Skip Navigation

Corporate Tax Rates Are too High

Started by Socialist
about 15 years ago
Posts: 2261
Member since: Feb 2010
Discussion about
I believe that the corporate tax rate in the U.S. is too high and should be lowered. Google, for instance, has an effective tax rate of 2.4%!!!! Can you beleive that? 2.4%! And wait, it gets better: Broadcom pays 1.4%! Pfizer pays 17%. http://thinkprogress.org/2011/03/24/winamerica-low-taxes/#
Response by truthskr10
about 15 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

It's not the corporate tax rate, it's the incentives given to special and/or particular corporations.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hol4
about 15 years ago
Posts: 710
Member since: Nov 2008

it's always people who get mad at "corporations" for outsourcing to indochina who are the first ones in line to get their ipads that cost $600 bones instead of $6,000 had it been truly made here..or love that Gap/Zara is having BOGO on their sweaters this wkend.. more ham, please

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Socialist
about 15 years ago
Posts: 2261
Member since: Feb 2010

electronics would not cost that much more if they were made here. Do you think that companies pass on the bulk of the savings they get from outsourcing jobs, or do they pocket it?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jordyn
about 15 years ago
Posts: 820
Member since: Dec 2007

Those listed tax rates are pretty silly, since (at least as far as the ones I investigated), it's the tax rate they're paying on overseas income rather than on US income. So it's almost completely irrelevant to the tax rates in the US.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
about 15 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

Once again, socialist doesn't know much about the subject he is speaking of.

Those profits get taxed *again* after that. So corporate tax rate on its own is meaningless. Its the total taxes paid on it that matters.

Democrats like to play that game, ignoring the fact that the old rich guy might actually be payign 50% in total on that income.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jordyn
about 15 years ago
Posts: 820
Member since: Dec 2007

"Those profits get taxed *again* after that. So corporate tax rate on its own is meaningless. Its the total taxes paid on it that matters."

That is silly. All profits get taxed again when they're transfered to other people.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by needsadvice
about 15 years ago
Posts: 607
Member since: Jul 2010

GE PAID NO TAXES ON 14.2 BILLION IN PROFIT IN 2010

PLUS THEY GOT 3.2 MILLION IN TAX BREAKS ON TOP OF THAT.

"For those unaccustomed to the loopholes and shelters of the corporate tax code, GE's success at avoiding taxes is nothing short of extraordinary. The company, led by Immelt, earned $14.2 billion in profits in 2010, but it paid not a penny in taxes because the bulk of those profits, some $9 billion, were offshore. In fact, GE got a $3.2 billion tax benefit."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/general-electric-paid-federal-taxes-2010/story?id=13224558

Whoever thinks corporations pay enough taxes is a fool.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 15 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

Why criticize GE for playing the game well to save money?

But, wouldn't it be better if we had a more rational rate and then fewer loopholes?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Socialist
about 15 years ago
Posts: 2261
Member since: Feb 2010

once again, somewherelese pops in and defends corproations being the corporate prostitute he is. I'm surprised he has not defended the owners of the Triangle Shirtwaist factory YET.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Socialist
about 15 years ago
Posts: 2261
Member since: Feb 2010

and in a completely and totally unrelated story, the Canadian govternment was just toppled today over the conservative adminsitrations's overly generous and unfunded corporate tax cuts.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Socialist
about 15 years ago
Posts: 2261
Member since: Feb 2010

"Opposition lawmakers toppled Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government, triggering an election that may result in an alliance to reverse his corporate tax cuts and overturn plans for more military spending."

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-25/opposition-set-to-trigger-canadian-election-may-aim-at-tax-cut.html

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 15 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

Blame Canada

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment