Skip Navigation

FT: Morgan Stanley defers 60% of bonuses

Started by KISS
over 15 years ago
Posts: 303
Member since: Mar 2008
Discussion about
Morgan Stanley has sought to pre-empt new rules capping cash pay-outs on Wall Street, deferring 60 per cent of employees’ 2010 bonuses. The announcement came as the bank reported a higher-than-expected 88 per cent jump in fourth-quarter profits in spite of a fall in fixed income trading revenues. Proponents of deferred pay argue the practice can help dissuade bankers and traders from taking... [more]
Response by w67thstreet
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

Looks like green turds for Marco, the hand model living in LIC upper east. Hey did ya bank the $15k tax credit? Get yourself a nice 4% mortgage. Excellent! Mission accomplished Bernie.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sledgehammer
over 15 years ago
Posts: 899
Member since: Mar 2009

What is the bonus made off? Bank stocks?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
over 15 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

hahahahah..just stay on the west side princess

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

Made up of coop shares

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malthus
over 15 years ago
Posts: 1333
Member since: Feb 2009

I believe that all the Euro banks are already there due to the new rules.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

I don't think the re bullz not in banking understand the complete and utter shock this is to the hotshot I banker on the street. The dream, well not so much a dream more like a 50/50 shot was the chance that a new and coming bank (Santander, TD, SocGen, Deutsche) would buy out an entire group to bulk up whatever area was hot. Like mbs, technology banking, or derivatives.

This 60 deferred creates a new 'calculus' in the minds of almost all bankers. The fact this new 'reg' is global in nature is even worse. FLMAOzzzzz.

No need to bid against the 24 inch dick 25 yr model humping phantom banker. Flmaozzzzzz

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
over 15 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

'No need to bid against the 24 inch dick 25 yr model humping phantom banker. Flmaozzzzzz'

What a relief...that dude has been kicking my ass (sorry, azz) for 25 years.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by memito
over 15 years ago
Posts: 294
Member since: Nov 2007

A friend who works at GS said that some left work early in tears after receiving little to no bonus...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by TripleP
over 15 years ago
Posts: 127
Member since: Dec 2008

I'm expecting some ugly numbers myself next week, but the leaving in tears bit is hard to understand. If you haven't figured out that you are supposed to live only on your base salary (and saving to boot) at this point, then you don't deserve a bonus. That was mean, but seriously. People in finance live so far outside their means its ridiculous.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
over 15 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

I hate to inform all of you but the bonus money is already hitting the streets.
I know quite a few in retail who are experiencing the Jan. bonus bump which has been absent since Jan. 2008. The trickle begins. Those walking out of GS with no bonus work very close to the door.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rangersfan
over 15 years ago
Posts: 877
Member since: Oct 2009

my third cousins sisters brother just saw a bunch of ibankers from gs and ms in the tenefly, nj costco loading up on cases of meow mix. heard there was a bidding war for the last few cases. another report from teaneck has teary eyed gs employees looking to trade interests in their unvested shares for firewood and cooking oil.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lornek
over 15 years ago
Posts: 23
Member since: Nov 2010

TripleP, bonuses are part of people's compensation on Wall Street. Wall Street prosperity isn't up because base salaries are up if total comp is down.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by TripleP
over 15 years ago
Posts: 127
Member since: Dec 2008

Thanks, lornek, but I work on Wall Street. And I never claimed prosperity was up simply b/c I have a higher base than 2 years ago. I think it will be years before we can reach pre-crisis comp levels.

But I have limited sympathy for my colleagues and peers at other banks who are in denial that most of our bonus comp will be deferred and highly variable for years to come. Most of my peers in finance live lifestyles that cannot be sustained on base salary comp alone. And in my view, we had a few years to adjust to the new regime.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lornek
over 15 years ago
Posts: 23
Member since: Nov 2010

Didn't ask for sympathy.

Surely your colleagues have savings though, and deferred comp is still an asset even if you want to be conservative about it and apply a hefty haircut assuming downside risk.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

The thing the bulls keep forgeting to mention is... even if salaries were up the same amount bonuses are down.... that would actually in of itself be BAD news for RE... in that there is less of a bump to pull us out of the doldroms.

If prices dropped like a rock in Q4 like they did, and that was WITH the higher salaries... that is not a healthy sign for prices.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment