Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Tenants from Hell

Started by tommy2tone
about 14 years ago
Posts: 218
Member since: Sep 2011
Discussion about
Over the weekend, I saw a movie with Melanie Griffith and Mathew Modine where they were the landlords to the tenant from hell. A real SOB. So far I think I've been lucky with my tenants. I had one female tenant that drove me crazy but she paid on time; that lady moved out when another cat (but nice to me!) moved in). But I've heard horror stories of people moving in and using the system to their advantage. Has anything changed over the years? Are the courts still very tenant friendly? Are there big differences between NY, NYC, NJ, CT law? How do you weed out the bullshit artists? I always get credit reports and do background checks. What else? Are there different rules regarding evictions for a 1, 2, 3, 4 or higher family house?
Response by notadmin
about 14 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

> But I've heard horror stories of people moving in and using the system to their advantage.

one big landlord in nyc once said that with the rules that the city imposes, paying rent is optional. :-)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ab_11218
about 14 years ago
Posts: 2017
Member since: May 2009

as a landlord you are at a disadvantage in the courts. put in a family with kids and your disadvantage gets even worse.

my wonderful landlord did the credit checks, etc on the tenants that live upstairs from me. they, almost certainly, used someone else's name as their legal status in US is questionable. they always pay ontime, good for my landlord. they flooded me 7 times over the course of less then 2 years. the landlord had to do the repairs. they came home at 11 pm and blasted music until 1 am daily. i threatened to call the cops and they stopped. they had the other laborers who work with them stay with them. they refused to assist during snow removal when it is part of the lease agreement. they dump garbage in front of the house that they can't get rid of at the store they work in. they find the ability to "park" their van in front of the house and block a few driveways while leaving the van 2+ feet away from the curb on a somewhat narrow street. there have been infestations because they are so "clean".

the reports don't say anything about the person and if it's actually the person who will be living there. in my case, if the landlord wasn't such a cheapskate, he would throw them out and find someone better. i'm guessing that they are paying a few $ more then others and he's willing to see his property get damaged.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kylewest
about 14 years ago
Posts: 4455
Member since: Aug 2007

Where possible, I would insist on contact info from former landlords of the prospective tenants and actually call that reference to discuss. I would also ask about any history of being party to an order of protection, running the prospective tenant's name through legal databases in attempt to find prior litigation (civil or criminal) involving the person. I would ask for a voided check from an active bank account to see what number in the series was on the check--if it is check #101 (the first check ever written on the account) I would reject the person. You are seeking stability, reliability, middle-of-the-road people who come without yellow flags from the get-go. Even with all of this, there are no guarantees, but at least you are better off doing these things than not doing them.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by notadmin
about 14 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

> they came home at 11 pm and blasted music until 1 am daily.

call the police already!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by maly
about 14 years ago
Posts: 1377
Member since: Jan 2009

I've heard more crazy stories about landlords than tenants, even though there are so many more tenants. I wouldn't trust a former landlord (they could just want to get rid of a bum) or past litigation. The best way to weed out potential bad tenants is to ask for references: one from their current boss and one from a close friend. ou can tell a lot about someone from their chosen associates.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Foo
about 14 years ago
Posts: 39
Member since: Feb 2010

ab_11218 - I feel your pain... Back in the 1990's we had neighbors from hell - one night they actually started vacuuming at 1:30 am! My husband went into the cellar, found the master switch to their apartment and shut them down. We ALWAYS live on the top floor now. I carried my fat prego belly and two kids up the 4 flights (plus stoop!). So now 10 years later I remain in great shape and most important we live in peace :) I have watched my landlord deal with many tenants over these last 10 years and have to say that only one was a real 'dink' and they were lucky to have them leave after 1 year.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rb345
about 14 years ago
Posts: 1273
Member since: Jun 2009

ab..11218:

1. a landlord cant terminate a lease or evict without a reason
2. the ocnduct you describe constitutes a "muisance"
3. but most lease breaches can be "cured" without penalty
4. and many courts wont evict unless a nuisance is terribly harmful to others

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lad
about 14 years ago
Posts: 707
Member since: Apr 2009

For some of us who pay everything electronically and don't write checks (I once went three years without doing so), the no check #101 rule could hurt.

The other point I would add is to make your building appealing to the type of tenants you want. E.g., if it's an unrenovated, mouse-infested building with rattling windows and no insulation, your odds of getting desirable tenants are a lot lower.

I've seen landlords really cheap out on certain items - like insulation between the floors of a building - and come to pay for it later on, when otherwise reasonable tenants turn unreasonable because they're hearing their neighbors 24/7.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
about 14 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

"For some of us who pay everything electronically and don't write checks (I once went three years without doing so), the no check #101 rule could hurt."

So start writing checks.

Problem solved.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by maly
about 14 years ago
Posts: 1377
Member since: Jan 2009

No need. i change banks every other year or so, to follow interest-checking and no fee deals. You can ask for your free checkbooks to start at 11396, if you feel so inclined (I pretty much never write checks either.)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ab_11218
about 14 years ago
Posts: 2017
Member since: May 2009

rb,

1 - your
2 - numbering
3 - has gotten
4 - so annoying
5 - that a
6 - response
7 - is not worth it ;)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
about 14 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

There are big differences between the counties. New York County (Manhattan) for example, is extremely tenant-friendly.

But even doing an eviction in a landlord-friendly county will cost you thousands, and if you are a landlord long enough, at some point it will happen. You just build it into your business model.

ali r.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by steve123
about 14 years ago
Posts: 895
Member since: Feb 2009

My former neighbor was
Chain smoking in a furnished apartment
Doing coke
Flushing clothes down the toilet and then calling super to fix clogs
Loud past 3am
Generally insane
Multiple large dogs who weren't getting walked frequently enough...

Some of these incurred fines (to the owner), some of these caused damage to the apartment (plumbing, flooring, fumigating, and i would imagine destroyed some furnishings)

All this in a $1MM apartment in doorman condo in uws...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by downtown1234
about 14 years ago
Posts: 349
Member since: Nov 2007

Check number means nothing. You can order checks starting with whatever number you want from any online or mail order check printer. Maybe checking the check number worked 25 years ago but not anymore.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by grapefruit
about 14 years ago
Posts: 41
Member since: May 2009

Well I have an old couple below who are completely crazy. They moved about a 18 months ago and immediately complained of a motor noise and vibrations on their walls. The super checked all the apartments around them, three times. Also changed their windows, installed new air and heating units for them, changed something in he plumbing - all to no avail. The crazy couple banged on my door at all hours to complain about the noise, left notes under my door, got the management to check my apartment and were convinced that I was making all this noise (while i was not even here). The final straw is that they called the police on me at 11:30 at night, who banged on my door while I was asleep. The next day i called the police and threatened harassment, which seem to have ended the affair. This is a luxury building and i am sure these people had great credit. I can only imagine being a landlord with all these nuts around (i just have to live with them).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hrdnitlr
about 14 years ago
Posts: 149
Member since: Jun 2007

I have a question: is there any correlation between how hands-on the doormen and staff are and whether tenants/owners tend to be crazy?

I think I'm on my 5th NY doorman building now (3 rentals, 2 condos), and in my last two buildings, the doormen were very friendly, and v-e-r-y involved (maybe too involved) in what was going on in the building, who was going in and out, and what they were doing. On my other buildings, the doormen were much more discreet, quiet, less outgoing, and focused more on process (security, keeping track of packages and mail, etc.) than on friendliness.

I've gotten used to the more in-your-face doormen, but I wonder if people who are crazy, and know deep down that they'll probably be causing trouble, are going to self-select into the more anonymous buildings. In other words, people who really don't like scrutiny.

In contrast, if you've got Mr. Chatty/Friendly as your doorman, and you're a jerk or a deadbeat or shall we say super-quirky, word is definitely going to get around. And in addition, the landlord/management co is going to have an information source that can help clear up who's telling the truth in he said/she said situations.

Anyway, I tend to like my privacy but have nothing to hide, so I think I'll put up with more intrusive doormen in return for the benefit of scaring away people who r-e-a-l-l-y don't want any witnesses to what they're up to.

Am I onto something, or is where crazy people end up just random?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by printer
about 14 years ago
Posts: 1219
Member since: Jan 2008

I'd say that crazy is random. the crazies are just as likely to prefer Mr. Chatty b/c that's someone else they can air their list of grievances to.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bgrfrank
about 14 years ago
Posts: 183
Member since: Apr 2010

If you have a well run Coop then the Coop should be the way to keep the wrong type of visitors out so you don't need to give the doormen the power trip. It is up to you and the owners not the doormen being nosey.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment