Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

shiller's the man ....

Started by ivote4steve
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5
Member since: Oct 2008
Discussion about
a picture is worth a 1000 words and many more $$ .... http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2005/08/21/business/21real.graphic.html
Response by malraux
about 17 years ago
Posts: 809
Member since: Dec 2007
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by TheFed
about 17 years ago
Posts: 176
Member since: Mar 2008

Yeah but we all know that case/shiller doesn't cover Manhattan so it's totally irrelevant.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by serge07
about 17 years ago
Posts: 334
Member since: Aug 2008

There are some interesting & telling price charts that are directly correlated to Manhattan commercial real estate property values. These REITs have heavy concentration in the NYC commercial RE markets and rental apt. buildings.

The stock market is far quicker to discount reality than the slow to adjust residential market.

Check out the 3 year price charts @ Yahoo Finance or Bigcharts for:

Vornado Realty Trust (VNO): High $137/share in 1Q 2007. Today, $87.

SL Green Properties (SLG): High $155/share in !Q 2007. Today, $62.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ivote4steve
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5
Member since: Oct 2008

so fed how much would you say manhattan apts have appreciated since the 1890s prior to the mid-1990s 10, 20, 1000%? the water just tastes better in manhattan than in the rest of the country.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

And don't forget... Shiller also called the dot bomb stock market bubble as well. "Irrational Exuberance" was the title of the book...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Admiral
about 17 years ago
Posts: 393
Member since: Aug 2008

Shiller's first edition of "Irrational Exuberance" called the stock bubble; the second edition of the same title added a chapter on the R/E bubble. I'm not sure if he's the greatest economist or whatnot but he certainly is 2-for-2 in spotting oncoming disasters. Should've had him on the Titanic...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ivote4steve
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5
Member since: Oct 2008

obama should take him as treasury secretary rather than that conflict of interest we have right now ....

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Admiral
about 17 years ago
Posts: 393
Member since: Aug 2008

Obama isn't likely to be elected, regardless of what the polls say.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mimi
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1134
Member since: Sep 2008

Admiral, you are showing the same old republican blindness that made us fall as much down as we are now....I don't get it, is it a superiority complex? a sense of eternal entitlement? What makes you feel that americans will vote a party that has mismanaged the economy and the war at this extent? This kinda bottom is not enough for u? Are you really looking forward to a war with Russia and the total collapse of all americans' savings?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Admiral
about 17 years ago
Posts: 393
Member since: Aug 2008

Mimi, sorry, I should've been more clear. you have jumped to the wrong conclusions. What i meant was, the Bradley effect will take a huge toll on Obama.

Anyway, I've taken the thread horribly off topic. Apologies.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by type3secretion
about 17 years ago
Posts: 281
Member since: Jun 2008

"Obama isn't likely to be elected, regardless of what the polls say."

This has been my conclusion as well. I grew up in Alabama. It's uglier than most who don't know believe. I would love to be proved wrong by a populace that has left the dark ages, but I'm not holding my breath.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
about 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

"I'm not sure if he's the greatest economist or whatnot but he certainly is 2-for-2 in spotting oncoming disasters"

I think there is some luck involved in the timing, but there is definitely skill involved. We're not talking about a guy who guess, we're talking about the guy who pretty much was the only one to look at the RE markets will a rational approach. He came to his conclusions because he was the one to chart the real long term returns, and even built a better system of comparison (the S&P/CS index is based on his theories).

My take is, anybody who saw those numbers could have predicted what would have happened, he just happened to be the guy with the foresight to develop the system to see those numbers.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment