Skip Navigation

Brokerage Fees

Started by Spiderman27
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 65
Member since: Dec 2007
Discussion about
On a standard 6% brokerage fee for an exclusive, what is the split between cobrokers? down the middle or slightly more to the exclusive agent or more to the guy who found the buyer? does one somethimes pay more or less to the exclusive broker of no cobroke as an incentive to either drive teh sale or to work with others? are things more or less proportionate on a 5% total fee? thanks to all
Response by urbandigs
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 3629
Member since: Jan 2006

50/50, you can always try to negotiate a tier structure if the buyer has no representation and there is only one broker getting paid at closing.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 5320
Member since: Mar 2008

REBNY rules state that you have to go 50/50 unless there's a side agreement between the firms. So if I take a listing at 6%, I can advertise the co-broke as 2.5%, but if a REBNY member brings in the buyer, I'm going to end up paying the co-broke out at 3%.

I can certainly offer to pay out more than 50%, so I could take a listing at 6% and offer the co-broke at 4%, but that's usually a red flag to the buyer's broker that something is wrong with listing and/or price.

ali r.
DG Neary Realty

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nycbrokerdax
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 180
Member since: Dec 2008

Ali, i am not sure that is correct, Rebny rules state that the commission will be split 50/50 unless the LISTING agreement specifies otherwise. Many people take listing agreements where the brokers are not compensated equally, the biggest example being new development, usually the developers rep is paid less than buyer's rep. Also I have seen many brokers take listings where they as exclusive agents are getting 2 or 2.5 percent, and the buyer's agent gets 3 percent.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 9880
Member since: Mar 2009

I think what Ali is referring to is that you can't take a listing at 6% and "put it out" offering the selling broker 1.5% to discourage selling brokers (i.e. as a way around the forced co-broking rule)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nycbrokerdax
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 180
Member since: Dec 2008

ahh, that makes more sense, i think i was interpreting it backwards

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ab_11218
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2017
Member since: May 2009

30yrs - your statement makes a lot of sense. i saw listings from Park Terrace Realty, Park Slope, a few years back that did just that. They were listing 1 to 1.5% commission split of 6%. This is why it took them, even in the hot market, 6+ months to sell properties.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment