Biggest Bull Market Sign Yet? Deal to Build at Railyards on West Side SIgned, Sealed, and Delivered
Started by malraux
over 17 years ago
Posts: 809
Member since: Dec 2007
Discussion about
New York Observer 21 May 2008 "Now it's really official: the M.T.A. board this afternoon voted to approve a deal with the Related Companies and Goldman Sachs to develop over the 26-acre West Side rail yards. A few nuggets of rail yards info from the meeting: According to M.T.A. CFO Gary Dellaverson, who summarized negotiations to the board, the key to the Related Companies' victory was its... [more]
New York Observer 21 May 2008
"Now it's really official: the M.T.A. board this afternoon voted to approve a deal with the Related Companies and Goldman Sachs to develop over the 26-acre West Side rail yards.
A few nuggets of rail yards info from the meeting: According to M.T.A. CFO Gary Dellaverson, who summarized negotiations to the board, the key to the Related Companies' victory was its willingness to literally pick up the $1.054 billion Tishman Speyer deal and sign it, only inserting one notable change.
The other two firms remaining, Extell Development and Durst Organization/Vornado Realty Trust, came back with formidable bids—Durst/Vornado had bid within $40 million of Tishman Speyer and Extell raised its bid to no more than $900 million—but were both unwilling to sign the designation letter that came as the result of weeks of negotiations with Tishman."
So, in the end, one company gets it, and two additional come back with "formidable bids."
So let's review -
1.) weasel boy says "Biggest Bear Market Sign Yet: Deal to Build at Railyards on West Side Collapses." OOPS - WRONG!
2.) weasel bay says "Developers who a year ago would have gleefully bid any price for a building or a project are now delaying or abandoning projects..." OOPS - WRONG!
3.) weasel boy says "Yes it will be developed - at a far lower price." OOPS - WRONG!
4.) weasel boy says "The two sides will take the next four months to complete a contract to buy the development rights." That's where the last deal fell apart. Let's see what it looks like in 4 months. This is merely an agreement to try to reach an agreement." OOPS - WRONG!
Evidently,
"That old gray mare still
IS what it used to be
IS what it used to be
IS what it used to be..."
[less]
Response by ccdevi
over 17 years ago
Posts: 861
Member since: Apr 2007
this made me laugh.
steve please try and keep your response to less then 250 words.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by SteveEasy
over 17 years ago
Posts: 18
Member since: May 2008
Just keep in mind these words of wisdom:
imputed rent = market rent
renting is always financially better than owning
60% returns in the stock market? piece of cake..
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by VVerain
over 17 years ago
Posts: 172
Member since: May 2008
SteveEasy, you know, you are sounding a lot less dramatic these days, shouldn't you be insulting us all or blaming us for the fact that your arguments don't hold water?
this made me laugh.
steve please try and keep your response to less then 250 words.
Just keep in mind these words of wisdom:
imputed rent = market rent
renting is always financially better than owning
60% returns in the stock market? piece of cake..
SteveEasy, you know, you are sounding a lot less dramatic these days, shouldn't you be insulting us all or blaming us for the fact that your arguments don't hold water?
oh, i almost forgot - nybits.com
LMAO!!! Checkmate.