Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Coops / Condos that do NOt allow pets

Started by sharise
over 17 years ago
Posts: 46
Member since: Oct 2007
Discussion about
Does anyone know of any coops or condods in Manhattan that do not allow pets? Thanks.
Response by babsie02
over 17 years ago
Posts: 139
Member since: Mar 2008

45 Tudor City Place

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by julia
over 17 years ago
Posts: 2841
Member since: Feb 2007

The listings will state the pet policy

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by julia
over 17 years ago
Posts: 2841
Member since: Feb 2007

tudor city allows cats, not dogs

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by uesowner
over 17 years ago
Posts: 47
Member since: Apr 2007

One agent told me that "no pets" really just means "no dogs." Is this true?

And what is the reason a building would have a no pets policy, anyway? How are such things even enforced?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by johnrealestate1
over 17 years ago
Posts: 131
Member since: Jul 2008

No. "No pets" means no pets. The spectrum runs something like this:

No pets / cats allowed / small dogs allowed / dogs allowed. A "small" dog is usually defined as under "X" lbs, although in one case I've seen a height maximum. I wouldn't suggest trying to move in with seven cats, and a pit bull might be a problem, too.

The reason is pretty obvious - not everyone is an animal lover, and animals can, and do, "mess up". The terms are spelled out in your lease, if renting, and by house rules / by-laws, if you own. It's pretty simple - the pet goes, or you do.

How would they find out? Assuming no doorman, a complaint to the management company.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by uesowner
over 17 years ago
Posts: 47
Member since: Apr 2007

Reason I wonder about it: Our building (we own but don't live there) has a "no pets" rule. It's a small co-op with 28 apartments. Almost everyone there has a cat. I once saw someone walking out of the building with a large dog. The pets do not seem to pose any problems (the times I have been there, I have not noticed noise or odors). In conversations with other tenants, the subject has not come up. There is no doorman and no live-in super.

Also, isn't there some law in NYC whereby if you maintain a pet in an apartment for a certain amount of time with no complaints from other tenants or the management, you are entitled to keep that pet?

BTW, as a landlord, I am fully aware of the damage pets can do.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by babsie02
over 17 years ago
Posts: 139
Member since: Mar 2008

if you keep a pet open and notorious for 6 months (or is it 3?), the landlord or coop board cannot do anything. they have essentially waived it then.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sharise
over 17 years ago
Posts: 46
Member since: Oct 2007

You are right john. Not everyone is an animal lover. This is why I posed the question. I'm looking to buy but only if I don’t have to deal with neighbors with animals! I have a rental right now. The upstairs neighbor’s dog barks all the time. This unfortunately has turned me off to buying in a coop/condo that allows pets.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sharise
over 17 years ago
Posts: 46
Member since: Oct 2007

any other suggestions? there have to places other than tudor city.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by babsie02
over 17 years ago
Posts: 139
Member since: Mar 2008

the agent should tell you if there is a pet policy and it is usually posted on the broker's site.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kas242
over 17 years ago
Posts: 332
Member since: May 2008

Sharise: Tell you broker to look for buildings that do not allow pets.

Babsie02: it's a 90-day period, after which the pet is considered accepted if no one from the management agency, staff, or residential community raises an objection.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by johnrealestate1
over 17 years ago
Posts: 131
Member since: Jul 2008

sharise - absolute "No Pet" buildings are a minority. My last closing was a Studio on the UES for a buyer client. My buyer had no preference to pet friendly / unfriendly - she had no pets - but the building policy was NO pets. FYI - it's not a luxury, doorman building, just a very nice elevator building in the East 80's.

Not being an attorney, I'd love to hear more about "open and notorious" pets in "No Pet" buildings. The bulk of my work is Co-op resales, and the buyer(s)' purchase application / Board package ALWAYS states the pet policy, and even in cases where pets are allowed, specifically asks the prospective buyer(s) about any pets they plan on bringing into the building.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by uptowngal
over 17 years ago
Posts: 631
Member since: Sep 2006

The broker should know if there is a pet policy. If not definitely the management company would know.

Some buildings that don't allow pets or dogs may grandfather tenants who already owned at the time the rule was established. This is why you might see someone with a dog in a 'no dog's allowed' building.

There are many reasons why buildings don't allow dogs. One is that, unfortunately, some tenants are not as responsible as others. My former building allowed dogs and once in a blue moon they would leave messes in the hallways/elevators and the owners wouldn't clean up after them - yuk.

My current building used to allow dogs but as more families with small children moved in, some kids were getting scared by large barking dogs. It's a small building with no service elevator so the tenants voted against having dogs.

Then there's also the cost & safety issues - like what happened with that woman in SF whose neighbor's dog mauled her to death. Extreme and rare case I know but it has resulted in insurance premiums to increase for some buildings that allow dogs.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by secondandc
over 17 years ago
Posts: 121
Member since: Mar 2008

If you sign on the package saying you will not have pets, and then bring a pet, that is an attempt to conceal which goes against the "open and notorious". This is all vaguely similar to adverse possession in places where there is actually land you could adversely possess.

The actual part of the city code is here:
http://www.housingnyc.com/html/resources/hmc/sub2/art1.html#27-2009.1

A more detailed discussion is here:
http://www.tenant.net/Rights/pets.html

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kylewest
over 17 years ago
Posts: 4455
Member since: Aug 2007

11 Fifth Ave, the Brevoort, is a dog-less building. I can understand a weight limit, but none at all seems extreme and to suggest an annoying board and population in the building.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bela
over 17 years ago
Posts: 183
Member since: Jul 2008

just go into keyword during new york times search and type no pets or no dogs

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
over 17 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

Buildings can flop back and forth over time -- the John Adams at 101 West 12th allowed dogs, and then someone's dog bit someone, and new dogs were excluded but the old dogs were grandfathered in -- and then they relaxed again -- so it's always good to check with the board as well as to see what's stated. But I think Executive Plaza on West 51st is pet-free.

ali r.
{downtown broker}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malraux
over 17 years ago
Posts: 809
Member since: Dec 2007

What about my pet ferrett, "farfel?"

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sharise
over 17 years ago
Posts: 46
Member since: Oct 2007

johnrealestate1 - WHAT'S the name of the building on the east side in the 80s?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by DebbyKlein
over 17 years ago
Posts: 3
Member since: Jan 2008

The Horizon Condo 415 East 37th has no pet policy

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by dman
over 17 years ago
Posts: 7
Member since: Feb 2006

But is it cheaper to own a dog then to rent one?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by wavedeva
over 17 years ago
Posts: 209
Member since: Jan 2006

kylewest-
For the record I am a dog and cat lover. However, after moving from a floor in my condominium which had no dogs to a floor which has several dogs, I can see why some buildings have a no dog policy. The hall carpet on the floor with no dogs is pristine--looks and feels brand new. The hall carpet on the floor with dogs has several spots from dog "accidents" and looks and feels worn. Therefore, a no dog policy has nothing to do with "an annoying board and population in a building". Unfortunately, some owners don't train their pets well (we had one dog in my condo who would attack other dogs, his nickname was Cujo)/don't clean up after their pets/allow their dogs to urinate on the building, etc. It's not rocket science that having dogs in the building causes greater maintenance costs--in terms of both labor and materials. Moreover, there are some people who are allergic to dogs and cats and would love to live in a no pet building. Moreover, I can certainly sympathize with sharise since I've had the situation where a neighbor had a dog which barked daily nonstop for 4+ hours until someone can home. I could hear the barking in every room in my apartment. Moreover, I couldn't even go into the foyer of my own apartment without the dog starting to bark!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by uesowner
over 17 years ago
Posts: 47
Member since: Apr 2007

Our board and management are very no-nonsense, so I've been thinking they have the rule for financial or legal reasons. It was in place when we bought the apartment.

sharise, it sounds like you just don't want dogs because of the noise. Cats are usually not a problem in that regard.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malraux
over 17 years ago
Posts: 809
Member since: Dec 2007

What about my pet weasel, "stevejhx?"

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sharise
over 17 years ago
Posts: 46
Member since: Oct 2007

malraux if you have nothing useful to post please do not post here. Thanks.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malraux
over 17 years ago
Posts: 809
Member since: Dec 2007

Open up your arms and let the sunshine in, sharise....

For the record we have one (black) cat and one (blue merle) dog. Your question is very vague. There are lots of coops in Manhattan that don't allow pets. Like on Fifth Avenue, Park Avenue, and Madison Avenue in the UES, just for starters. Many old money pre war building have policies of this type (why, I don't know - to quote Michael Douglas in the movie 'Wall Street' - "That's the thing you gotta remember about WASPs - they love animals, they can't stand people.")

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by johnrealestate1
over 17 years ago
Posts: 131
Member since: Jul 2008

sharise - no name - it's a 43 unit, very nice elevator (no doorman) building on East 87th, about a four minute walk to the subway station. If you'd like, email me at johnrealestate1@optonline.net, and I'll forward you info on the building. And, if you're interested, the asking price of the apartment, and what we were able to get it for.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by barskaya
over 17 years ago
Posts: 190
Member since: Jan 2008

sharise,
Ali is absolutely right. If building has "No pets" rule, find out for how long it was in place. Because you may still run into grandfathered dogs. (cats I wouldn't worry since they stay inside individual apartments and don't bark)

elena
(broker)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by uws_buyer
over 17 years ago
Posts: 29
Member since: Nov 2007

The Monarch Condo- 200 E89th.. no dogs.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bramstar
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1909
Member since: May 2008

""(cats I wouldn't worry since they stay inside individual apartments and don't bark)""

They may not bark but... there's a family in our (rental) building that lets their two cats roam happily in the hall. The cats' favorite game is to lie in wait until someone, anyone, opens a door, then scurry in quick as lightning. I've seen the canny little bastards skulking at the heels of delivery men, prepared and ready to dart into some poor unsuspecting tenant's apartment. They make a beeline for the bed, couch, upholstered chair--anything that can be clawed and covered with fur in the 50-odd seconds it takes to wrangle them out.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by uptowngal
over 17 years ago
Posts: 631
Member since: Sep 2006

bramster, has anyone complained to the building management? Unless they don't mind the kitties invading their space.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bramstar
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1909
Member since: May 2008

Uptowngal--

Not that I'm aware of... it honestly doesn't bother us terribly--don't know about other folks, though.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by BigApple
about 17 years ago
Posts: 85
Member since: Sep 2008

Just fyi though, buildings that don't allow dogs tend to sit longer on the market and command less money when you go to sell. For that reason, I would never buy in a no dog building. It's my biggest investment and I want to make sure I maximize the returns when I go to sell.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by brainwashedconsumer
about 17 years ago
Posts: 76
Member since: Apr 2008

Hi BigApple, do you think you can email me privately on creativeproperty@yahoo.com , I desparately need your advice.

Cheers

BWC

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cccharley
about 17 years ago
Posts: 903
Member since: Sep 2008

Monarch is one example of a building that used to allow pets - then they decided no more pets. My parents live there

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kylewest
about 17 years ago
Posts: 4455
Member since: Aug 2007

My parents UES building makes dogs use the service elevator and enter/exit through a nasty back hall. Even carrying a small dog is not permitted. A little extreme and uptight IMO. I can understand for larger dogs that shed on people and drool and jump. But a dog you can carry in one arm is banished from civilized entry and exit? Makes no sense.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment