Skip Navigation

76 Madison Park...thanks for screwing the rest of us

Started by patient09
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1571
Member since: Nov 2008
Discussion about
Looks like the developer finally said "get me out" This is a pretty nice conversion on the corner 29th & Madison. Most occupancy took place in 2007. 6/19/2007 #2B $1,452,000 10/24/2008 #3B $1,475,000 05/29/2007 #4B $1,715,000 03/07/2007 #6B $1,450,000 02/28/2007 #7B $1,514,000 06/29/2009 #5B $950,000
Response by frederic12
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 50
Member since: Feb 2008

I don't understand. What is happening here?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

p09, do you have a link for the building? i'm not finding it.

frederic12, what is happening is that early buyers in new developments are getting well and truly screwed when the developer decides to unload the last few units at firesale prices.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by patient09
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1571
Member since: Nov 2008
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by frederic12
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 50
Member since: Feb 2008

where can i find the new listings? streeteasy only shows 1 listing

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

The one listing for 4A and the seven in-contracts are all resales. The sponsor has sold all 31 apartments, with 5B being the last to go.

The 31 went for a total of $60M, while the 2005 plan called for $56M. Got lucky on their timing. The buyers, of course, didn't, but them's the breaks.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by patient09
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1571
Member since: Nov 2008

NWT: nice detective work.
5B will still prove to be a tough comp.
Now, lets roll that to a larger, successful conversion. Say you have 150 units. then dump the last 10. that will sure leave a mark on resales and put even more pressure on the mega new developments currently starting to feel the pain. We might look back in a year and realize that the developer was a genius in dumping 5B and moving on.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Yeah, dumping it made much more sense than holding out or putting a tenant in. After all, no reason for the sponsor to attempt to prop up resales. Once we do start seeing closed resales there, the $950K won't look at all bad.

And then, too, they didn't really "dump" it. It was what it was worth in 2009.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9911
Member since: Mar 2009

What was special about 4b?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Nothing that I can tell. It's listed as 15 square feet larger than 3B and 5B, with 2.56 PCI rather than 2.53, but the A and C lines don't vary between the floors.

Maybe 4B retained some fancy details, as in a boardroom or president's space, from when the building was offices.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9911
Member since: Mar 2009

Could it have been the "model" apt?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9911
Member since: Mar 2009

Nevermind, I think I found the answer: the last asking price on 5b was $1,775,000. the other B lines sold earlier. Was probably just the result of "natural" price increases along the way.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by positivecarry
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 704
Member since: Oct 2008

What's the big deal about selling the apartments for what they are worth today? Why can't people be labeled what they are? If you bought in 2007, after a 100% increase in the past couple of years, you're a sucker. Same for people buying financials today. If you needed a place to live and put down a big deposit, kudos. If you're treating this apartment like a stock, you're an ass.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment