Sale at 220 Riverside Boulevard #29-A

the brokers for 29-A felt that the language used to market 29A insufficiently captured the grandiosity of the unit, clearly the only reason it failed to sell quickly at the higher price.

http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/394269-condo-220-riverside-blvd-lincoln-square-new-york
03/23/2009 Listed in StreetEasy by Corcoran at $6,995,000.
05/29/2009 Price decreased by 6% to $6,600,000.
09/02/2009 Listing is no longer available.

Schadenfreude

right. i held a gun to this person's head and said buy or i'll pull the trigger. and nowhere do i indicate that this person will be selling at a loss. there is no indication that this price is lower than the initial purchase. in fact, i'd suspect it is higher.

and aren't you the one who thinks those who face foreclosure have only themselves to blame because they were not prudent enough?

And by never before, the agent means not in the last 30 days. It's a bit silly.

It sold for $3.14M in 2003: http://a836-acris.nyc.gov/Scripts/DocSearch.dll/Detail?Doc_ID=2003070300382001

The craftsmanship, quality and detail must've been added later.

And is mortgaged for $3.3M.

the banker that lend 107% on that thing should have his nutz or ovaries removed.... we tried taking away their bonuses that got us nowherezville.

That lender probably worked for Citigroup. Yikes on earnings today.

"The craftsmanship, quality and detail must've been added later."

NWT, missed that earlier. hilarious.

"The craftsmanship, quality and detail must've been added later."

NWT, missed that earlier. hilarious.

"The craftsmanship, quality and detail must've been added later."

NWT, missed that earlier. hilarious.

"The craftsmanship, quality and detail must've been added later."

NWT, missed that earlier. hilarious.

it wasn't THAT funny.

my computer is possessed. or SE is possessed. i only hit the button once.