Skip Navigation

Banks are really shrinking now

Started by Riversider
about 14 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
http://www.cnbc.com/id/46851445 Investment banks are to shrink their balance sheets by another $1 trillion or up to 7 percent globally within the next two years, says a report that foresees a shake-up of market share in the industry. Higher funding costs and increased regulatory pressure to bolster capital will force wholesale banks also to cut 15 percent, or up to $0.9 trillion, of assets that are weighted by risk, a joint report by Morgan Stanley and consultants Oliver Wyman predicts. In addition, banks are expected take out $10 billion to $12 billion in costs by reducing pay, firing employees and paring back investments in areas that are no longer considered core.
Response by Bernie123
about 14 years ago
Posts: 281
Member since: Apr 2009

Yep. RS this is what I metntioned another thread... I work in traditonal risk managemnt but banks now need a huge regulatory & ops risk group that drives zero revenue. I am shocked how high the financials have gone... We're banging our heads every day looking for YOY growth but it ain't there. Sell financials while the price is plump.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 14 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

Financials are going up because the risk trade is on. The smart money, and those that understand a little of bank accounting and the current environment are not buying. Fake accounting and a broken business model is not a reason to invest.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jason10006
about 14 years ago
Posts: 5257
Member since: Jan 2009

I actually have to read the 90 page thing. But I read a similar one from JPM last week, and this is what all the analysts are saying.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jason10006
about 14 years ago
Posts: 5257
Member since: Jan 2009

Ergo, breaking up the banks is not necessary, they will shrink because of this.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 14 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

Top four commercial banks still control too many deposits. The Dallas Fed has it right.

http://dallasfed.org/assets/documents/fed/annual/2011/ar11.pdf

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by caonima
about 14 years ago
Posts: 815
Member since: Apr 2010

Madoff123, what kind of risk are you managing?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Bernie123
about 14 years ago
Posts: 281
Member since: Apr 2009

Ha! Regular old small business lending. Nothing sexy. ;) Still, it's a living.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ThomasTT
about 14 years ago
Posts: 14
Member since: Mar 2012

To be honest I wouldn't mind having banks broken up into smaller/specialized banks.
Too many banks allow front running orders by proprietary division from asset management.
Other kind of cross divisional schemed arise as well.
It would be harder to cheat clients out of their money if banks would not hold so many divisions.

Lastly smaller banks should be easier to regulate.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment