Tell me again, why are we saving the banks?
Started by OnTheMove
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 227
Member since: Oct 2007
Discussion about
http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/462831-condo-30-east-85th-street-upper-east-side-new-york Based on what I can glean from ACRIS, #5E, 30 E. 85th sold for 755K in 2000. The buyers had a mortgage for approximately 50% of the purchase price (~$371K). It's a 2 br, 2 ba 1250 sq ft apartment. The buyers seemed to use their apartment as an ATM, taking out a series of mortgages on the property and... [more]
http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/462831-condo-30-east-85th-street-upper-east-side-new-york Based on what I can glean from ACRIS, #5E, 30 E. 85th sold for 755K in 2000. The buyers had a mortgage for approximately 50% of the purchase price (~$371K). It's a 2 br, 2 ba 1250 sq ft apartment. The buyers seemed to use their apartment as an ATM, taking out a series of mortgages on the property and consolidating the various mortgages into a $1.5 M BOA mortage in 2007. This spring, the apartment is placed on the market at a pie-in-the-sky asking price: 03/06/2009 Previously Listed in StreetEasy by Prudential Elliman at $3,495,000. 08/05/2009 Prudential Elliman Listing is no longer available. 09/15/2009 Listed in StreetEasy by Corcoran at $3,485,000. 10/31/2009 Price decreased by 14% to $2,999,000. Just this September, between price chops, BOA gives the sellers another $180k to play with, despite the owners being more or less under water (notwithstanding the crazy asking price). I thought the craziness was over, but apparently I'm mistaken. Or am I missing something? [less]
that's impressive. did you check and see if the owners also own other property in the city?
Sorry Tandare, but no. I don't want to feel like I'm stalking the owners! I just came across the apartment listing and looked up its history in ACRIS to get a sense of the circumstances behind the insane pricing.
"OWNER WILL CONSIDER ANY REASONABLE OFFERS!!"
$450,000. That is about what it's worth based on comparable rents.
We are saving the big banks so Geithner has a place to work after he leaves Treasury.
Oh, Riversider! Geithner has NEVER worked at a bank.
Unlike, say, Paulson.
He will. He's clearly earned it after changing the AIG/Goldmna from 60 cents on the dollar to 100 cents on the dollar.
"after changing the AIG/Goldmna"
He did it to prevent a bailout of Goldman, as well. Which is why their bonuses are obscene.
You seem very much to have a political axe to grind; I think you need to step back, click of Larry Kudlow, watch Steve Leisman, who is, in fact, an economist.