Skip Navigation

This site is awful

Started by tbateman
about 12 years ago
Posts: 2
Member since: Dec 2007
Discussion about
Vote with your wallets and eyeballs - NYtimes.com OLR
Response by Flutistic
about 12 years ago
Posts: 516
Member since: Apr 2007

Yeah. It's a loss. We ought to have a funeral.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by selyanow
about 12 years ago
Posts: 132
Member since: Dec 2007

They still don't get it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 12 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Looks as if they've fired the editors:

"The Hottest Trends Trends in Home Decor: Inside the Robert Allen Showroom" (uncorrected for almost a month)

"$7,000 PPSF? WHAT ARE PRICES IN SO HIGH FOR NYC LUX?"

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rlr689
about 12 years ago
Posts: 158
Member since: Apr 2012

NWT, I noticed that too. So unprofessional. What a mangled sentence!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by felixavis
about 12 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Jun 2008

Totally agree. How do you get access to the original version of StreetEasy? The original version was "easy" because it had all the information on one page. No scrolling around, trying to dig through the glossy graphics. I thought there was supposed to be a link to go back to the old version but I don't see it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rlr689
about 12 years ago
Posts: 158
Member since: Apr 2012

felix,
Is the old link not on the right side around 1/3 or half way down on the new website? I have been getting back to the old SE that way.

Once the old version is no longer accessible, I too will be outta here. :(

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by drdrd
about 12 years ago
Posts: 1905
Member since: Apr 2007

RIP, StreetEasy. It's been fun but our beloved SE has been Zillified; ie. F'ed.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kylewest
about 12 years ago
Posts: 4455
Member since: Aug 2007

I don't understand why they pay a fortune for something that works spectacularly only to change it in ways that add no value. Not a single comment I've read since the sale has been favorable. Not one. I know people tend to resist change, but when 100% of users voicing an opinion are of one mind, you would think that would mean something to the people running a company.

On the former site, at a glance I could assess a property. Now I feel I have to scroll and click all over. And the appearance is like K-Mart. It looks cheap. Like it was designed by old people for old people. Where are all the under 30 tech wizards at Zillow? At site for NYC RE should be sharp, current, fast -- like NYC. I just can't believe any exec would look at Zillow's new interface and say, "Yes, this is great." Especially when comparing it to what existed. It is, frankly, baffling.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hofo
about 12 years ago
Posts: 453
Member since: Sep 2008

Just use the old link, http://streeteasy.com/?lnf=old

New site is so weak.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West34
about 12 years ago
Posts: 1040
Member since: Mar 2009

Kylewest you must have missed this:

http://therealdeal.com/issues_articles/zillow-shocks-insiders-with-streeteasy-strategy/

Zillow doesnt give a shit about what we all think. This site is not for us anymore.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aus
about 12 years ago
Posts: 28
Member since: Jun 2008

Could even be worse than that - could be actively enjoying the spectacle of people flailing around helplessly, while they in control, will pull the pin whenever they choose!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Truth
about 12 years ago
Posts: 5641
Member since: Dec 2009

Michael Smith needs to get a new tailor: his suit-sleeves are too long.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kylewest
about 12 years ago
Posts: 4455
Member since: Aug 2007

Both of the guys are wearing suits that look a size too big in the shoulders. Jackets are also about 2" too long. Why do most men settle for badly fitting suits? I've never understood it.

I agree with Miller in the article linked to above: “I think they are leaving acquired technology on the table.”

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Truth
about 12 years ago
Posts: 5641
Member since: Dec 2009

kyle: I knew you would agree. I've never understood it either, especially men with money for good suits and a good tailor.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by snezanc
about 12 years ago
Posts: 121
Member since: Oct 2007

that real deal article is really sad. I don't know why they sold

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Truth
about 12 years ago
Posts: 5641
Member since: Dec 2009

Why? It wasn't to buy a nicer, better-fitting suit.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Bigdaddyj
about 12 years ago
Posts: 26
Member since: Jul 2009

This reminds me of when Gawker bought Cityfile; it was strictly an eliminate the competition thing, and after buying it they shuttered what was otherwise a very fun (and again local to NYC) site, almost to the point that it was just bought so it could be destroyed...very sad, and what I expect will soon happen here as well...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by drdrd
about 12 years ago
Posts: 1905
Member since: Apr 2007

I certainly don't understand it but I suspect you're right. At the very least, they want to go in a completely different direction but, again, I don't understand.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Ottawanyc
about 12 years ago
Posts: 842
Member since: Aug 2011

I downloaded the new Ap and it is actually quite good. Very easy to find useful information. A step closer actually to the old web site. Obvioulsy though, it would have been under development long before the sale.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment