Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Truffles Tribeca

Started by anonymous
about 17 years ago
Anyone know anything about this mysterious rental development?
Response by savmav
about 17 years ago
Posts: 7
Member since: Dec 2008

This seems a bit out of way, no?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by samename
about 17 years ago
Posts: 15
Member since: Dec 2008

One of the oddest marketing plans out there.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

I was just chatting with the guys behind this -- they're going more public in January. Three beds will be "competitive" with the Verdesian -- which I would guess puts them in the $8000-$8500 range. Are you looking for that, or something smaller?

ali r.
{downtown broker}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aceSavoy
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Dec 2008

Front Porch ... what about 101 Warren? These are SO expensive!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by k2k2k2
about 17 years ago
Posts: 21
Member since: Nov 2008

what's the appropriate $ / sq ft for a rental in a new development in this part of nyc? is 40 / sqft too much?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nointerest
about 17 years ago
Posts: 69
Member since: Dec 2008

It is a little high, but the location is very prime.
Just the timing is not quite right. A year ago would have been perfect.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

Pricing seems to be coming down on the 101 Warren rentals -- it looks like there's an inventory buildup in that corner of the world. I show 34 units, with a price range of $6,500 to $14,500 for two-beds.

As far as price, $40 psf will get you into some buildings but not others. It will get you into the Verdesian but not 200 Chambers, so that starts to be a consumer decision about where you most want to live and what your money's worth to you.

I think the question of what's "appropriate" to pay depends almost more on your circumstances than on inventory. Is it "appropriate" to pay $1,000 for a suit? Well, that depends on your job, really. Similarly, I think it's okay to pay whatever you want for a rental as long as you're not spending more than 25% of your income.

ali r.
{downtown broker}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by loftparade
about 17 years ago
Posts: 16
Member since: Mar 2008

I'd pay top dollar to live in a luxury rental downtown if only the building would prohibit post-frat shares stuffed with 6 analysts, e.g., 88 Leonard.... I can see it now, beer stains on the billiard tables, cigarette burns on the opium couch, used condoms stuck between the chesterfield's cushions, jenna jameson's apartment in the valley trilogy playing in the screening room....

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nointerest
about 17 years ago
Posts: 69
Member since: Dec 2008

It's not like it's the Playboy Suite at the Palms casino in Vegas. Doubt those kind of antics will be going on anywhere except an NYU condo dorm.

I see 200 Chambers as being a good long term investment. Very established Asian base so far, and convenient to public transportation, and shopping. Very close to all the destination daily stores, Whole Foods, B-B & B, etc. But Truffles is a little far from shopping and transportation. Would have done better as a condo (not in these immediate times, but long term). Can see rental people not so excited on the privacy aspect.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by loftparade
about 17 years ago
Posts: 16
Member since: Mar 2008

Nointerest, agree completely that truffles would have done better as a condo...especially if they had priced a little bit less than superior ink. Location is great, especially if you work in the FiDi...just jump in a cab down the west side hway. And it would have been even better if they had offered parking. Was very excited about it (just loved the playful dig about Brokers with the Albee quote) until I realized it was going to be a rental building. 200 Chambers is better w/r/t proximity to transportation, but you must admit that looks like an ugly office building. Pure rental buildings ARE a lot like NYU dorms. I think the high price point will help deter a certain number of those types of residents, but the downside is that artsy, introspective types (e.g., the sort who watch polanski trilogies and contemplate existence on the opium couch) without family money will be priced out as well. I concede that my example was indeed satirical and quite a bit hyperbolic, but I don't know how the building, as a pure rental building , is going to live up to its admittedly awesome image.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rufus
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1095
Member since: Jul 2008

loftparade, your point is quite accurte. Pure rental buildings, even the "luxury" ones, are really mediocre because many of them are part of the 80/20 programs, thus giving out apartments to poor people at a major discount while many others are simply priced out. I have a lot of friends who live in these buildings, and the people in the 80/20 program cause a lot of trouble and are disrespectful of their neighbors.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by MrSulu
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Dec 2008

Why live in the Verdesian if it doesn't overlook the Hudson? Wouldn't the Solaire sister building be better? I think many of the batter park buildings if they only have a "internal" view are going to be dreary.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rufus
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1095
Member since: Jul 2008

Riverhouse is the only building in battery park city that's noteworthy. Everything else is mediocre; they all look the same. It's sad how low the quality of architecture in NYC is.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by anonymous
about 17 years ago

89 Murray is also in the 101 Warren building, must be nice there.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

The units in the Verdesian that do overlook the Hudson are very pretty, and the building's service is so good that even those units that look at the back over those little vest-pocket parks . . .well, they're a nice restful change if you've been shlepping around Midtown all day. Obviously there's construction going on down there, so it's not totally idyllic, but some clients who see it after Chelsea are just like, "wow, this is serene."

ali r.
{downtown broker}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rainer
about 17 years ago
Posts: 21
Member since: Nov 2008

Solaire vs Verdesian?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by anonymous
about 17 years ago

Those two buildings don't discount, but the other ones in north Battery Park ... abundant extra supply even for this time of year. Definite discounts available.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rufus
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1095
Member since: Jul 2008

gleeclub, 89 murray is not nice. It's given out half of its apartments to poor people, as part of the city's overly generous liberal program of handing out luxury apartments to those who don't deserve it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rufus
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1095
Member since: Jul 2008

Verdesian stinks. Lousy location.

The city is now a construction warzone. Very few places worth living in.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nointerest
about 17 years ago
Posts: 69
Member since: Dec 2008

Where do you live rufus? If you are so anti-New York, then why are you constantly blogging on a website about New York?

Do you live in Chicago? I have been a couple of times, but don't like it. Very Midwest and the accents are really bad there.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rufus
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1095
Member since: Jul 2008

I live in upper west side.

I don't think Chicago's accents are any worse than new york accents.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

Solaire and Verdesian are run by the same people, so I've generally found it's more a question of what units are available than anything else. If I had to make a distinction, I'd say some people like the finishes in the Solaire better, but they like the fact that the Verdesian is newer.

ali r.
{downtown broker}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rufus
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1095
Member since: Jul 2008

front_porch, what do you think of the millennium and ritz carlton condos in battery park city? How do you compare them to other downtown condos?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

They're both competing against the Visionaire -- the Southern end of BPC has poor subway access, so it tends to sell itself as "views and quiet" -- versus the Northern end of BPC, which is really hitting hard on the "Tribeca-adjacent" note.

That said, I haven't been in either one, and so it's hard to address their pros and cons. I was just down at Riverhouse looking at a multi-bedroom unit -- and that brought home to me that even more than many apartments, you can't really value "view units" on paper.

ali r.
{downtown broker}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hacha
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Oct 2008

open yet?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Swine
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Jan 2009

I got an email about this 3 weeks ago and also see they are doing keyword buying on Google. But, I drove buy, what a disaster. They said they were opening in January, the location looks like the developer or construction company went bankrupt. Wow. Maybe it'll be done for the summer?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by CraigY22
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 16
Member since: Jan 2009

Yes, you've seen this marketing campaign. This is called the developer's "crazy" marketing strategy, and when the site and the building are all losers, try to attract tenants by being crazy. It may work.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hacha
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Oct 2008

Hmm, guess not

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by loftparade
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 16
Member since: Mar 2008

Anyone know what's going on with this building? I've left multiple messages on their machine (always get that stupid "all our agents are currently in the field" recording) and no one gets back to me. Truly baffles me why they'd blow a wad of money putting together their "crazy" marketing strategy and then not call people back. Unless Swine is on to something and the developer or construction company has in fact gone bankrupt.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by anonymous
almost 17 years ago

I think they are not starting to rent for real. Timing is crappy ... February?? Not to mention the rental market can't be that robust.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malthus
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1333
Member since: Feb 2009

A bunch went on the market a couple of days ago. No floorplans and only outside pictures. I would be interested to hear firsthand accounts.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nycsouth
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 29
Member since: Jun 2007

i called and left a message about renting an apt here back in Nov. someone just called me back last week-i laughed, a lot

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by loftparade
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 16
Member since: Mar 2008

I went there and can now confirm that this place is horrendous. By the way, the blonde guy at the leasing office is a complete dbag.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sammimendenhall
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 2
Member since: Sep 2008

Loftparade~

Can you describe the interior of the Truffles building? I am beyond disgruntled living in the Crest Lofts at 67 Wall Street. I just moved here from LA--had a 1200 sq ft loft and my neighbors were adults. I have traded that space for an expensive dormitory where most of my neighbors are still in college!! I don't want to hear them or see them but because there's a game room with a ping pong and foos ball table down the hall, it's frat night every night! So, I am looking for a new place ASAP!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bmw
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 219
Member since: Jan 2009

They made the rentals so easy to do that they renting out like hot cakes, owner paying fee and the units priced reasonably, for rent that is.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by loftparade
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 16
Member since: Mar 2008

sammimendenhall, well, it's safe to say that not even the 2brs are going to clock in at anything near the size of your LA pad. As for the interior and the, how shall I say, ambiance, in all fairness, the place has yet to be inhabited (think they expect the first building to open in April) but if the other high end Tribeca rentals are any indication, it should pretty much comport with your description of 67 Wall, though I suspect that most of the tenants will not actually be in college and are more prone to be post-college types that still act like they're in college. Keep in mind because there are around 300 units (and I suspect there will be a lot of college style sharing and futon surfers), the amenity spaces (the big selling point as far as the developer is concerned) won't turn out to be that huge after all...and of course there's a going to be pool table and a Wii...just like at any respectable frat house. And that's their target demographic given ads like this....

http://curbed.com/archives/2009/02/27/curbedwire_truffles_tribeca_unleashes_the_hot_chicks_voice_name_game_continues.php

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malthus
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1333
Member since: Feb 2009

I'm curioius whether anyone walked through yesterday. I stopped by but they wanted a waiver and a wait for the walk through so I kept going. It seemed like they had a lot of interest but it also seemed like they have a long way to go. Any firsthand opinions?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by downtownsnob
over 16 years ago
Posts: 171
Member since: Nov 2008

I took a friend by this place who's looking to rent in Tribeca. Have to say the river views are impressive. But the 2 bedrooms are very TIGHT. Can't have a lot of furniture if you're moving here. To be honest the game room/lounge/Prive thing looked pretty cool. I think they're charging $800 annual dues so maybe that'll keep the frat boys at the Irish pub instead...However the employees in the sales office are beyond terrible; they have 2007 arrogance.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 10007
over 16 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Mar 2009

i would not trust this developer!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nycrenting
over 16 years ago
Posts: 7
Member since: Dec 2008

the sales staff at this place don't realize that arrogance is not a good selling style.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malthus
over 16 years ago
Posts: 1333
Member since: Feb 2009

curbed is reporting they are 50% rented.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by maleprop
over 16 years ago
Posts: 30
Member since: May 2009

walked by today
wasn't a fan of the grey grey grey
or the tenement style of looking at your neighbors
especially with the floor to ceiling windows

saw some of the agents in suits ... on a weekend, you shouldn't be wearing a suit

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jhursh
over 16 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Jul 2009

this building has a marketing plan for douches

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
over 16 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

Are there really THAT many households making at least $350,000/year?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by leftys
over 16 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Jul 2009

you don't need $350,000 to live there.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by weichertpark
over 16 years ago
Posts: 2
Member since: Jul 2009

This too is such a fringe area. If you are going to live so far to the highway, you need to be rich to have a limo pick you up all the time. Otherwise, the walk isn't worth it. And the walk to a grocery store, etc.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malthus
over 16 years ago
Posts: 1333
Member since: Feb 2009

4 blocks to the subway and no more than 7 to the nearest supermarket. Close to the park and most of tribeca. The neighborhood has appeal. The building, not so much.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Downtownster
over 16 years ago
Posts: 140
Member since: Mar 2009

Check out our thoughts on Truffles here:

http://www.downtownyblog.com/2009/06/truffles-tribeca.html

It's a cool building and very unique for that area - not a lot of smaller new construction apartments in Tribeca. You pay through the nose for it though :)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by RR1
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 137
Member since: Nov 2008

Why the HELL are rents so high in this building?

3,000 for a studio?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by dspelman
over 15 years ago
Posts: 4
Member since: Jul 2009

Rents were just raised even higher.
Building and apartments arenice but still feels like a construction zone.
Although it's only an 8 minute walk down Greenwich St to the heart of Tribeca, the location still feels remote (far from subway, grocery store, gym, can be difficult to get a taxi, surrounding streets are desolate, near Canal St / entrance to Holland tunnel - note the Truffles website lists the Franklin St. 1 as the closest subway, but in fact it's the Canal St 1 - they just don't want you to walk on Canal).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lad
over 15 years ago
Posts: 707
Member since: Apr 2009

I have to say I just don't "get" this building. The entire vibe, from the walled-in barren courtyard to the all-gray, all-industrial everything is somewhere between a converted self-storage unit and a prison. I tend to like industrial generally, but neither the design nor the workmanship seems well executed to me. I can't imagine having (cheap) construction floodlights as my light fixtures or walking through a hallway with self-storage-unit-style windows across from the apartment doors and not a straight paint line in sight. The entire design aesthetic, if you can call it that, is just bizarre. If people think this is cool, the joke's on them. The people we know there are moving. Thank goodness.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jasieg16
over 15 years ago
Posts: 123
Member since: Oct 2009

The building is terrible but the river view ph units are quite nice. Considered one a month ago while i am waiting for my very close by condo to finish up and begin closings. After i looked at the unit i decided that my only involvement in the building will be with the garage. Great garage.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by JDANE
over 15 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Apr 2010

Agree with lad

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by snowbear
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Apr 2009

yeah, this place is almost like a college dorm, where "kids" walk around in sweat pants and pretend to be so important. and the location is so far out of the way from any amenities that it becomes almost like a prison. i will say, however, that the staff is generally great. and the roof deck and gym can't be beat. but i'd never pay the prices they are asking for now.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lml4400
over 14 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Jan 2011

Anyone who signs on to live here deserves what they get. This place is so pretentious (see marketing campaign) and so lacking in meaningful in-apt amenities (see the floor plans). Went to see a 2 bdr on the second floor and the previous tenant had been evicted for smoking. Good luck getting rid of the smell.

The apt was so close to the West Side Highway I could roll down the windows of a taxi from the LR. Seriously if you want to be in TriBeCa but cant afford most prices, you really have to be willing to give up alot to settle in here and yes, it's a big giant dorm - oh and NO PETS.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment