fha in the wrong century...
Started by Riversider
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
I can't believe they didnt' have a risk officer! By Romaine Bostick Sept. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Housing Administration, responsible for insuring more than 20 percent of the U.S. single-family mortgages made this year, said it’s tightening credit standards and will appoint a chief risk officer. “To be clear, the fund’s reserves are sufficient to cover our future losses, so the FHA will not require taxpayer assistance or new Congressional action,” Commissioner David H. Stevens said in a statement today. “That said, given the size and scope of the FHA and its importance to today’s market, these risk management and credit policy changes are important steps in strengthening the FHA fund, by ensuring that lenders have proper and sufficient protections.”
citi had an army of risk officers--seems fha is somehow still solvent, despite insurance of loans for some of the less wealthy--shocking, redbaiter, for a socialist gov't entity...citi...solvency?
Best thing Obama did was decide gov't needed a CIO.
Citi is insolvent in part because the Fed is more of a trade group thana regulator. They got to big to fail. If we kept Glass Stegal, Citi would still be ok.