Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

700 park ave apt #2a

Started by nicesmile
over 6 years ago
Posts: 90
Member since: May 2016
Discussion about 700 Park Avenue #2A
why is this not getting traction?
Response by Anton
over 6 years ago
Posts: 507
Member since: May 2019

facing avenue, too noise. difficult to add a room. too difficult to do renovation in the building

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc_sport
over 6 years ago
Posts: 809
Member since: Jan 2009

40% financing, 2% flip tax, yet still pretty high maintenance. You can see how these costs depress pricing. That, and a bland 1960s building. While not responsive to the original question, the pricing history of 16B is rather humorous:

03/01/2019 Price decreased by 22% $3,500,000 ↓
09/28/2018 Price decreased by 5% $4,500,000 ↓
09/06/2017 Price decreased by 4% $4,750,000 ↓
05/08/2017 Price decreased by 7% $4,950,000 ↓
04/13/2016 Price decreased by 4% $5,300,000 ↓
06/18/2015 Listed by Sotheby's International Realty $5,500,000
05/28/2015 Brown Harris Stevens Listing is no longer available on StreetEasy Last priced at $5,500,000 $5,500,000
05/01/2012 Previously Listed by Brown Harris Stevens $6,300,000
09/15/2010 Brown Harris Stevens Listing is no longer available on StreetEasy $11,100,000
06/03/2009 Off market temporarily $11,100,000
11/25/2008 Previously Listed by Brown Harris Stevens $11,100,000
11/22/2008 Previously Listed by Halstead Property $11,100,000

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pier45
over 6 years ago
Posts: 379
Member since: May 2009

Wow that is quite a journey to find the right price. I'm glad the broker included such helpful material as that the apartment with $9K maintenance has a garage that gives special rates to shareholders.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
over 6 years ago
Posts: 10570
Member since: Feb 2007

2A maintenance is very good.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Anton
over 6 years ago
Posts: 507
Member since: May 2019

monthly is $2,725 , who said it is 9k?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
over 6 years ago
Posts: 10570
Member since: Feb 2007

They were referring to 16B.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stache
over 6 years ago
Posts: 1299
Member since: Jun 2017

So weird that you have to step down into the apt. -

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Anton
over 6 years ago
Posts: 507
Member since: May 2019

suspect there is an A-hole board and management

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by UESNeghbor
over 6 years ago
Posts: 0
Member since: Mar 2014

Big apartment, but a gut renovation required in a building with a history of board turndowns and expensive fees that make renovations challenging. New windows, new floors, new electric, new kitchen, new baths, etc. This is a project.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
over 6 years ago
Posts: 10570
Member since: Feb 2007

This is not a grand pre-war but a post war with low ceilings. What is the hell is the board thinking with 60 percent down requirements?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
over 6 years ago
Posts: 9878
Member since: Mar 2009

Some of these Upper East Side buildings seem to think they can make up for lack of architectural character by being difficult to deal with. It's like putting a velvet rope at the front door of Denny's.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stache
over 6 years ago
Posts: 1299
Member since: Jun 2017

Ha ha good one 30 -

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by George
over 6 years ago
Posts: 1327
Member since: Jul 2017

Ha! If only it was just a velvet rope. Imagine if, to eat at Denny's, you had to do the following:

- Make a reservation at least 90 days in advance, since the maitre d'hotel is gone all summer
- Submit 5 letters of reference from people that the maitre d' likes (or wants to get to know), stating that you do not burp or fart at the table
- Prove with financial records that you can afford dinner, as well as 5 more dinners
- Agree that you will not move food around on your plate except during the summer months
- Agree not to leave the table until you find another customer who is acceptable to the maitre d' and who is willing to pay more than you did for the meal
- Agree that the restaurant can engage in whatever form of illegal discrimination they want, regardless of Fair Restaurant Laws
- Come for a personal interview with your dog, who will be weighed to verify <20 lbs
- Pay a $2500 processing fee by certified cheque

Submit all this by courier with 10X copies. Then maybe you'll be able to eat dinner at our Denny's.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by itesfai
over 6 years ago
Posts: 77
Member since: Nov 2012

Wow, George, Can you put me on the list? :)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
over 6 years ago
Posts: 10570
Member since: Feb 2007

All joking aside, which I enjoyed, the layout and location is very good. It is hard to get so many rooms facing park avenue. Window replacement is likely coop’s responsibility.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 6 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

>300 - agree re: layout and location, but second floor is awful - everyone passing/driving by sees right in

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
over 6 years ago
Posts: 10570
Member since: Feb 2007

Better than a townhouse when it comes to a passer by looking in.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
over 6 years ago
Posts: 10570
Member since: Feb 2007

Or many new developments with floor to ceiling glass where everyone can see inside many floors up.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stache
over 6 years ago
Posts: 1299
Member since: Jun 2017

I had a basement apt in Chicago by a bus stop and everyone thought it was great fun to look down into my window to see what I was up to.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by davenezia
over 6 years ago
Posts: 132
Member since: Sep 2018

In my coop here in Manhattan (juncture of Greenwich Village and Chelsea), the window replacement was MY responsibility. So is keeping them clean (the building only washes them 2x per year). With a beautiful view, I want clean windows. Do other coops pay for window replacement?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by multicityresident
over 6 years ago
Posts: 2431
Member since: Jan 2009

Yes. Each coop’s particular Proprietary Lease should cover which party (Corporation Lessor or Shareholder Lessee) bears responsibility for windows.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by multicityresident
over 6 years ago
Posts: 2431
Member since: Jan 2009

In ours, corporation pays for window replacement per express terms of Proprietary Lease.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
over 6 years ago
Posts: 9878
Member since: Mar 2009

Most Coops Proprietary Leases say the Coop is responsible for windows, but a building wide replacement is so expensive that everyone has to be assessed to pay for the project (and the assessment is based on shared count not windows which often ends up being inequitable in that manner). However, if an individual shareholder feels like replacing their windows then the co-op will still tell them that if it's something that they want to do then they have to pay for it - the Coops tend only to pay when it's everyone getting them.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stache
over 6 years ago
Posts: 1299
Member since: Jun 2017

That's what happened in my building. At first they were only going to replace units that wanted new windows, then they decided it would be best to replace everybody's.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by multicityresident
over 6 years ago
Posts: 2431
Member since: Jan 2009

To 30yrs’ point, a shareholder cannot just decide they want different windows and force the corporation to pay for them; for the corporation to have to pay for new windows if windows are the corporation’s responsibility per terms of Proprietary Lease, the windows in place must be NEED to be replaced, at which point the corporation (via the board) has to make a quality assessment as to how much the corporation is willing to spend on replacement windows. If a shareholder wants higher quality than the corporation would put in left to its own devices, the expense will then be on shareholder even though windows NEED to be replaced and such is technically corporation’s responsibilty. Our board had recent discussion of how this approach has mucked up our facede - every apartment on the facade has different windows and all agree that it looks suboptimal.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by davenezia
over 6 years ago
Posts: 132
Member since: Sep 2018

Yes to everyone's comments! I should have clarified that the building has a specific window specification (they are Pella windows) and must be vinyl exteriors with wood interiors. I thought that was very strange, but the Board said it had something to do with landmark status requirements. Yet I can't figure in my wildest dream that a prewar building like mine would have had vinyl windows! They're sensation windows, however, and a breeze to clean. All must also be 60/40 (40 top with 60 bottom.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment