Impact of maintenance on price/value in a prewar 8
Started by bobnovak
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 30
Member since: Apr 2007
Discussion about
How do you think about the relationship between monthly maintenance? In other words, let's assume that the "average" Classic 8 pre-war that needs to be renovated is $3.750m and the maintenance is $4,500/month. If the maintenance on a similar Classic 8 is $7,000/month, what should the price be? One way to do it is to look at the difference ($2,500) multiply by 12 to get to $30k and then divide by the current cost to borrow (4.0%) and get $750k as the adjustment. In this case the value would be $3.000m. Thoughts?
an appraiser once told me you can also argue that avg hold time for an apt is 6-7 years. So you can take the added expense per year and multiply by 6 or 7. In this case that would be 180k to 240k. But I think the market in reality would probably be closer to your method.
Your method is what the selling broker proposed. Needless to say, there's a big difference between the two.
Regarding Classic 8s, what do people think the market is for them on the UES?
>an appraiser once told me you can also argue that avg hold time for an apt is 6-7 years. So you can take the added expense per year and multiply by 6 or 7.
Why would you even repeat crap like that?
Who cares about the average hold time? The extraordinary maintenance burden isn't going to revert to the mean over 6-7 years. It will continue being an albatross around the apartment's neck and should be accounted for as such.
Seller's broker is either intentionally misleading you and/or doesn't understand the basic principles of the time value of money.
agree with flarf - at the end of 6-7 years someone else will do the calculation and ding the apartment due to higher maintenance. my view is do the terminal value of this cash flow stream, 4% is reasonalbe so first way to calculate it is correct.
higher mntnce should be treated not like a mtge, but as a perpetual--plot the inflation-compounded differential 10 years out--ouch--always buy the lesser mntnce, higher priced comp
Here's another way to go at it. How much would it rent for? That will give you a place that costs $0 upfront with monthlies of X.
Your 4% rule would put it at a $17K rent. Sounds a bit rich.
"always buy the lesser mntnce, higher priced comp"
The point being there is a continuing bubble in prices. As soon as maintenance starts approaching rents, a light bulb goes off in buyer's head. However, bad math / I can afford it / the "psychic" benefits of ownership as some here call it dominate in your buyer's cloudy head so long as maintenance is far from rent.
All other things being equal, I agree.
However, given the Board Req's at some of these buildings, it's a lot easier to "qualify" for an apartment with a materially lower purchase price (even if it's due to the high maintenance)
not necessarily bob--most boards require you can can show liquid assets, in excess of whatever your downpayment will be, in an amount that relates to your ongoing monthlies
ie a bldg might require 50% down + (60 (5 years) * (mntnce + mtge pmt))
One (not so novel) point to add - it may help you to better understand what drives the difference in maintenance between apartments/co-ops, and form a view as to whether you think that differential stays/collapses longer term. I mention it only because I've seen situations where maintenance has stayed relatively flat for unnaturally long periods of time, only to ratchet up dramatically (2-3x inflation) over the course of a few years (I'm living it right now!). And when you get serious about a place, do thorough diligence on the co-op's financials, historical/forecasted operating expenses/capex/headcount, services/amenities offered, etc. - this will help you round out your picture of maintenance to get a better sense for how it may grow longer term.
I'm a novice at this, but doesn't it matter how well the building is actually maintained and what services are provided?
Ioanada:
How did you get $17k/month?
More generally, what do people think the current market value is for a Classic 8 in estate condition on the UES assuming a normal maintenance?
"How did you get $17k/month?"
I just took your example to the extreme. You started with $4.5K maintenance and $3.75M price. You then applied your 4% rule to translate $2.5K additional maintenance to a $0.75M price drop, so $7.0K maintenance and $3.0M price. I just applied that 4 more times to get to $17.0K maintenance and $0.0M price. At that point, things look awfully similar to renting.
>I just applied that 4 more times to get to $17.0K maintenance and $0.0M price.
Wow, in Columbia County, you could practically buy a house for $17K