Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Walk Away From Your Mortgage!

Started by pitchfork
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 37
Member since: Sep 2009
Discussion about
NYTimes is officially endorsing walking away. This might not be relevant for NYC NOW but it might be when prices fall another 20-30% http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/magazine/10FOB-wwln-t.html "There are two reasons why so-called strategic defaults have been considered antisocial and perhaps amoral. One is that foreclosures depress the neighborhood and drive down prices. But in a market society,... [more]
Response by somewhereelse
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

Well, Morgan Stanley did it. If its good for the banks, lets do it back to them!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

me likie.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by freewilly
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 229
Member since: Sep 2008

The next trend will be buying back your mortgage at a deep discount after forclosing - much like what the developers are trying to do at Warehouse 11. That would be truly "strategic".

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pitchfork
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 37
Member since: Sep 2009

I believe most homeowners who are (or near) underwater including those in NYC believe (hope?) that they will recover their equity soon. But given the economy, bubble prices, and the insignificant correction we have a long way to go. Walk away as the banks do.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

pitchfork, if it were an "insignificant" correction, then why would so many homeowners be underwater? I don't know how you can call what's happened insignificant.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

This would be a good article if the writer had only admitted right up front that walking away from one's mortgage in New York state is not the clean break that it is in other states like California and Nevada: New York is not a "non-recourse" state, and the bank, after selling your foreclosed property can (and most certainly WILL) sue you for the difference.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by apt23
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2041
Member since: Jul 2009

Gary Barnett, the head of Extell, walked away from a $84,000 personal loan commitment (apparently strategic default) - a mortgage on a property he was personally accountable for. I wonder if there was any repercussion. Doesn't seem the press ever went after him.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pitchfork
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 37
Member since: Sep 2009

"pitchfork, if it were an "insignificant" correction, then why would so many homeowners be underwater?"

The correction is insignificant for NYC so underwater owners are mostly those who bought the last 2-3 years.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pitchfork
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 37
Member since: Sep 2009

"New York is not a "non-recourse" state, and the bank, after selling your foreclosed property can (and most certainly WILL) sue you for the difference."

Whatever. NY is a single recourse state and the lender can either foreclose or sue not both and WILL certainly NOT sue given the magnitude of owners underwater.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

pitchfork, your statements just don't jive. How could owners be underwater if there hasn't been a major correction? It doesn't make sense. Unless you think only something like 70% would be "significant." I don't think that'll happen.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pitchfork
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 37
Member since: Sep 2009

bjw2103 you are incomprehensible

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

pitchfork, not sure what's so difficult to understand. You're saying that two things have happened: 1) many owners are underwater, and 2) there hasn't been a significant correction. One can't really happen without the other. In other words, you take out a mortgage, and if the property value doesn't change all that much, how can it all of a sudden be less than your mortgage? You need at least 10% down in this city, and in most cases 20.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

" One can't really happen without the other. In other words, you take out a mortgage, and if the property value doesn't change all that much, how can it all of a sudden be less than your mortgage? You need at least 10% down in this city, and in most cases 20."

Here's how it can happen:

You lose your job. You max out your home equity when your savings runs out. The value of your home drops just 5%.

Voila. You're now underwater.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

Suze Orman,

Promotes walking away from mortgages underwater while on Larry King. I was shocked.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Goldie
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 182
Member since: Apr 2007

Matt, you are totally clueless, New York lenders cannot foreclose and then sue the homeowner for the difference. You have confused non-recourse with "one-action." New York is a "one action" state, which means the lender must choose between foreclosing or suing the owner for the entire amount of the debt, they can't do both. And it's very time-consuming and risky to sue, lenders have far too many hurdles to make it worthwhile.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

A mortgage is a collateralized loan. If it IS underwater and they won't go after your assets or you don't have any they can touch....NO BRAINER. Do you think the wealthy approach this any differently?

That said, if you cannot handle the debt load, do not assume it!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

Suze Orman,
Promotes walking away from mortgages underwater while on Larry King. I was shocked.

Don't be she's a shameless self promotoer. Her FICO scores got many people into trouble thinking they were rich, when they were not.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by UWSer
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 158
Member since: Feb 2009

What about your credit? An ability to buy a home sometime in the future again for a non-double digit interest rate. My job ran a credit report before hiring me.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

UWSer.
That's part of the equation. Compare the temporary loss of credit against the underwater equity.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

There are many things you can do to improve a tarnished credit report. Just listen to Suzie Orman!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

NYCMatt, sure, but I'd call 5% significant. The point is, I don't know how someone can say there's been no significant correction here. That's ludicrous.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by drdrd
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 1905
Member since: Apr 2007

I understood him to mean that there was no positive "correction", no increase in prices.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sjtmd
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 670
Member since: May 2009

Buy anything you want for any price by borrowing as much as you want. Have no intention to pay the loan back. When you tire of your purchase, walk away without remorse or consequence. The developers and sellers love you. The real estate agents and mortgage brokers get their commission. Taxpayers get to underwrite the whole process. Criminal bonuses from criminal financial entities provide fuel to the fire. And we get to talk about the future of the real estate market. What a country.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

It's amazing how late to this story the NY Times is. Strategic defaults have been going on for some time now and have been well documented.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by spinnaker1
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 1670
Member since: Jan 2008

Out of 30,000 Mnh sales from 06 to 08, what's the guess on percentage currently underwater? I don't have the breakout but for argument sake lets say condo vs. coop is a 50/50 split. Likelihood of smaller dp and drop in market value that would put an owner underwater today is condos. Likelihood of additional heloc activity to pay for funky new modern furnishings and a summer share in the Hamptons is more likely in condos, as coops require additional equity at time of purchase and everyone knows coop owners already have a place in the hamptons.

Would it be 5k, 10k? Now how many out of that number are willing to bear the consequences of walking away? If they walked and destroyed their credit would any landlord in the city rent to them?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

Studies show it takes about a five year period for owners to get attached enough to their homes to the point they are less inclined to do a strategic default. For a non-investor primary residence purhcased in 2006, if they don't exercise a put this year, the default risk due to being underwater will largely have passed. Defaults for them would more likely be a function of being able to carry the mortgage.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

"Studies show it takes about a five year period for owners to get attached enough to their homes to the point they are less inclined to do a strategic default."

You're also less inclined to do a "strategic default" if you're UNEMPLOYED and have nowhere else to go.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

Riversider,

Thnx.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pulaski
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 824
Member since: Mar 2009

"Let the house go back to the lenders. The bank will throw the mortgage in the garbage. Reality will return. Prices will fall – perhaps dramatically. Systemic mortgage debt in the United States will be reduced.

Default is now a patriotic duty. It is a courageous intelligent act. Take the right steps so we can beat the Chinese. We need the jobs. We need to get back to work. We don’t need the phony debt issued to buy a bubble.

The government has screwed up management of the financial crisis by granting debt assets special status. What the owners of debt assets deserve are losses. It’s time for the people to fix the financial crisis."

http://newobservations.net/2010/01/12/default-is-a-patriotic-duty/

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

Wow and I get to live rent free for eight months!!

http://www.youwalkaway.com/index1.php

If you are facing or considering foreclosure, you're not alone.

Ask Yourself...

* Are you stressed out about your mortgage payments?
* Are you having trouble deciding if it makes financial sense to walk away?
Click for our walk away interactive calculator.
* What if you could live payment free for up to 8 months or more and walk away without owing a penny? Click to find out how we can help you.


Unshackle yourself today from a losing investment and use our proven method to Walk Away.

If you QUALIFY for our plan:

Your lender WILL NOT be able to call you in attempt to collect!

Your lender MAY NOT be able to collect any deficiency or loss they may receive by you walking
away! (Select states only)

You CAN stay in your home for up to 8 months or more without having to pay anything to your lender!

You may even be able to have the foreclosure REMOVED from your credit!*

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

Well, at least it's nice to see that there's some help for those of us on MAIN STREET.

Washington seems to only care about bailing out Wall Street.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

Lenders and borrowers need to wake up to the fact that a mortgage is a put with the borrower controlling the option. Absent a gov't entity buying mortgages at irrational prices the result of the market pricing in the put option will be lower LTV limits on loans. 80% LTV may not be conservative enough and we may well see the market moving to a 70%. Right now the single biggest threat to housing is that home owners have no skin in the game and are now waking up to the fact that their most rational choice in many cases is handing the bank the keys to the house.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a93abcea-1fe7-11df-8deb-00144feab49a.html

“The biggest problem is trying to convince myself it is not morally wrong to walk away,” she says. “I’m approaching my home as an investment that went bad. I’m not stealing anything, the bank will get the property. But my parents raised me to be responsible.” She has decided the “responsible” thing for her to do is get out of the flat and rent somewhere else for less than the $1,200 monthly mortgage payments.

In the meantime, Ms Gaughen is waiting to hear from her bank, Bank of America. She has hired You Walk Away, a company that offers legal advice, tracks the documentation process and lets people know how close they are to eviction.

You Walk Away estimates that she can live in the apartment without paying the mortgage for 12-16 months, leaving her with a nest-egg of cash at the end. Jon Maddux, chief executive, says the time people can stay has been steadily growing. His company, which charges a flat fee of around $1,000 for its services, started just over two years ago. At that time, most of his clients were extremely agitated and phone calls were often peppered with tears, Mr Maddux says.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pulaski
over 15 years ago
Posts: 824
Member since: Mar 2009

"Mortgage Applications Plummet To 13-Year Low As Tax Cuts Expire"

There was a spike in purchase applications in April, followed by a decline to a 13 year low last week. As Fratantoni noted: "The data continue to suggest that the tax credit pulled sales into April at the expense of the remainder of the spring buying season."

http://www.businessinsider.com/mortgage-applications-plummet-to-13-year-low-as-tax-cuts-expire-2010-5

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pulaski
over 15 years ago
Posts: 824
Member since: Mar 2009

"Owners Stop Paying Mortgages, and Stop Fretting"

"A growing number of the people whose homes are in foreclosure are refusing to slink away in shame. They are fashioning a sort of homemade mortgage modification, one that brings their payments all the way down to zero. They use the money they save to get back on their feet or just get by.

This type of modification does not beg for a lender’s permission but is delivered as an ultimatum: Force me out if you can. Any moral qualms are overshadowed by a conviction that the banks created the crisis by snookering homeowners with loans that got them in over their heads."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/01/business/01nopay.html

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pulaski
over 15 years ago
Posts: 824
Member since: Mar 2009

Mortgage applications decline 35% in the last four weeks.

"Purchase applications are now 35 percent below their level of four weeks ago, as homebuyers have not yet returned to the market following the expiration of the homebuyer tax credit at the end of April,%u201D

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/06/mba-mortgage-purchase-applications_09.html

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 15 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

This is the negative side of the home buyer tax credit and ref-burnout. Our political leaders would be wise to not react.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pulaski
about 15 years ago
Posts: 824
Member since: Mar 2009

"BofA unexpectedly exits wholesale mortgage market"

"Local mortgage brokers caught totally unawares; departure of second such huge lender leaves big gap."

"The move came as a surprise to local mortgage providers who did business with the Charlotte, N.C.-based bank. It means that mortgage brokers and their clients will have one less option when they are looking for a loan to buy a condo or co-op in the city."

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20101005/REAL_ESTATE/101009928

Ruh-roh.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by broadwayron
about 15 years ago
Posts: 271
Member since: Sep 2006

"I’m approaching my home as an investment that went bad."

Well, if it was a mortgage for your primary residence, then, that's just stupid; and you essentially lied when you applied for the loan. Sounds like an idiot- first-time-buyer.
If it was for an "investment property", then that's a fair conclusion.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
about 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

OH NO! NYC RE NEVER FALLZ?!!!!! and how CAN foreclosures affect "city" kids IF IT DOES NOT OCCUR? OMFG, someone IS lying to me.....

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20101004/REAL_ESTATE/101009958

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pulaski
about 15 years ago
Posts: 824
Member since: Mar 2009

"Is HR3808 The Equivalent Of TARP 2 And Obama's "Get Out Of Bail" Gift Card For The High Frequency Signing Scandal?"

"( ) virtually every single foreclosure in the US in the past several years is under question, with the impact on mortgage servicers (who just happen to be the TBTF banks) could be just as dire as the fallout from the credit crunch, it appears that the get out of jail card for the banking syndicate has once again materialized ( ) "

HR3808 "if enacted, could protect bank and mortgage processors from liability for false or improperly prepared documents. In other words, with one simple signature Obama has the capacity to prevent tens of billions in damages to banks from legal fees, MBS deficiency claims, unwound sales, and to formally make what started this whole mess: Court Fraud perpetrated by banks, a legal act, and to finally trample over the constitution."

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/hr3808-equivalent-tarp-2-and-obamas-get-out-jail-gift-card-high-frequency-signing-scandal

Wow....

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mets2009
about 15 years ago
Posts: 87
Member since: Oct 2008

Maybe I can use this argument come tax season. Federal, state and city taxes are too high so I just won't pay. Somehow, I think I'd end up in jail.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pulaski
about 15 years ago
Posts: 824
Member since: Mar 2009

"Pre-foreclosure notices soar in NYS"

"State banking department cautions that the reporting system is too new to draw many firm conclusions on the data; nearly 30% of troubled loans are less than $100K."

"Queens, with 15,184 filings, maintained its seat as the county with the state's second highest number of pre-foreclosure filings for owner-occupied 1-4 family properties. Suffolk County was hardest hit, with 19,880 filings. It's not surprising that Queens represents 11.3% of all notices sent in the state, because it is home to a number of neighborhoods like St. Albans and Jamaica, which have become known as ground zero for foreclosures in New York City."

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20101007/REAL_ESTATE/101009886

This is good news! Cheap housing in NYC coming up. You just need to gentrify Jamaica. :/

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pulaski
about 15 years ago
Posts: 824
Member since: Mar 2009

"We Now Have A De Facto Moratorium On Foreclosures, As Citi And Wells Are Set To Freeze"

http://www.businessinsider.com/we-now-have-a-de-facto-moratorium-as-citi-and-wells-are-set-to-freeze-foreclosures-2010-10

See, I knew this would happen. So now, IF I can get a loan, chances are I will never have to pay it back and the bank will never foreclose on me. FREE HOUSING!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by notadmin
about 15 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

with banks not having to foreclose... who pays the property taxes and the maintenance fees?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
about 15 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

In co-ops, the bank is responsible for paying the monthly maintenance. That's the reason for the "recognition agreement" signed at the closing.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by columbiacounty
about 15 years ago
Posts: 12708
Member since: Jan 2009

Garbled as usual.

The recognition agreement obligates the coop to inform the bank of any unpaid fees before initiating foreclosure proceedings to collect those fees. At that time, the bank can elect to pay those fees to avoid the coop foreclosing.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bgrfrank
about 15 years ago
Posts: 183
Member since: Apr 2010

If you walk away from your morgage and the banks walk away from your savings account, an eye for an eye just isn't worth it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by notadmin
about 15 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

and the property taxes during the foreclosure limbo?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment