Mortgage stops lending-
Started by dco
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1319
Member since: Mar 2008
Discussion about
IndyMac Stops New Loans, to Cut 3,800 Jobs Topics:Subprime Lending | Credit | Mortgages Sectors:Financial Services Companies:IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.By Reuters | 08 Jul 2008 | 06:07 AM ET Font size: IndyMac Bancorp, one of the largest U.S. mortgage lenders, said on Monday it will eliminate 3,800 jobs and stop making most home loans after regulators concluded it was no longer "well capitalized." The... [more]
IndyMac Stops New Loans, to Cut 3,800 Jobs Topics:Subprime Lending | Credit | Mortgages Sectors:Financial Services Companies:IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.By Reuters | 08 Jul 2008 | 06:07 AM ET Font size: IndyMac Bancorp, one of the largest U.S. mortgage lenders, said on Monday it will eliminate 3,800 jobs and stop making most home loans after regulators concluded it was no longer "well capitalized." The job cuts affect 53 percent of the lender's 7,200-person work force over the next couple of months, reducing operating expenses by 60 percent, Chief Executive Michael Perry said in a letter to shareholders and employees. They are in addition to about 2,700 cuts already made this year. Perry said regulators directed the company to follow a new business plan, but IndyMac does not expect to raise capital "until there is more stability and less uncertainty in the housing and mortgage markets." IndyMac IndyMac Bancorp IncNDE 0.71 UNCH 0 NYSE Arca Quote | Chart | News | Profile [NDE 0.71 --- UNCH (0) ] said it will no longer accept most applications on retail and wholesale mortgages but will honor rate-locked loan commitments. It plans to focus on its mortgage servicing unit, its 33-branch southern California thrift with $18 billion of deposits and its Financial Freedom reverse mortgage unit. The company was once one of the fastest-growing U.S. mortgage lenders, specializing in "Alt-A" home loans that often go to people who cannot document income or assets. It made $77 billion of mortgage loans in 2007, ranking ninth with a 3.2 percent share, according to the Inside Mortgage Finance newsletter. But credit problems caused IndyMac's ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets to increase sixfold to 6.51 percent in the year ended March 31. The company expects its remaining units to make $5 billion to $10 billion of loans annually. Shares of IndyMac are down 98 percent in the last year. "IndyMac still has a sizable book of poorly performing loans. That's its biggest problem," said Jason Arnold, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets in San Francisco. "Our best guess is that IndyMac winds up in receivership." RELATED LINKS Freddie, Fannie Fall on Capital Woes Loan Pains Turned Site Into a Hit Survey Shows Risk of UK Recession B&B Falls as Concerns Persist IndyMac expects its second-quarter loss to be larger than the $184.2 million, or $2.27 per share, it lost in the first quarter. Analysts on average expect a loss of 96 cents per share, according to Reuters Estimates. IndyMac lost $896 million in the nine months ending March 31. Perry said he also asked IndyMac's board to halve his base salary, which is capped at $1 million. He was unavailable for comment, spokesman Grove Nichols said. IndyMac is the largest independent, publicly traded U.S. mortgage company, following last week's roughly $2.5 billion purchase of Countrywide Financial by Bank of America BANK OF AMERICA CORP NEWBAC 21.53 UNCH 0 NYSE Quote | Chart | News | Profile [BAC 21.53 --- UNCH (0) ] . It joins more than 100 mortgage companies to curtail lending or go bankrupt since the start of 2007. Caught Up in Mortgage Boom IndyMac in the second half of 2007 refocused on making smaller, safer loans that it could sell to government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae FANNIE MAEFNM 15.74 UNCH 0 NYSE Quote | Chart | News | Profile [FNM 15.74 --- UNCH (0) ] and Freddie Mac FREDDIE MACFRE 11.91 UNCH 0 NYSE Quote | Chart | News | Profile [FRE 11.91 --- UNCH (0) ]. While IndyMac typically sold many loans it made, the change came too late for it to avoid the disappearance of the market for most nontraditional home loans. "IndyMac had been a well-regarded player in mortgages but given how the market is, it may be easier to restart such a business in the future than maintain one now," said Keith Gumbinger, vice president of HSH Associates, a Pompton Plains, New Jersey-based mortgage information publisher. A June 30 report by the nonprofit Center for Responsible Lending said IndyMac, like many rivals, got caught up in "the overheated atmosphere of the mortgage boom" by making too many unsuitable loans in the quest for profit. Pasadena, California-based IndyMac said it suffered a mini bank run on June 27 and 28 as customers withdrew about $100 million of deposits. The withdrawals came after Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat who chairs the Joint Economic Committee, wrote to banking regulators that IndyMac could fail. IndyMac said on June 30 Schumer's concerns created the "wrong impression." Reverse mortgages let people, mainly 62 years and up, borrow against equity in their homes. Advances are not taxable and loans typically need not be repaid during homeowners' lifetimes. IndyMac shares closed up 4 cents at 71 cents, New York Stock Exchange data show. The company announced the cutbacks after U.S. markets closed. I can hear it already, what does this have to do with NYC RE. Well if you can't see the significance then I'm sorry. I thought we moved on to the recovery phase. [less]
Add Your Comment
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
Most popular
-
30 Comments
-
23 Comments
-
23 Comments
-
52 Comments
-
17 Comments
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
dco - do you haver any value to add or can all you do is copy and paste obvious data points?
We know the economy is in bad shape. Its obvious. Pointing out the obvious doesnt make you smart.
Why dont you tell us how one can make money in todays real estate market.
You offer all bad news and zero insight.
petrfit - "Why don't you tell us how one can make money in today's real estate market". No problem. It's actually simple and everyone can do it. Don't buy in this market, it's much to early and the downside for risk is 99.9%. Please read that again. I said it's "much to early". What I didn't say was that it will be forever. Someday in the future, when prices correct and it's financially beneficial to buy rather then rent, it will be a good time to buy again.
I'm glad you asked "do you have any value to add or can all you do is copy and paste obvious data points"? The truth is I have given many reasons for my predictions based on various market indicators. During which several members of a "crew" (I just like that word) have criticized me as not being insightful or knowledgeable of the markets both NYC RE and Wall street. So I have decided that since my analysis has been downgraded to junk (Much like Toll Brothers) by the crew. I have decided to just post information that is written by another that I happen to agree with and supports my analysis. This way when disagreeing with me they will also be insinuating that the publisher of the information also has Junk status and can't be relied upon. I may as well take someone down with me. LOL
Of course as you pointed out it appears that everything I post is negative and you would be 100% correct. I see nothing good at all occurring at this point regarding both WS and RE. It's just going to get much worse. I know how people feel about that but it's just my opinion and seems to be the one being supported everyday. And yes someday things will get better, however today is not that day.
dco - what exactly are your economics or real estate market qualifications? You have no intelligent analysis. You spew baseless opinions based on news bites or internet stories. You obviously have to educational or analytical experience in these areas. Stop pretending to be something you are not.
petrfitz- Take a look at the post above by LICComment. Like I said and it only took 28 minutes.
You see I'm also good at predicting human behavior.
hmm yeah you are "insightful" by predicting tough economic times. You must be the only one thinking this.
Also your "dont buy in this market advice" is the same as all the doom and gloomers are saying. It is also not a way of making money. It is a way of losing money - on rent on lost opportunity.
There is the most opportunity in the RE market than there has even been - and you are missing it.
petrfitz- Saving money is not exactly losing money. Perhaps your mother never taught you this. My doom and gloom has saved me a lot of money over the months and when the risk shifts to positive I'll make even move when the opportunity presents itself. It's the lack of understanding risk that caused this mess in the first place. You have to manage risk. By answering this question you can see how you stand in this market.
Is NYC RE more likely to decline in the next 12 months or increase? Just answer that question and you will know if you are taking on more risk then the market is indicating.
I've been "losing" so much money buying milk all these years...might as well buy a cow, right?
Nevermind the transaction costs, the financing costs, the tying up of a down payment, the maintenance costs, the taxes and the general odor. Dammit, I'm going to buy that cow, no matter the price! I'd be a fool to do otherwise! Could I wait until cow prices become more rational relative to incomes and other facets of the economic picture? Sure, but why would I want to do that? I can buy that cow today!
"There is the most opportunity in the RE market than there has even been"
Indeed! There are many opportunities to lose your money in the market right now. You just have to pick how you want to lose it and how fast, that is the hard part.
east_cider- I say buy the cow and sell the steaks for twice what you paid for the cow.
i agree with LIC's commnent about you dco but totally disagree with LIC's RNC toe the line even thought it will bring about your on destruction mentality.
"There is the most opportunity in the RE market than there has even been"
petrfitz, I'm very interested to hear about these opportunities... specifically, how these opportunities are the "most than there has even been".
you sure that it's the "most than there has even been"? as in, better opportunities than let's say 2003?
please let us in on the secret!
east_cider, mutual funds and asset managers have been forced to report returns net of fees after years of ripping off clients. Maybe one day the real estate market will do the same. Imagine if a realator had to produce a chart showing how long it would take for a buyer to break even after taxes and transaction costs using a scale of average annual returns say 4%, 6%, 8%? With the Next Best Alternative Investment being the risk free (fed funds) rate?
Maybe real estate wouldn't be such a casino. I know there are people who work in real estate for a living. They have a built in intuition for what will make money and what will not. The vast majority of the people need to understand that a 15% increase in home value does guarantee you made money.
IndyMac only made Alt A loans. Not like there's amarket for those right now.
totallyanonymous- Not really the point but I guess that's the spin.
I wasn't spinning anything guy, I am stating a fact. There is no secondary market for subprime or Alt A loans right now so its a no brainer that an indymac is exiting the market.
totally anonymous, exiting a market and firing half of your staff are two different things. Analyst price target is $0.
And I meant to say "a 15% increase in home value does NOT guarantee you made money".
the market they were in was doomed to failure from the get go. we are back to traditional mortgages for the foreseeable future, thus static to stagnant re growth....until the next market frenzy.
An Alt A mortgage provider in California folds and this is dco's evidence that all financing everywhere has dried up and the market in NYC will crash 50% or more. Genius.
MMAfia - yes better opportunity than 2003 - less competition, more inventory to choose from.
You dont get it do you? That is why you are a renter.
"MMAfia - yes better opportunity than 2003 less competition, more inventory to choose from"
BUT petrfitz, the probability of appreciation was much higher back in 2003 than it is now- that powerful appreciation rate back then would entirely eclipse your "less competition, more inventory" analysis, not to mention the abundance of EASY MONEY available back in 2003.
Sorry- I simply do not believe that now is the BEST TIME EVER as you posted above to make money in RE.
Call me crazy, but that's my opinion.
Also, I want to clarify that I do believe it is still *possible* to make money in Manhattan RE right now.
I just don't agree with petrfitz's idea that now is the best time EVER as he posted and defended.
Apparently, I don't get "it". Can someone else who gets "it" explain to me why now is the best time EVER?
Because the NYC RE Marketing Machine says it the best time ever. Who are you to question them.