Skip Navigation

Mortgage Recording Tax

Started by hkinterested
about 16 years ago
Posts: 60
Member since: Nov 2007
Discussion about
Any exemptions? What about if the purchaser uses the same bank to finance as seller? Can this almost be considered an assumption of seller's mortgage and therefore no mortgage recording tax? Any other exemptions?
Response by tricks73
about 16 years ago
Posts: 27
Member since: Jun 2008

1. Pay cash!
2. Assume seller's mortgage

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Kiz
about 16 years ago
Posts: 27
Member since: Feb 2010

Yes, it's doable -- we bought our condo with a CEMA and owed $0 mortgage tax. *However* -- it's a giant pain for the seller's lawyer, your mortgage bank's lawyer, and the title company, so all parties have to be willing to play ball. My attorney mentioned that with a sponsor sale, like ours, the sponsor basically has to structure their original mortgage in a way that makes it feasible -- it would have been very hard to after-the-fact.

You probably have the best chance of getting it in a sponsor sale where it's an incentive the developer offers, or from a very flexible private seller. We got it because our building's preferred mortgage lender actually suggested to me that I ask for it. We did, made it part of our original offer, and made the contract contingent on it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by shong
about 16 years ago
Posts: 616
Member since: Apr 2008

As Kiz mentioned, you can do a CEMA, some new developments allow it by doing a splitter on their current construction loan. Or you can do it on a re-sale if the seller has a mortgage with a bank that allows the assignment. But the amount you'll save on mortgage tax will depend on the amount of the mortgage the seller has. Yes, a lot more work for the attorneys, title company, and bank but if its allowed, why not? sunny.hong@bankofamerica.com

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment