Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Impact of maintenance on price/value in a prewar 8

Started by bobnovak
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 30
Member since: Apr 2007
Discussion about
How do you think about the relationship between monthly maintenance? In other words, let's assume that the "average" Classic 8 pre-war that needs to be renovated is $3.750m and the maintenance is $4,500/month. If the maintenance on a similar Classic 8 is $7,000/month, what should the price be? One way to do it is to look at the difference ($2,500) multiply by 12 to get to $30k and then divide by the current cost to borrow (4.0%) and get $750k as the adjustment. In this case the value would be $3.000m. Thoughts?
Response by urbandigs
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 3629
Member since: Jan 2006

an appraiser once told me you can also argue that avg hold time for an apt is 6-7 years. So you can take the added expense per year and multiply by 6 or 7. In this case that would be 180k to 240k. But I think the market in reality would probably be closer to your method.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bobnovak
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 30
Member since: Apr 2007

Your method is what the selling broker proposed. Needless to say, there's a big difference between the two.

Regarding Classic 8s, what do people think the market is for them on the UES?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>an appraiser once told me you can also argue that avg hold time for an apt is 6-7 years. So you can take the added expense per year and multiply by 6 or 7.

Why would you even repeat crap like that?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by flarf
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 515
Member since: Jan 2011

Who cares about the average hold time? The extraordinary maintenance burden isn't going to revert to the mean over 6-7 years. It will continue being an albatross around the apartment's neck and should be accounted for as such.

Seller's broker is either intentionally misleading you and/or doesn't understand the basic principles of the time value of money.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by JButton
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 447
Member since: Sep 2011

agree with flarf - at the end of 6-7 years someone else will do the calculation and ding the apartment due to higher maintenance. my view is do the terminal value of this cash flow stream, 4% is reasonalbe so first way to calculate it is correct.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Wbottom
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 2142
Member since: May 2010

higher mntnce should be treated not like a mtge, but as a perpetual--plot the inflation-compounded differential 10 years out--ouch--always buy the lesser mntnce, higher priced comp

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

Here's another way to go at it. How much would it rent for? That will give you a place that costs $0 upfront with monthlies of X.

Your 4% rule would put it at a $17K rent. Sounds a bit rich.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

"always buy the lesser mntnce, higher priced comp"

The point being there is a continuing bubble in prices. As soon as maintenance starts approaching rents, a light bulb goes off in buyer's head. However, bad math / I can afford it / the "psychic" benefits of ownership as some here call it dominate in your buyer's cloudy head so long as maintenance is far from rent.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bobnovak
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 30
Member since: Apr 2007

All other things being equal, I agree.

However, given the Board Req's at some of these buildings, it's a lot easier to "qualify" for an apartment with a materially lower purchase price (even if it's due to the high maintenance)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Wbottom
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 2142
Member since: May 2010

not necessarily bob--most boards require you can can show liquid assets, in excess of whatever your downpayment will be, in an amount that relates to your ongoing monthlies

ie a bldg might require 50% down + (60 (5 years) * (mntnce + mtge pmt))

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by EBOC
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Feb 2012

One (not so novel) point to add - it may help you to better understand what drives the difference in maintenance between apartments/co-ops, and form a view as to whether you think that differential stays/collapses longer term. I mention it only because I've seen situations where maintenance has stayed relatively flat for unnaturally long periods of time, only to ratchet up dramatically (2-3x inflation) over the course of a few years (I'm living it right now!). And when you get serious about a place, do thorough diligence on the co-op's financials, historical/forecasted operating expenses/capex/headcount, services/amenities offered, etc. - this will help you round out your picture of maintenance to get a better sense for how it may grow longer term.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by RogerF
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Apr 2011

I'm a novice at this, but doesn't it matter how well the building is actually maintained and what services are provided?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bobnovak
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 30
Member since: Apr 2007

Ioanada:

How did you get $17k/month?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bobnovak
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 30
Member since: Apr 2007

More generally, what do people think the current market value is for a Classic 8 in estate condition on the UES assuming a normal maintenance?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

"How did you get $17k/month?"

I just took your example to the extreme. You started with $4.5K maintenance and $3.75M price. You then applied your 4% rule to translate $2.5K additional maintenance to a $0.75M price drop, so $7.0K maintenance and $3.0M price. I just applied that 4 more times to get to $17.0K maintenance and $0.0M price. At that point, things look awfully similar to renting.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>I just applied that 4 more times to get to $17.0K maintenance and $0.0M price.

Wow, in Columbia County, you could practically buy a house for $17K

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment