Skip Navigation

Landlord contract clause legal?

Started by zbe
over 16 years ago
Posts: 21
Member since: May 2009
Discussion about
My landlord (they own 10 or so apts in a couple different condo buildings in midtown east - not a large, established landlord) has a clause in my rental agreement that says that I have to pay for all cleaning / painting to the apartment so that it is in MOVE IN condition for the next tenant. This clearly differs from the "broom swept" and "normal wear and tear" standard that I have always thought was normal practice. Is this legally enforceable? This is not a rent controlled building.
Response by kylewest
over 16 years ago
Posts: 4455
Member since: Aug 2007

Enforceable or not (I am aware of no reason why it wouldn't be enforceable), you are going to get into a situation with this LL. If the clause is struck but this is what is on the LL's mind, it seems you will never get back your full deposit since the LL will claim you did enough damage to necessitate repairs and deduct it from your deposit. Then what will you do? Go to court over $500? Doubtful. Either prepare yourself to deal with such a LL or move on.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
over 16 years ago
Posts: 9880
Member since: Mar 2009

If you agree to it and sign, it's legal and enforceable (although there's a big difference between "legally enforceable" and economically feasible to sue you for. but you may want to think that you'll be writing off whatever security deposit you put down.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by manhattanfox
over 16 years ago
Posts: 1275
Member since: Sep 2007

in this life, you get what you negotiate, not what you deserve....

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment