Skip Navigation

NYS Biggest Income Decline in US

Started by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008
Discussion about
Crain's just published the stat on biggest income declines by state, as measured by withholdings in the first half of the year vs. last year. We're down 15%, tops in the nation (US average 8%) (print version from last week)
Response by JuiceMan
about 17 years ago
Posts: 3578
Member since: Aug 2007

Is this a 15% decline in incomes or a 15% decline in withholdings? Both would be significant but have different implications.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

"as measured by withholdings "

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

i also worry about this less from an "everyone's income is going down" front, more from a "and we thought state government looked like morons before".... imagine them trying to deal with a 15% budget cut (when 2% nearly killed them).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by notadmin
about 17 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

so if it's measured by withholding, this drop is not taking into account those that are self-employed?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by tenemental
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1282
Member since: Sep 2007

Admin, yikes.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by notadmin
about 17 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/magazine/07unemployed-t.html?pagewanted=all

"New York City has more than its share of the self-employed: 720,000 in 2004, representing 16 percent of the city’s work force, according to the federal Bureau of Economic Analysis."

thought about the obvious freelancers, real estate brokers, interior designers... but forgot the yoga instructors, fitness gurus, personal chefs... you can tell i'm not hip.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Jazzman
about 17 years ago
Posts: 781
Member since: Feb 2009

Self employed pay quarterly taxes - one would assume that "withholdings" would include these payments - no???
Still though - this should be no surprise to anyone - we go lower from here.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Fluter
about 17 years ago
Posts: 372
Member since: Apr 2009

Jazzman, either way this ain't looking good.

I remain bearish.

Have you noticed all the press reports (NY Times yesterday biz section) that ultimately say things like, "Such and such indicator is up, but all these other indicators are down, therefore things are not so bad"?

A lot of people are in denial, which in the buy-and-spend world is not necessarily a bad thing.

But--yikes.

{Manhattan real estate agent.}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by notadmin
about 17 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

meanwhile the aging process is hitting us in earnest. for the 1st time i've seen SS in red by 2013. nice to have a safety net that depends on economic growth. what kind of risk management is that? if things are good you could get a SS check and a job. if things are bad, none. lol.

ideally, society should have set apart $ anticipating for the bad consequences of aging like 30 years ago, while the demographic wave was having a nice impact (discretionary income 3 times as big as now, a family could be supported on 1 income and the other could have been 100% saved for the old age). using surpluses for current spending was a nonsense. anyway, we will see what price society will have to pay for the "don't plan and hope for the best" mentality.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

oh it's called playing with other's monies.... should've seen me with my job/bank's credit card. : )

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by notadmin
about 17 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

lol 67th, what's your plan if taxed to oblivion?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment