Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Unpublished listings

Started by steve123
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 895
Member since: Feb 2009
Discussion about
Was curious how common it was for an apartment to be for sale, but unlisted. I'm not even sure if "unlisted" is the right term for this. I know of an apartment for sale, through one of the big firm brokers in Manhattan. It has already had showings, and is shortly having an open house. However, the apartment is not listed on the brokers website, nor streeteasy. The building is a ~100 unit condo, and other units in the building are on streeteasy. Any idea what's going on?
Response by jim_hones10
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 3413
Member since: Jan 2010

if that broker is a member of rebny, and they have a signed agreement with the owner, it MUST be listed withinn 48 hours.

perhaps the listing broker doesn't have an exlusive, but a handshake agreement with the owner to advertise the apartment.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by MRussell
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 276
Member since: Jan 2010

Is the apartment incredibly expensive? That tends to be the case. That or it is owned by someone of interest.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

steve, our industry term is "pocket listing" -- (though I like "gray inventory" too). It is technically a violation of the rules of our trade association -- REBNY -- but it has always happened. Generally the explanation is that the seller craves privacy.

ali r.

DG Neary Realty

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by gcondo
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 1111
Member since: Feb 2009

This is why I love realtors...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jim_hones10
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 3413
Member since: Jan 2010

i wouldn't find it too unlikely if the owner didn't want to sign the exlusive agreement, but agreed to pay a commission to the broker if they bring a buyer.

gcondo, what offends you about this?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Or you can go halfway and put it on the broker's site but without an address. E.g., Joan Rivers' condo at http://www.sothebyshomes.com/nyc/sales/0016359 but not at http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/1-east-62-street-manhattan

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by tbontb
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 56
Member since: Dec 2008

I have seen some sponsor units that are not listed.

I think some of these sponsors prefer "sell-direct".
However, no clue how to get these information properly. The two I saw are through my buyer's broker (who knows someone in the sponsor firm). According to the rep from sponsor... these apartments sell themselves so they don't advertise...

I did not go for it but certainly made me curious.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

My sponsor uses an independent broker who pretty much limits herself to sponsor sales in a few buildings. Until recently she didn't feed to SE.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ab_11218
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2017
Member since: May 2009

many sponsors and some sellers don't want to pay the full commission and don't want to sign exclusives. the sponsors especially, have brokers begging for listings. when one of those apartments become available, they know that 5-10-50 brokers will start bringing their buyers in. they save money and get a sale.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by steve123
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 895
Member since: Feb 2009

To clarify, this is not a sponsor unit, and owner is not a public figure.
I am a tenant in a condo, whose landlord (individual owner) is selling.
Not a super high end property (1BR, similar units in building are in the 700-900K range).
While I don't know whether there is any sort of signed exclusive, I do know the seller is definetely using a specific broker (not 5-10 brokers).
Apartment isn't even listed if you go to brokers webpage and look at the agent's listings.

Seems like an odd way to sell an apartment, another form of "shadow inventory", perhaps?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jim_hones10
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 3413
Member since: Jan 2010

jim_hones10
about 2 hours ago
ignore this person
report abuse i wouldn't find it too unlikely if the owner didn't want to sign the exlusive agreement, but agreed to pay a commission to the broker if they bring a buyer.

from about 4 hours ago...you can all hypothesize, then come to a conclusion, or you can listen to someone who knows what there are talking about from the start.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ab_11218
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2017
Member since: May 2009

i'm guessing that since you still live there, this will be a + for you. if they would do a full listing, you would be innundated with viewing.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 9877
Member since: Mar 2009

I agree with jim that this is a likely answer:

"perhaps the listing broker doesn't have an exlusive, but a handshake agreement with the owner to advertise the apartment."

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mimi
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 1134
Member since: Sep 2008

Hey 30yrs you were greatly missed!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Yes, good to see you back.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

yes, indeed. we've lost quite a few recently. very glad to have you back.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by MRussell
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 276
Member since: Jan 2010

I think jim_hones10 is right. Considering what you have told us, they probably didn't want to sign an exclusive agreement.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by KeithB
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 976
Member since: Aug 2009

REBNY allows this if the seller has specified he/she only wants one broker to handle the sale. Probably only wants to pay a 2-3% commission.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kharby2
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 279
Member since: Oct 2009

Jim, the REBNY rule about exclusive listings is 24 hours, not 48 hours. I just went to the required class this week.

And yes, the seller's instructions trump REBNY rules about exclusive listings, of course. That's consistent with NYS law. If the seller says I don't want you to put it up on such-and-such website, then you don't do it. That's one thing fiduciary responsibility means, and agents have a fiduciary responsibility to their clients (be they sellers or buyers).

Street Easy only accepts exclusive broker listings. If the seller is For Sale By Owner (FSBO), aka open listing, who wants me to show the apartment to my buyers, then it cannot be posted on Street Easy. I just sold an apartment like that this week. It was never listed on Street Easy.

This is not a violation of REBNY rules, REBNY rules only pertain to exclusive listing agreements.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by steve123
over 15 years ago
Posts: 895
Member since: Feb 2009

For completions sake-
He was originally shopping it to a neighbor, but that fell through.
Apparently he sold to a board member, so there probably was never a "listing".

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by printer
over 15 years ago
Posts: 1219
Member since: Jan 2008

are they letting you re-new your lease?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment