Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Post Closing Liquidity

Started by Ernest
almost 6 years ago
Posts: 50
Member since: Nov 2017
I'm curious about how much post-closing liquidity the board at The San Remo and The Beresford require. I'd heard that UWS is more lenient than UES, in general, but this is high end.
Response by KeithBurkhardt
almost 6 years ago
Posts: 2986
Member since: Aug 2008

If you have to ask...; )

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 6 years ago
Posts: 9877
Member since: Mar 2009

∞%

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by George
almost 6 years ago
Posts: 1327
Member since: Jul 2017

Isn't the question what multiple of the purchase price is required to be sitting in your bank account?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by RE10023
almost 6 years ago
Posts: 74
Member since: May 2011

I believe that is correct. It's been awhile, but we looked at a $2.5MM apartment (coop) on CPW, and as I recall you had to have 5MM in liquid assets after purchase. We looked at another, same caliber building if skewing a little less "important" and there were 2X as well.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
almost 6 years ago
Posts: 10570
Member since: Feb 2007

2x purchase price is indeed very onerous. But UWS is still very much in demand relative to other locations looking at resales market pulse from Urbandigs. And high flip tax paid by the buyer!! Crazy.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Ernest
almost 6 years ago
Posts: 50
Member since: Nov 2017

Maybe this is correct with San Remo, but I understood that El Dorado was much more lenient--and that many non-CPW UWS coops (still very nice ones) only called for 2 x annual maintenance.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
almost 6 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

There's such a range. The last nice non-CPW UWS co-op I put a buyer in required .35X post-closing liquidity.

ali r.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment