Skip Navigation

Chicago and NYC were 2 of the 3 largest price decline cities in the most recent Case Shiller report...

Started by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008
Discussion about
what do both cities have in common?
Response by WinstonNYC
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 31
Member since: Jan 2010

price declines?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Finance?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

pizza?
hot dogs?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mimi
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 1134
Member since: Sep 2008

Rufus.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by gatornyc
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 293
Member since: Jun 2009

one is actually the alias of the other?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

I never understood Chicago's relationship to pizza. Isn't it on a lake?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

Third cousin, twice removed.
Pizza is their name for a casserole -- it's not actual pizza.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

I think the answer is they have too much in common for NYC residential to still be priced 3-4x Chicago.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

for starters...both have RE markets that were built around a core of finance jobs which has been shattered...granted chicago's much more so than NYC's...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

for starters...both have RE markets that were built around a core of finance jobs which has been shattered...granted chicago's much more so than NYC's...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

for starters...both have RE markets that were built around a core of finance jobs which has been shattered...granted chicago's much more so than NYC's...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by JuiceMan
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 3578
Member since: Aug 2007

Here is the most recent report. Says -7.1% YOY for NY which would be around the average. Where do you get top 3?

http://www.standardandpoors.com/indices/sp-case-shiller-home-price-indices/en/us/?indexId=spusa-cashpidff--p-us----

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Do we have to debate the details of the NYC metro decline when it was always the bulls/apologists/dreamers who never wanted to accept the data as relevant to Manhattan and LI City.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

Chicago's been much harder hit and it started before Lehman.
In '07 I remember some nice new construction high rises having difficulties available at 350-400 psft.
Some really good and abundant restaurants, variety of venues (but substancially less than NYC though all other cities as well)
Even more a union town than NYC, and a lot more corruption believe it or not.
Unbearably cold though, november thru march is a ghost town.
Unparalleled chopped salads, but godawful pizza.
And since Michael Jordan's retirement, an absolutely miserable place to be a home team sports fan.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

Chicago's waterfront is unbelievably impressive. Lake shore drive is full of modern luxury highrise apartments. And once it wins the 2016 olympics bid, there will be even more new buildings.

But what about NYC's waterfront? To say the least, it's downright pathetic. There are massive housing projects in lower east side, next to the east river. and the rest of the waterfront isn't as nearly as nice as Chicago's.

Again, Chicago has proven itself to be a superior city through innovative urban planning and architecture. NYC has a lot to learn from Chicago.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

juiceman..look in the nov/ oct column. thanks for the link though.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

the cbot / cme dirves chigago RE. i was talkin to treasury trader yesterday and he told the floors have dropped more than 60% employment and those jobs are gone permanently. only a tine percentage has moved "up stairs". and they also have a msssive condo oversupply of inventory. just like fidi and the ues. again I make my statement that the RE market is gonna get crushed.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Chances are homes may just be places to live for 15 years. The American Dream was a big pump and dump.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by JuiceMan
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 3578
Member since: Aug 2007

"Do we have to debate the details of the NYC metro decline"

Only when people make up numbers, mislead conclusions, and fabricate truths but other than that no.

"juiceman..look in the nov/ oct column."

So your conclusion drawn from the nov / oct delta is what? Think hard before you answer (or just look at the sept / oct column for a hint).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kspeak
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 813
Member since: Aug 2008

Alanhart, go back to Chitroit!

Although Chicago does have better-looking women. NYC girls are ugly and annoying. Chicago also has better street fairs.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Juice, in the last couple of months, we've had confirmations that values are down 25%-30% from industry players...as well as confirmation that rents are back to 2000 levels.

I am sure sure about this Chicago debate. Don't the markets tell you which more people on average find more appealing?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

The waterfront is valuable and should be utilized effectively. I hate how ugly the east river waterfront is, with views of housing projects and other ugly eyesores. Chicago has successfully developed its long waterfront, so now it's full of luxury condos, navy pier, etc.

It would be nice to see NYC follow Chicago's leadership in this area. Don't hold your breath though.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

alanhart

Agree with a lot of what you say, though the waterfronts are apples and oranges. I think following Hong Kong's lead is more likekind and comparable.

kspeak
Agreed, especially if you like blondes. Black women are much prettier there as well.
But Chitroit? Nah, Chicago and Detroit do not belong in the same sentence, let alone the same word.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

NYC is disgusting. Garbage piles up in front of so called luxury condos, meanwhile Chicago continues to dominate architecture and new skyscrapers.

Chicago has put up more skyscrapers than NYC and has overtaken NYC.

New Yorkers feels like they are the world's most enlightened citizens who enjoy paying $5000 a month for a 3 bedroom in Murray Hill.

What a joke. And NY's public transportation system is mediocre at best compared to Chicago.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

Posted this on another Chicago thread;

truthskr10
about 3 months ago
ignore this person
THe Chicago Tribune building is one of my favorites. I do love the bi level streets as well,something New York sorely needs. And the chop salads in most of their restaurants are great.

But it is so unbelievably cold, the cops are most certainly the mafia,and the unions run everything else. That thing they do to the water on St Paddy's Day is quite creepy too."

However, the vibe from the volume of people that live here is unparalleled in any city in this country. Chicago, LA, Miami, you may get it in bits and pieces over 5 ten blocks in an area but that's it.
Only other place that compare to NYC that you get that same vibe that I've been to are Paris, London, Hong Kong, and Rio.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

juiceman..ur scaring me now. for NY..sept/ oct was -.2..then oct/nov is -1...a full 80 bps worse. you have a very bad case of black knight syndrome

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Right its always funny when cities like Chicago or Boston are compared to New York...compare New York to global cities...however, for some of the same reasons, it seems like New York pales when it moves up to that bracket.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

When I look at the plethora of new developments that have sprung up in the city in the last few years, I am thoroughly embarrassed. The condos are mostly bland, ugly, and dull. Instead of majestic works of architecture, most of these condos are low and mid-rise boxes, conversions, and even the highrises are lacking in aesthetics.

NYC is about a decade behind cities like Hong Kong and Chicago when it comes to innovation and originality. Those cities are building superior condos. Just compare Chicago's elysian hotel condos, aqua, park hyatt, or lincoln park 2520, to NYC's new condos. It's not even close. Chicago just blows NYC away.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by corlearshook
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 44
Member since: Apr 2009

Seems like everyone forgets why all the projects are clustered around the East River. I do not think anyone wanted to build and/or live in luxury high rises on the East River waterfront when it was an inaccessible wall of piers with 24/7 activity.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

alanhart
The skyline is pretty but there is also more space between the buildings to admire or put attention to the facades.
Cost of land and air is a factor, at least 3x as much in NY vs Chicago. Squeezing out every drop of livable square feet makes the outside of the building suffer.

Of course not every Chicago building is perfect, that building by wacker drive on the opposite side of the water with the open 8 or 10 stories of parking is still crooked. The one that was in the movie where the car goes over the edge (Sharky's Machine maybe?). I think the architect commited suicide over that.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

ah, rufus isn't a good look for you. kind of like pastel polka dots.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by BobBorger
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 6
Member since: May 2009

All real estate is local, very very local. Although it make for an interesting national data discussion, Case-Shiller does not count/consider/track coops, condos or new developments in NYC. So perhaps it is not a very valuable sales indicator for apartments in our area. http://bit.ly/cRjEWh

In my opinion, a better indicator of 4Q 2009 residential apartment sales for these types of properties can be found for Manhattan, Queens and Brooklyn http://bit.ly/ape3nE.

To fully disclose, I am a buyer's broker for Prudential Douglas Elliman. Other reports you may want to consider are: Corcoran and Brown, Harris, Stevens for Manhattan and Brooklyn and Halstead Properties for the Q4 Manhattan data. ( I attempted to give links for these but was not allowed to because "You probably included too many links in your comment."

And since Sales and Rentals are inextricably linked, you may want to examine the Elliman rental report as well as the City Habitats report (Ditto for these links

PS. I like NYC pizza better!

Bob

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

I was kind of hoping others would post their own very favorite ever rufus (et alia) moldy oldies. Oh well.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

i'll confess i had a good one in mind, but i became frustrated trying to find it.

very nice compilation. but sadly those responding to it weren't capable of enjoying it fully.

i do miss the guy.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

> Rufus.

You beat me to it...

Alan, I was going to post some rufus, but I got thrown by you appropriating my chicago pizza line... (although my original was lasagna)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by The_President
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009

"Here is the most recent report. Says -7.1% YOY for NY which would be around the average. Where do you get top 3?"

NYC was one of the top 3 for month-over-month declines. For year over year declines, NYC is no where near the top 3. Prices in NYC have fallen much less than in most parts of the country, especially compared to FL, CA, NV, and AZ.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by shyam
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 18
Member since: Oct 2009

what was the mom decline in new york?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

It was -1% overall and -1.2% in the "high tier" of the market. The following site has the data under the "Data Downloads" section. Just hit cancel when prompted for a username/password:

http://www.macromarkets.com/csi_housing/sp_caseshiller.asp

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

chicago and NY continue to lead the decline for december as well..down .6 and .5 respectively.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jasonkyle
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 891
Member since: Sep 2008

gayle is here and oprah is there

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

> NYC was one of the top 3 for month-over-month declines.

Funny, just 3 days ago you were denying the severity...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Hugh_G
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 223
Member since: Aug 2009

"NYC girls are ugly and annoying."

I resent that scandalous remark! NYC women may be annoying, and they are disease-ridden sluts, but they aren't ugly. I won't have it!

Just standing up for your honor, ladies.

Cordially,

Hugh G. Rection

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Hugh_G
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 223
Member since: Aug 2009

By the way, YOU'RE WELCOME!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

NYC girls are annoying, yes. But thats part of what makes 'em so hot.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Hugh_G
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 223
Member since: Aug 2009

"NYC girls are annoying, yes. But thats part of what makes 'em so hot."

Indeed. So WHAT if one-in-four of 'em have herpes? Of course, when you consider that the rate of STD infection in those gals over 60 or under 17 is probably nil, and its more like one in two of women of datable age. :@/

Annoying, disease-ridden sluts indeed. But not particularly ugly.

(Hugh still observes a strking lack of GRATITUDE on the part of the NYC wimmen whom he staunchly defended}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

nyc girls are great..let get some focus back here. nyc and chicago continued the lead down for december

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by clemencedane
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 15
Member since: Feb 2010

If you think NYC women are bad, you should see the men. Sounds like everything about Chicago is better...except the location. I'll leave that to you non-coastal types.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment