Skip Navigation

(BN) FHA Shortfall Seen at $54 Billion May Lead to Bailout (Update2)‏

Started by marco_m
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008
Discussion about
FHA Shortfall Seen at $54 Billion May Lead to Bailout (Update2)2009-10-08 19:48:42.891 GMT (Adds comments from FHA head starting in third paragraph,lawmakers in fifth.) By Jody ShennOct. 8 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Housing Administration,which insures mortgages with low down payments, may require aU.S. bailout because it has $54 billion more in losses than itcan withstand, a former Fannie Mae... [more]
Response by Riversider
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

The government agencies have assumed credit risk beyond epic proportions. A good reason why the credit exposure should have been born by private institutions.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Fluter
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 372
Member since: Apr 2009

I resume my bearishness. [growl]

Thanks for sharing. I guess. The truth will set you free, but first . . .

{Manhattan real estate agent.}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malthus
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1333
Member since: Feb 2009

Deja vu all over again. This is the front page of today's Times as well. Maybe all those reports of a national housing recovery were a bit premature, based in part on 3.5% down loans to uncreditworthy buyers.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

The commentary I read best was how the gov't is trying to use low down payment mortgages to prop up the housing market. If the FHA is processing more loans with the same staff they had before the crisis, they are clearly not doing the same due dilligence(Hey will anyone notice if we put 1% scrapple in the meatballs?)

Reminds me of what happens if you build a house using cheap concrete for the foundation.....

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

peterfitz and steveF , what are your thoughts here ?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

allow me to answer for them:

"I've never seen a penis used to hold up the RE market that I thought was too hairy or too stubby"

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

i was wondering what was holding it up

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

I believe it is the refractory period, with no Viagra and extendze in sight.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment