S&P said it lowered ratings on 102 classes from 33 U.S. prime jumbo residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued from 1998!!! to 2004.
Started by HT1
over 16 years ago
Posts: 396
Member since: Mar 2009
Discussion about
S&P said it lowered ratings on 102 classes from 33 U.S. prime jumbo residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued from 1998 to 2004. The rating agency also affirmed ratings on 669 classes from 32 of the downgraded deals, as well as 34 other deals.
"The downgrades reflect our opinion that projected credit support for the affected classes is insufficient to maintain the previous ratings, given our current projected losses," S&P said in a statement.
Prime mortgages were originally thought to be less vulnerable to housing cycles. Home loans offered before 2005 -- when the lending binge really took off -- were also considered more solid. But the rapid increase in unemployment has undermined these assumptions.
Response by The_President
over 16 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009
if S&P is just as correct now as they were when they gave triple A ratings to subprime mortgages, then we are in good shape.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by HT1
over 16 years ago
Posts: 396
Member since: Mar 2009
this time it's different LOL
bad news for RE in Manhattan
now I understand why my neighbors were able to have these great vacations, a house in the Hamptons and all kind of toys - they are all in debt up to their noses...
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by The_President
over 16 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009
consdiering their track record, I don't see how this is bad news for Mahhattan. And in case you missed it, there is the potential for some really GREAT news for Manhattan real estate. See my Barney Frank thread for further info.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by HT1
over 16 years ago
Posts: 396
Member since: Mar 2009
If mortgages taken on in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are under water as S&P believes, we better watch out. This stuff is most likely still on the balance sheets of these banks - good luck.
Add to that the credit card crisis, commercial RE disaster - are you sure you want to be long the financials?
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by nyc10022
over 16 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008
The funny thing is, they probably are better in quality now then they were a few months ago.
if S&P is just as correct now as they were when they gave triple A ratings to subprime mortgages, then we are in good shape.
this time it's different LOL
bad news for RE in Manhattan
now I understand why my neighbors were able to have these great vacations, a house in the Hamptons and all kind of toys - they are all in debt up to their noses...
consdiering their track record, I don't see how this is bad news for Mahhattan. And in case you missed it, there is the potential for some really GREAT news for Manhattan real estate. See my Barney Frank thread for further info.
If mortgages taken on in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are under water as S&P believes, we better watch out. This stuff is most likely still on the balance sheets of these banks - good luck.
Add to that the credit card crisis, commercial RE disaster - are you sure you want to be long the financials?
The funny thing is, they probably are better in quality now then they were a few months ago.
These guys are so far behind, they're backward.