Skip Navigation

NYC: real estate to plummet another 47%

Started by HimWhoKnows
over 17 years ago
Posts: 147
Member since: Jul 2007
Discussion about
http://www.businessinsider.com/nyc-real-estate-could-fall-another-47-2009-3 i said this about 3 months ago. by the way, a wise investor pays attention to: April 6.
Response by mwade
over 17 years ago
Posts: 137
Member since: Mar 2009

what is April 6th?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fakeestate
over 17 years ago
Posts: 215
Member since: Nov 2008

Does anyone have a link to the original Deutsche Bank report that is referenced?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by HimWhoKnows
over 17 years ago
Posts: 147
Member since: Jul 2007

manhattan real estate brokers, in large, and unfortunately like the homesellers themselves completely delusional with the current econ-situation.

My prediction is Manhattan real estate drops another 65% from current levels as major corporations downsize manhattan presence and NYC taxes increase year over year.

Another 65% drop from current levels, thoughts?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cfranch
over 17 years ago
Posts: 270
Member since: Feb 2009

I am loathe to make predictions as to how far RE prices go but clearly the path is down. I want to buy but need signs of a bottom:

A big surge in listings in a short period

Some notable bankrupcies of developers and RE firms

Extremely bearish articles in real estate boosting publications like the NY Times

Heads of RE firms throwing in the towel and finally saying "maybe this isn't a good time to buy, but a great time to rent"

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by HT1
over 17 years ago
Posts: 396
Member since: Mar 2009

first RE auction in Manhattan
that will set new price levels

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jasonkyle
over 17 years ago
Posts: 891
Member since: Sep 2008

what projects will be on auction? where will it be? inquiring minds are dying to know.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by HimWhoKnows
over 17 years ago
Posts: 147
Member since: Jul 2007

Manhattan: 100-140K studio, 160-250K 1 bedroom/doorman, 300-500K 2 bedroom/doorman.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sniper
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1069
Member since: Dec 2008

"a big surge in listings in a short period"

with listings at around 11,000 now and the RE market in a buyer/seller stand-off would the "big surge" basically be from desperation sellers?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by HimWhoKnows
over 17 years ago
Posts: 147
Member since: Jul 2007

likely see inventory at the 30-50K level in next 12-18months.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by waverly
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1638
Member since: Jul 2008

"likely see inventory at the 30-50K level in next 12-18months"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA......so funny. I think inventory will go to 1 million. HWK = Him Who Likes To Shoot His Mouth Off And Predict Things With No Evidence To Support Him...or HWLTSHMOAPTWNETSH.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jasonkyle
over 17 years ago
Posts: 891
Member since: Sep 2008

Isn't it possible that with shadow inventory and all the held back units in the condos that are in various stages of being built we are already well over 20,000. Is 30K so impossible to believe. It does sound unlikely though.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Augustus
over 17 years ago
Posts: 36
Member since: Aug 2007

Realistically, I think prices will go down another 30 - 40% in the next 6 months. Who can say after that?

I say this b/c
1. the recession is now world-wide, so foreign buyers aren't jumping at condos here anymore.
2. pay is way down, not just in law, publishing, and finance, but all over. Retailers are also desperate. NYC is not even training new police recruits - they cancelled this year's January incoming class.
3. pay will not recover on Wall St. this year, even though banks will produce greatly improved earnings. my bonus was down 80% and many i know were laid off or got nothing. these ppl are facing selling their second homes and dumping their cars just to pay their income tax bill from last year. wall street salaries are very middle class by manhattan standards - a lot of managing directors top out at 200k. with no bonus, 2 kids in private school, a stay at home wife.... well, it doesn't go very far in this city.
4. there are a lot of apts on streeteasy that have already had the prices cut 30%, but they are still above $900 - $1000 sq/ft in 30 year old co-ops. C'mon. Get that down to $500-600 /sq ft with maintenace not over $1.50 per sq ft and I am ready to buy.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cfranch
over 17 years ago
Posts: 270
Member since: Feb 2009

exactly sniper. owners panic and start dumping. i break current owners into 3 categories:

New: bought within last 3-4 years and are severely underwater. if their asset falls 50% it has to rise 100% to get to break even. best to cut and run especially if you're older than 45.

Old: hey your asset has increased in value but it is eroding fast. your stock portfolio and 401K are in the toilet. not your only performing asset is threatening to go negative. might as well sell with a smaller profit.

Foreign: you bought when dollar was weak. not that it is stronger your asset has increased in value that much more. but with the dollar again weakening and RE prices falling you sell to preserve your gain.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alpine292
over 17 years ago
Posts: 2771
Member since: Jun 2008

consdierign that most co-ops require downpayments of 20-25%, I think the number of underwater owners is quite small. In fact, NY has the smallest percentage of underwater homeowners in the nation.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cfranch
over 17 years ago
Posts: 270
Member since: Feb 2009

yes but every new building that has gone up has been condo

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 17 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

Oh, sure, alpine. During the orgy of this past decade there weren't any coop owners who lived beyond their means, were there? Bought the coop in 2000, bought the place in the Hamptons in 2006, bonus cut in half, can't sell the place in the Hamptons ......

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alpine292
over 17 years ago
Posts: 2771
Member since: Jun 2008

buying a house in the Hamptons does not make you upside down on your co-op.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by waverly
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1638
Member since: Jul 2008

I agree with alpine on underwater numbers. There are some, but less in NYC than most posters predict. If things get a lot worse, of course, more people will be affected.

jasonkyle - I agree with you that inventory is rising, is slightly higher than advertised and will continue to rise. However, saying 50k inventory in 12 months just takes away from a very useful and productive discussion and moves into the realm of ridiculously extreme predictions with no evidence, and that is less than helpful.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 17 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

no, but if enough people are forced to sell, it lowers the prices and you just might wind up underwater. if you bought 2007 or later, you probably are underwater with few exceptions if you put down 20-25%. As not that many coops sell in any given year, from a mathematical standpoint waverly is right. but as not that many coops sell in any given year, the addition of a small number of distressed buyers in a highly illiquid environment can crush prices.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by waverly
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1638
Member since: Jul 2008

Consider this example:

You bought a co-op in 2005 and got it at a reasonable price (all jokes aside for a moment) with 20% down. It increased in value from 2005 (certainly has decreased lately) and you paid off 4 years of principle which probably equals about another 5% or so of the mortgage. It is tough to get this person underwater today. I am not suggesting that it couldn't happen, just that it is not a given and that NYC is not rife with underwater apartments.

70% of NYC are co-ops. Many of them are more than 20% down buildings. Many were purchased prior to 2007. Many of these were priced far more reasonably than condos.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by MMAfia
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1071
Member since: Feb 2007

hey, HimWhoKnows, just out of curiosity, do you know what an fmno is?

=D

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cfranch
over 17 years ago
Posts: 270
Member since: Feb 2009

waverly not doubting your numbers but your are viewing RE as apart from people's other assets. the example you cite has the co-op as a performing asset albeit losing profitability as we speak, with no bottom in sight. in the meatime jobs are less secure, taxes and common charges rising and 401K's and other stock holdings in the toilet. the temptation to sell is great.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by waverly
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1638
Member since: Jul 2008

cfranch - I totally agree with you that some of these co-op owners (and perhaps co-ops, although I think this will be extremely rare) could be in trouble now or soon enough based on jobs, bonuses, debt, illnesses, bad decisions, etc. The situation can, and likely will, get worse before it gets better. I just wanted to point out that I didn't think NYC was uniformly underwater and that the discussion seemed to indicate that (or at least give the impression).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
over 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

cfranch,

You think all owners should sell, basically? I have a hard time buying that.

" if you bought 2007 or later, you probably are underwater with few exceptions if you put down 20-25%."

At what point do we implement more of a cut-off date here? I mean, if the market is down 25%, you can't really lump people buying now in with those who bought in 2007 (peak), can you?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
over 17 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

cfrench,
Included are also the ReFi group. They bought low and ReFi high, in a sense they re-bought at the top of the market. This is a large group!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 17 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

bjw, being underwater is just like having a bad asset on your books. It doesn't matter until you need it to do something. For most people being underwater will cause them to hold on tight and batten down the hatches. So you can't lump people at all, really. But, of course, there are those for whom it does matter and then...

You can't set a firm cut-off date because it's a moving target, and quite possibly a quickly moving one. This quarter's figures are always based on contracts signed in the past. An honest broker can tell you what things are actually going to contract for today, but that info is pretty hard to get. I have some info, but I don't feel comfortable sharing it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cfranch
over 17 years ago
Posts: 270
Member since: Feb 2009

I think there are 2 factors in deciding whether to buy, sell or hold. One is looking at hard numbers and figuring out what to do in one's particular situation. Unfortunately emotions play a large role in money decisions. The emotional landscape these decisions are being made in is at best, uncertain but really quite bleak. Fear and greed rule markets of any asset class. Greed got us ridiculous RE prices, fear will bring us down. We overshot to the upside and I expect we will overshoot to the downside as people panic. The same thing plays out in the stock market with the internet stock bubble a prime example.

BJ:you're right I probably shouldn't have lumped in people who bought recently at 15-25% off peak but they still have to be worried that they got in too soon. I see no signs of a bottom.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
over 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

aboutready, I agree. Everyone's situation is tied to so many variables that it's not easy to speak in generalities. People that need to sell right now though are looking at tough times. I'm not sure that anyone who doesn't need to sell in the next 5+ years should feel the need to unload so quickly though.

Totally agree that good, current contract price data is very tough to get. I think we'll get there eventually, but for now we'll have to live with the lagging quarterly figures. Jonathan Miller wrote a good piece about this: http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=3043

cfranch, I agree, no concrete signs of a bottom here, though I think people who are buying now are aware they're not getting the optimal price, but are content getting the home they want now for less than they would have paid 18 months ago.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by HimWhoKnows
over 17 years ago
Posts: 147
Member since: Jul 2007

Goldman Sachs predicts another 44% decline and now Deutsche Bank is out with a note suggesting a whopping 47% decline from today's level in the cards.

Still HimWhoKnows re-int a 65% drop from current levels. a 18% higher level than executives at DB.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by HimWhoKnows
over 17 years ago
Posts: 147
Member since: Jul 2007

George Soros is also out a very cautious note on commercial real estate...

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment