How Moody's got its staff to AAA not ready for prime time mortgages.
Started by Riversider
about 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
http://www.kansas.com/514/story/1016924.html Control Fraud anyone? Where is William Black? WASHINGTON - As the housing market collapsed in late 2007, Moody's Investors Service, whose investment ratings were widely trusted, responded by purging analysts and executives who warned of trouble and promoting those who helped Wall Street plunge the country into its worst financial crisis since the Great... [more]
http://www.kansas.com/514/story/1016924.html Control Fraud anyone? Where is William Black? WASHINGTON - As the housing market collapsed in late 2007, Moody's Investors Service, whose investment ratings were widely trusted, responded by purging analysts and executives who warned of trouble and promoting those who helped Wall Street plunge the country into its worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. "The story at Moody's doesn't start in 2007; it starts in 2000," said Mark Froeba, a Harvard-educated lawyer and senior vice president who joined Moody's structured finance group in 1997. "This was a systematic and aggressive strategy to replace a culture that was very conservative, an accuracy-and-quality oriented (culture), a getting-the-rating-right kind of culture, with a culture that was supposed to be 'business-friendly,' but was consistently less likely to assign a rating that was tougher than our competitors," Froeba said. Moody's was spun off from Dun & Bradstreet in 2000, and the first company shares began trading on Oct. 31 that year at $12.57. Executives set out to erase a conservative corporate culture. In the 1990s, Sylvain Raynes helped pioneer the rating of so-called exotic assets. He worked for Clarkson. "In my days, I was pressured to do nothing, to not do my job," said Raynes, who left Moody's in 1997. "I saw in two instances - two deals and a rental car deal - manipulation of the rating process to the detriment of investors." McCleskey testified before the House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Sept. 30 and described how he was pushed out on the heels of the people he'd hired. "One hour after my departure, it was announced that I would be replaced by an individual from the structured finance department who had no compliance experience and who, to my recollection, had been responsible previously for rating mortgage-backed securities," McCleskey testified. His replacement, David Teicher, had no compliance background. SEC documents describe him as a former team director for mortgage-backed securities from 2006 to 2008. [less]
Add Your Comment
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
Most popular
-
47 Comments
-
17 Comments
-
139 Comments
-
35 Comments
-
23 Comments
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
The fourth estate has certainly let us down in this crisis....
Where were they back in 2000?
chatting amongst yourself again?
yawn, another borong Riversider post. Oh, and I already read a similar article on Huffington Post. So there is no need to copy and paste all day long. People are capable of finding articles on their own.
By Erik Larson
Oct. 19 (Bloomberg) -- A U.S. judge refused to dismiss a
lawsuit accusing the rating companies Moody’s Investors Service
Inc. and Standard & Poor’s of giving advice that caused investor
losses on subprime and other asset-backed investments.
U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin in New York rejected
the ratings firms’ arguments Oct. 15, forcing them and Morgan
Stanley, which was also sued, to respond to fraud charges in a
class action by investors claiming the raters hid the risks of
securities linked to subprime mortgages.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/20/AR2009102000035.html
I like Simon Johnson, but he doesn't really discuss how government by bestowing an oligopoly fostered the problem. The bestowed them a privilege without downside risk... Best we can do now is to treat Moody's like KPMG. They don't even fear getting sued under the current system and claim, "freedom of the press".
You often hear critics of government talk about how much better the private sector is at . . . well, just about everything. One common claim is that private corporations are better managed because of some combination of internal meritocracy, shareholder pressure and the profit imperative. This was the basis for Ross Perot's 19 percent of the popular vote in 1992 and the political careers of Michael Bloomberg and many others. However, this tenet of anti-government rhetoric suffers from a big problem: Many private corporations aren't very well managed, either.
still chatting away....
Actually, I rather agree with Riversider's approval of Simon Johnson, and his assertion that many private corporations aren't managed very well. Problem is that instead of fostering competition, we've now created a system that rewards poorly managed companies, as long as they are very, very large.