ES01BD&kw=real%20estate%20tax%20liens

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

Alpine, post a $60 trillion manhattan apartment, mr "manhattan is not down 20%".
Come on, I'm waiting.

(yes, as illogical as your request)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

and I'm still waiting for you to explain how 100 minutes is less than 2 hours.

Waiting, waiting...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

sorry, correction

100 minutes is "over 2 hours"
- alpine

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by The_President
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009

as I said before, when I went out there, the trip took me over 2 hours.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

> as I said before, when I went out there, the trip took me over 2 hours.

Idiot, you can't include the time you tried to board the hot dog cart and it didn't move.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment