Skip Navigation

The Board at 230 West End Avenue

Started by fusion345_1772497
almost 10 years ago
Posts: 28
Member since: Sep 2015
Discussion about
I would recommend being very cautious about buying into this building. If you do your checking, you will see that all or most of the units 'for sale' now were 'in contract' two months ago. We tried to buy unit 9f back in September, made all cash offer, had impeccable credentials and references, would have made ideal neighbors. Board strung us along for two months and we had to do the calling to find out we had been rejected. Very bad experience. My question is… why are these four units back on the market? I'd be careful.
Response by fieldschester
almost 10 years ago
Posts: 3525
Member since: Jul 2013

Tell us about you and your family so we have better context to reply.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fusion345_1772497
almost 10 years ago
Posts: 28
Member since: Sep 2015

We are a professional couple living in Portland, Oregon. My husband is one of the most prominent architects of our city. Look up Portland Brewery Blocks and the Portland Armory. His firm designed those and many other significant buildings in Seattle also. He recently had to retire because of Parkinsons. Both of our adult children live on the East Coast, one in New York City, and we thought this would be the ideal time to move there. We are an incredibly close family. I have worked in the news business for years, as a reporter and anchor. I took time off to raise my family and now am planning to go through the NYCf teachers fellows program, hoping to make a difference in a school in NYC with special needs. I was born in Seville, Spain, grew up in New Jersey and moved out West 25 years ago for a job. We made an all cash offer, had excellent financials and impeccable reference letters, some of which were from our current neighbors who went on and on to say what decent, kind and interesting neighbors we are. We were so excited.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 16 Comments
  2. 13 Comments