PIMCO criticizes Fed QEII policy
Started by LICComment
over 14 years ago
Posts: 3610
Member since: Dec 2007
Discussion about
The Fed's attempt to cover disastrous liberal fiscal policies will cause more problems. From PIMCO: "Just as Charles Ponzi needed donuts to turn back a suspicious crowd of investors, the Fed needs “donuts” in order to fill the bellies of the literally millions of investors worldwide who worry about the alarmingly large U.S. budget deficit and the impact that the U.S. debt dilemma could have on... [more]
The Fed's attempt to cover disastrous liberal fiscal policies will cause more problems. From PIMCO: "Just as Charles Ponzi needed donuts to turn back a suspicious crowd of investors, the Fed needs “donuts” in order to fill the bellies of the literally millions of investors worldwide who worry about the alarmingly large U.S. budget deficit and the impact that the U.S. debt dilemma could have on their Treasury holdings. Investors are no doubt worried they may have bought into an unsustainable scheme: the creation of a scourge of debt so large that the Fed itself has had to purchase the debt to keep the game going. All that the Fed has had to do thus far to keep the game going is press the “on” button to its virtual printing press, crediting the account of the U.S. Treasury. In the process, the Fed has kept the demand for U.S. Treasuries high, perhaps deceptively so, attracting with its redolence many classes of buyers, including households, banks, pension funds, insurance companies and foreign investors. Their collective buying has created what we believe to be a profit illusion with many investors mistakenly believing they can continuously reap profits from perpetually falling bond yields and rising bond prices, just as they have had opportunity to do over the past 30 years, amid the great secular bull market for Treasuries and the bond market more generally. For many reasons, this “duration tailwind” for Treasuries can’t last, particularly because the United States has reached the Keynesian Endpoint, where the last balance sheet has been tapped. In addition, with inflation expectations rising in the context of low levels of initial jobless claims, and with Federal Reserve officials themselves expressing reluctance to go beyond Quantitative Easing (QE) II, the Fed’s Treasury buying is expected to end in June, leaving others to carry the Treasury’s heavy load." [less]
Add Your Comment
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
Most popular
-
47 Comments
-
23 Comments
-
35 Comments
-
22 Comments
-
58 Comments
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
I hate to say that I agree with LICC, so I'll say that I agree with Pimco.
QEII is going to end disastrously - just look at the spot price of corn to find out why.
I agree with Pimco that QE2 won't end well--
Pimco and I don't agree with licDope that QE2 was arranged "to cover disastrous liberal fiscal policies"--this comment is standard licDope parroting of yet another kochtalk soundbite.
licDope drones hard to support this crap, despite that it is not at all in his interest
I don't agree with that part, either, the "Keynsian Endpoint" business. What is not working is monetarism, which is what QEII is. It's also what helped cause the housing bubble, the dot.com bubble, the collapse of the financial system, etc.
QEI was necessary - QEII is an attempt by Bernake to prove his PhD thesis was right. But it was not. See my other post regarding everything the markets have been ignoring - including a TSUNAMI! (for real!) - because of massive amounts of money with no place to go.
Except into the spot price of corn.
Bernake has to learn that you can take a horse to water... low interest rates are enough, they must find their own proper outlet. 3% annual growth forever is simply not possible: compounded it means that the world economy doubles in 25 years.
Yo licc, can you produce a long form birth certificate? Won't blog on a us Internet forum, if you can't prove you were born in the USA. Btw, licc is not part of nyc, much less USA. I hear it's part of a 'superfund'.
Super!
Dum funded!