Skip Navigation

Location, location, location

Started by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
over 5 years ago
Posts: 9880
Member since: Mar 2009
Discussion about 484 Greenwich Street
Is this house worth more or less than 357 West 17th St? (another somewhat location challenged house) PS HTH did they come up with that square footage?
Response by stache
over 5 years ago
Posts: 1302
Member since: Jun 2017
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stache
over 5 years ago
Posts: 1302
Member since: Jun 2017

484 5M more and no pool. Probably a safer location but these days a townhouse would need heavy security anyway if unrest perks up again which I think it will.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
over 5 years ago
Posts: 10577
Member since: Feb 2007

484 got walled off at the back!! I am sure there is a prince of darkness with $20mm.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
over 5 years ago
Posts: 9880
Member since: Mar 2009
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
over 5 years ago
Posts: 10577
Member since: Feb 2007

Perhaps there is more than one prince of darkness.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 5 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

West 17TH street is just more beautiful and very sybaritic

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
over 5 years ago
Posts: 10577
Member since: Feb 2007

484 sold for 10.5mm in 2013 renovated.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc_sport
over 5 years ago
Posts: 809
Member since: Jan 2009

484 was a split commercial/residential when sold in 2013, with a very expensive renovation since then. Something about the decor screams California to me. Wonder if this is a Hollywood type.

https://www.livabl.com/2014/02/484-greenwich-street.html

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
over 5 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

That square footage seems impossible.
If you take the 2nd floor living room, the square portion of the footprint call it 27' by 30' = 810 sq ft.
The leftover triangle if the pythagorean theorem still holds is 27' by 13' and split that in half =175 sq ft.
Be generous, call it 1000 sq ft per floor. Get obscenely philanthropic, call it 8 floors basement and roof deck and your still only 8,000 sq ft.

It is wider and they do say girth matters

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
over 5 years ago
Posts: 9880
Member since: Mar 2009

In the article nyc_sport linked to it says the most recent renovation "will go from 5,840 square feet to 7,014 square feet."

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by multicityresident
over 5 years ago
Posts: 2432
Member since: Jan 2009

I had to look up “sybaratic.”

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 5 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

Yes, it’s a portmanteau between “aphroditic” and “syphilis”.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 5 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

Well , it is “sybaritic” - maybe you need a dictionary

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 5 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

Then again, I guess you see lots of places with parking in the house, a screening room, a pool, etc. etc. definitely how a sybarite would like to live.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 5 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

I just meant the word, ph41, not the place. The place is legit.

BTW, which of the 4 variants of sybarite did you mean: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybarite?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by multicityresident
over 5 years ago
Posts: 2432
Member since: Jan 2009

@ph41 - After I looked up sybaritic and found out what it means, I absolutely concurred with your use of it with respect to this house.

@inonada - I can imagine either the first or the fourth variant in that house.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 5 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

>ino - could only go with the 1st of those, or more to the point, the standard meaning (in most dictionaries) of a person devoted to luxury and pleasure.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 20 Comments
  2. 25 Comments