Skip Navigation

Union ruins another Saigon Grill — again!

Started by commoner
about 15 years ago
Posts: 197
Member since: Apr 2010
Discussion about
http://www.dnainfo.com/20101206/upper-west-side/saigon-grill-workers-call-for-boycott-over-alleged-age-discrimination Where are they going to work if the restaurant shuts down? Evil small politicians manipulate the workers for the political gain. It used to be a pretty good neighborhood eatery. Doormen and delivery men get pay raises; the economy must be pretty good in certain quarters.
Response by maly
about 15 years ago
Posts: 1377
Member since: Jan 2009

Don't you just hate it when the little people revolt?
Let them eat cake, I say.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sidelinesitter
about 15 years ago
Posts: 1596
Member since: Mar 2009

We used to go to the one of E 88th all the time. Good, fast and cheap. It closed for renovations around the time the earlier scandal was getting rolling and never reopened. The corner retail space has now been empty 4 1/2 years. No winners there.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
about 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

the one in the village had some horrible press not so long ago. i loved the food, but i couldn't deal with the accusations. we quit eating there.

where are they going to work? maybe someplace that treats them with some respect?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by commoner
about 15 years ago
Posts: 197
Member since: Apr 2010

maly, it's not the little people's revolt. When these "little people" lose their livelihood (because they have no transferable skills, no language and, thanks to the agitators, no future) where all these political mammals will be? Moving to the next vulnerable underdogs to cost them their jobs?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by maly
about 15 years ago
Posts: 1377
Member since: Jan 2009

Exactly, they should be happy to work 70 hours a week for $1.27 an hour. If they are complaining, they're clearly not working hard enough.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by commoner
about 15 years ago
Posts: 197
Member since: Apr 2010

No, they should be complaining. But they should not be tricked into burning the only thing that feeds them. I don't have a solution. Tell me if you have one.
The thing is that they will not get ANY job if they lose this one. And, as sideliner said, another empty space will be there. Also, anything to say for doormen?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by The_President
about 15 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009

SO they should continue being abused because there are no other jobs? Well, sometimes people have principle. If the store goes empty, too bad. The owners brought it on themselves.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by maly
about 15 years ago
Posts: 1377
Member since: Jan 2009

The next underpaid delivery guy gets it!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by generalogoun
about 15 years ago
Posts: 329
Member since: Jan 2009

Commoner, here is a link to an EEOC fact sheet about the ADEA, for your edification. http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/age.html

If you don't like the law, tell your members of Congress. Maybe they'll agree with you that it's okay not to hire older workers. In the meantime, no restaurant owner may violate the law -- even if you don't agree.

The former owners of Saigon Grill knew what they were doing when they violated the NLRA, they did with impunity and they paid the price.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 25 Comments
  2. 42 Comments