JuiceMan, if you want to publish something POSITIVE in Manhattan real estate, try an article like this: "CHICAGO (MarketWatch) -- Something happened last year in Chicago that hasn't been seen since 2001: Instead of losing residents, the Second City actually gained population. According to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, the city's population rose 0.3% between July 2006 and July 2007. While the... [more]
JuiceMan, if you want to publish something POSITIVE in Manhattan real estate, try an article like this:
"CHICAGO (MarketWatch) -- Something happened last year in Chicago that hasn't been seen since 2001: Instead of losing residents, the Second City actually gained population. According to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, the city's population rose 0.3% between July 2006 and July 2007. While the growth may look paltry compared with other U.S. cities', it hints at how the sluggish housing market and the credit crunch is affecting migration trends, demographers say."
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/residents-stay-put-housing-slumps/story.aspx?guid={1D55686A-E0B3-4CAF-8E2D-4AA54E70F330}
That is a trend that will help NYC. Not the garbage you posted that Morgan Stanley reduced payrolls by $1 billion and then increased them by $400 million - as if that were good for Manhattan.
[less]
Why is this a stand alone post?
Could someone need attention?
"Could someone need attention?"
What?
steve buddy, I think you feell in a trap by otin.
If there's a trap I must have missed it. Still.
Awww, steve is lonely . . .
Oh, LICC! You're just being a silly-billy!