Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

If You Can Demonstrate Market Movement With Comps: Upper West Side Edition

Started by West81st
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008
Discussion about
As discussed on the original "IFYCDMMWC" thread, please post comp sets on the relevant neighborhood-specific thread. This discussion is for UPPER WEST SIDE properties.
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

Sorry - make that 9.2% below 2005 basis.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 15 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

23 West 73rd - combined unit 1206/07 bought as market was heading towards peak. Was a gut renovation, but it would seems that seller still made a profit even after market tanked (though not as much as they thought they would, judging by initial asking price).

02/27/2007 #1206 $1,900,00005/28/2009
Previously Listed by Prudential Elliman at $4,500,000.
07/18/2009 Prudential Elliman Listing is no longer available. Last priced at $3,999,000.
08/21/2009 Previously Listed by Carol E Levy at $3,750,000.
11/06/2009 Delisted by Carol E Levy. Last priced at $3,750,000.
11/21/2009 Listed by Corcoran at $3,695,000.
12/28/2009 Listing entered contract.
03/04/2010 Listing sold.
03/04/2010 Sale recorded for $3,615,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 15 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

Sorry for the bad cut and paste in first line -

Sold 02/27/2007 #1206/07 $1,900,000
5/28/2009 Previously Listed by Prudential Elliman at $4,500,000

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

ph: the owner of that unit posted on the board (gabrielle904?) Good for her. You have to know your product. I have passed up on combos at 23W73 (and profits) a few times because I don't get why people would pay a huge premium to live there. Not to belittle her profits, but given the transaction costs & reno costs, it wasn't quite a slam-dunk. Sure, she made 500k+ but could have gone the other way too.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 15 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

10023 - yes, I recognized the sale and poster when it went into contract a while ago. Don't know how much she put in as equity (downpayment plus renovation costs?) but as a return on equity probably looks pretty good considering the meltdown over that time period from initial purchase to sale.

I am usually not a fan of hotels that have been converted to apartments because the layouts are not always that good (1 Fifth mystifies me totally), but here it might have been the "mint" factor, the terrace, and the location right off CP.

And back to the Chatham, I think if you had been on the East Side at the time, you would have liked that building and the layouts of the larger units, though they seem to have been at a higher price point than the condo you liked on W72.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Sure, only because with hindsight, she made a good profit. Could easily have gone the other way around. She got lucky, found a buyer at 3.6m. Just as likely (maybe not, maybe 23W73 is that desirable) to have sold for 2.9m or less, which was probably her break-even mark.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

And she carried it for 3 years, don't know what her carrying costs were, but say 300k min. She could have been all-cash, but capital is never free.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 15 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

come on 10023 - give her her due - maybe she saw the potential in the unit and took the risk others (such as you and I) would not have made. And do you really think she spent a million on the renovation? The place is not huge, and it didn't look as if she gold plated everything. From her reno posts I would say she was pretty much on top of things cost-wise.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

1.9m + 300k carrying costs -> 2.2m (ballpark 300k, probably higher)
500k reno -> 2.7m

Transaction costs - at least 10% in and out. To break even on a 500k reno, she needed to have sold at 2.9 or more.

I've tried to make $ flipping NYC real estate and the transaction costs + carrying costs kill you. Unless you pay all cash.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

It's possible that it was a 200k reno, but I've also underestimated transaction costs, so I don't see how it was an easily-predictable profit.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

15 West 84th Street #3B: Same unit resale, down just 3.5% from 2007.
08/12/2006 Previously Listed by Prudential Elliman at $895,000.
03/13/2007 Prudential Elliman Listing sold. Last priced at $849,000.
06/07/2007 Previous Sale recorded for $829,000.
11/04/2009 Listed by Citi-Habitats at $829,000.
12/18/2009 Price decreased by 2% to $810,000.
01/20/2010 Listing entered contract.
04/08/2010 Sale recorded for $800,000.
The buyers owned their previous home on East 91st, so they don't qualify for the $8K tax credit despite the $800K purchase price. They might get the $6500 credit if they meet the other requirements.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by JohnDoe
over 15 years ago
Posts: 449
Member since: Apr 2007

hmm...3.5% seems like a remarkably small decline from a close to peak price. West81st, do you think the buyers overpaid, or is this a sign of the market coming back?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

JohnDoe: That price point on the UWS has held up reasonably well throughout the dip, and seems to have rebounded a bit in recent months. With regard to this particular apartment, it's hard to tell what improvements the sellers might have made during the three years they owned the place. Probably nothing dramatic, but on an $800K apartment, it doesn't take much to swing the percentage increase/decrease by several points.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mattconn
over 15 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Mar 2009

West 81st: You mentioned 514 WEA 10A as a notable sale at $1,037,500. It's now recorded as 1,101,012. Why would the closing price change, and is that now evidence of a bounce over 7A?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

#10A's share allocation is about 20% higher than #7A's, so I wouldn't call a 10% price premium a bounce. Clearly, the amended price makes the trade less significant as evidence of further weakening. At $1.0375MM, #10A represented a substantial step down from the October 2009 sale of #11A for $1.15MM. At $1.1MM, #10A doesn't suggest much movement in either direction.

With regard to why the closing price changed on #10A, the ACRIS filing doesn't provide any clues that I can see.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

490 West End Avenue #10D: Same-unit resale of a classic seven in a handsome (if somewhat faded), prime UWS pre-war coop. Closed 19.3% below 2007 basis. January 2010 contract.
04/19/2007 Listed by Corcoran at $2,895,000.
05/21/2007 Listing entered contract.
07/19/2007 Sale recorded for $2,880,000.
03/12/2009 Listed by Jeff Weisbord Real Estate at $2,595,000.
06/07/2009 Price decreased by 5% to $2,475,000.
01/31/2010 Listing entered contract.
04/08/2010 Sale recorded for $2,325,000.
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/391368-coop-490-west-end-avenue-upper-west-side-new-york
The sevens at 490 WEA are not especially generous, and the "D" line lacks views or a true master; so this may be an example of flawed product getting hit harder than properties with no obvious warts.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

Actually, #10D clears the adjacent building, so that's one wart it doesn't share with lower apartments in the line.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Is this more painful than a tattoo?

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/392547-coop-565-west-end-avenue-upper-west-side-new-york

Sold for 2.3ish in '08.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 15 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

nyc10023 - maybe the apartment has a curse on it? Gremlins? Skeletons in the closet? The people who bought it for $2,350,000 in 2/08 sold it 8 10/08 for $2,010,000 - heck of a loss back in those heady times. Definitely painful for those most recent sellers.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

I'll tell you when I see the final. Hanging around for 9 months..... Lmao. $2.3mm to $1.6mm, I hope the sellers make $800k/yr, only three yrs of savings. Now if they only make $400k/yr... More like 9 yrs. Diff=>. Retiring at 50 or 56. Ie with con-Viagra or non-Viagra. Enjoy.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Ph41: the buyers in '08 found another apt they liked better at 290WEA (14A). 8-room(?) I don't think they were too concerned about 300k + transaction losses.

The original pics for the 2.35 listing showed the yellow Art Deco baths. I wouldn't install tilework like that, but would certainly not rip out.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Correction - they didn't buy 14A, they hung on to it. Original UCC mid-90s.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Same-plan G and K lines at http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/the-gloucester

04/20/2010 .#9K $585,000
02/22/2010 #14G $590,000
08/04/2009 #10G $600,000
08/04/2009 #11G $550,000
06/18/2008 .#2G $625,000
07/26/2007 .#4G $615,000
07/05/2007 #14G $665,000
11/09/2006 #11G $570,000
05/05/2006 .#7G $579,000
11/30/2004 #12G $467,000

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

more pain on the boulevard. initial purchasers did OK.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/507177-condo-240-riverside-blvd-lincoln-square-new-york
07/26/2005Previous Sale recorded for $1,000,430.
08/24/2005Previous Sale recorded for $1,450,000.
11/20/2008Previously Listed by Corcoran at $1,400,000.
01/30/2009Delisted temporarily by Corcoran.
04/02/2010Listed in StreetEasy, already in contract, by Corcoran at $1,100,000.
04/03/2010Listing sold.
04/21/2010Sale recorded for $1,100,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

333 West End Avenue #9B: Same-unit resale of a renovated seven-into-five. Closed 12.5% below 2007 basis, but 27% above 2004 sale. Timing of renovations was likely between the two previous sales; the 2004 seller was "Estate of Selma Stricof" and the 2007 listing says "newly renovated".
06/01/2004 Previous Sale recorded for $2,200,000.
04/20/2007 Previously Listed by Stribling at $3,200,000.
09/06/2007 Previous Sale recorded for $3,200,000.
12/18/2009 Listed by Halstead Property at $2,750,000.
12/31/2009 Listing entered contract.
04/28/2010 Sale recorded for $2,800,000.
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/484833-coop-333-west-end-avenue-upper-west-side-new-york

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

245 West 99th Street (Ariel West) "A" line: The sale of #8A appears notable for two reasons: the continued price erosion during a period when the market was supposed to have experienced a bounce, and a fairly decisive break below pre-construction pricing.
-------- Recorded Sales -------- | ---------- Previous Listings ----------
04/28/2010 # 8A $2,467,500 -21.0% | . $3,125,000 Sold 4 beds 3 baths 2,349 ft²
01/22/2010 # 6A $2,647,450 -15.9% |↑ $3,150,000 Sold 4 beds 3 baths 2,349 ft²
08/19/2008 # 5A $2,900,000 - 1.4% |↑ $2,940,000 Sold 4 beds 3 baths 2,349 ft²
04/29/2008 #16A $3,309,312 + 1.8% |↑ $3,250,000 Sold 4 beds 3 baths 2,349 ft²
03/14/2008 #11A $2,913,559 ......... |
01/09/2008 # 7A $2,763,581 ......... |
12/20/2007 # 4A $2,606,720 ......... |
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/ariel-west?show_all=true

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walterh7
over 15 years ago
Posts: 383
Member since: Dec 2006

W81...re Ariel West.... its now an under-water habitat. Maybe they should re-name it Atlantis!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

There are some strange transactions at Ariel W. 3AC was on the market for 4.9m, then dropped to 3.9ishm, then taken (?) off market. The sellers bought it all cash for 4.2m.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bela
over 15 years ago
Posts: 183
Member since: Jul 2008

370 riverside drive apartment 7A sold for 1.2M which is way below 4A which sold 11/20/2008(right after lehman) for 1,686,250

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by roomwithaview
over 15 years ago
Posts: 15
Member since: Sep 2009

@ bela
Where do you see 1.2M as the closing price for 7A?
SE does not show the amount paid on this sal.
It does show $1.2 paid in 9/09 for 9E, with an asking price of $1.295

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

136 West 75th Street #4B: Fast sale, 8.6% below 2005 basis.
10/28/2005 Previous Sale recorded for $930,150.
03/01/2010 Listed by Prudential Elliman at $910,000.
03/08/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/03/2010 Sale recorded for $850,000.
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/499440-coop-136-west-75th-street-upper-west-side-new-york

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

Dollar cost averaging, Ariel East style:
-------- Recorded Sales -------- | ---------- Previous Listings ----------
05/11/2010 #22A $2,036,500 -11.5% |↑ $2,300,000 Sold 3 beds 2 baths 1,617 ft²
12/20/2007 #23A $2,031,408 - 1.1% |↑ $2,055,000 Sold 3 beds 2 baths 1,648 ft²
Same buyer. Basically identical apartments, except 22A has a 243ft² terrace. (I think it used to be the Sales Office.)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Nicely-done park-view 1/1.5, down 11.5% from 2007: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/482380-coop-80-central-park-west-lincoln-square-new-york and http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/60972-coop-80-central-park-west-lincoln-square-new-york

01/05/2007 Listed by Corcoran at $1,550,000.
01/20/2007 Listing entered contract.
05/03/2007 Sale recorded for $1,525,000.
12/04/2009 Listed by Brown Harris Stevens at $1,399,000.
01/21/2010 Price decreased by 4% to $1,350,000.
02/10/2010 Listing entered contract.
04/11/2010 Listing is no longer available.
04/12/2010 Re-listed by Brown Harris Stevens.
04/13/2010 Listing entered contract.
04/21/2010 Sale recorded for $1,350,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

327 Central Park West #2B: Renovated and reconfigured six with park views from LR and MBR. Closed 14.5% below late 2005 contract/early 2006 closing.
02/10/2006 Previous Sale recorded for $2,925,000.
02/18/2010 Listed by Corcoran at $2,595,000.
03/18/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/13/2010 Sale recorded for $2,500,000.
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/496916-condo-327-central-park-west-upper-west-side-new-york

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

2/2 in "fair" condition: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/489593-coop-263-west-end-avenue-upper-west-side-new-york

01/16/2010 Listed by Corcoran at $849,000.
01/28/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/14/2010 Sale recorded for $849,000.

The same-line apartments downstairs:

06/01/2008 #8G $1,222,500
10/23/2006 #2G $1,140,000
05/04/2005 #7G ...$995,000
07/12/2004 #2G ...$850,000

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

2/2.5 condo, flat from 2007: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/493048-condo-255-west-85th-street-upper-west-side-new-york

01/26/1996 Sale recorded for $374,500. (ACRIS)
04/25/2002 Sale recorded for $775,000. (ACRIS)
03/20/2007 Previously Listed by Stribling at $1,395,000.
07/03/2007 Stribling Listing sold. Last priced at $1,250,000.
09/24/2007 Sale recorded for $1,250,000. (As 6C)
02/12/2009 Previously Listed by Prudential Elliman at $1,499,000.
06/30/2009 Prudential Elliman Listing is no longer available. Last priced at $1,435,000.
01/30/2010 Listed by Brown Harris Stevens at $1,299,999.
03/27/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/17/2010 Sale recorded for $1,300,000. (As 6C)

Multiple bids, unless buyer just threw in the extra dollar.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/295040-coop-305-west-86th-street-upper-west-side-new-york

06/21/2005Previous Sale recorded for $589,000.
06/14/2008Listed by Citi-Habitats at $730,000.
07/28/2008Price decreased by 4% to $699,000.
09/23/2008Price decreased by 6% to $660,000.
10/29/2008Price decreased by 2% to $647,000.
12/31/2008Listing is no longer available.
02/27/2009Later Listed by CBHK at $599,000.
06/08/2009CBHK Listing is no longer available. Last priced at $549,000.
06/29/2009Later Listed by Corcoran at $525,000.
03/04/2010Corcoran Listing entered contract. Last priced at $499,000.
05/11/2010Sale recorded for $475,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

8D sold for $2,595,000 in 10/05; 5D for $2,387,000 in 03/05. no indication of condition. this one sold quickly for more than asking.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/495860-coop-101-central-park-west-lincoln-square-new-york

02/12/2010Listed by Warburg at $2,400,000.
03/02/2010Listing entered contract.
05/19/2010Listing sold.
05/19/2010Sale recorded for $2,500,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

the renovations look recent to me.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/475396-coop-40-west-77th-street-upper-west-side-new-york

10/20/2005Previous Sale recorded for $750,000.
10/31/2009Listed by Corcoran at $795,000.
12/11/2009Listing entered contract.
05/18/2010Listing sold.
05/18/2010Sale recorded for $760,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mitchigas
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Jan 2010

i am new to this site and live in 500 wea condo. how are the values here holding up?no recent sales that i know about.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Last year there were only the three you see at http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/500-west-end-avenue-new_york

In 2007 and 2008 there quite a few, notably 5C and 8C for low $5,000,000s, and a bunch of smaller sponsor sales.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Also last year, the sponsor sold the 27 units it still held in a bulk sale, for $6,100,000. Since then the new owner has sold one of them, 7E for $905,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mitchigas
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Jan 2010

who knows anything credible about apthorp? a friend of mine signed contract an apt there for 1300/sqft and now they sent him a letter that they are soon ready to close.AG cleared with stips. is this a disaster waiting to happen? i was actually hoping it would not go thru, cause i thought only headaches for him. now i would like him to make some $ and run.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

I've been watching for the condo declaration and plans to be filed. Nothing yet. Once filed, those in contract can start to close.

Back to 500 WEA and GrD that just closed for $2,800,000. Sellers bought it for $3,182,031 (taxes included) from the sponsor in June 2006. Don't know who paid for the work to combine the three apartments it started out as.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

NWT: I think you're missing a sale there - the 2006 sale was a resale, and 2005 from sponsor?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

For GrD? All I see in ACRIS are the same sales SE has, the $3.1M and the $2.8M. Lot 1103. IIRC the sponsor combined 1103/1104/1106 into 1103 shortly before the sale.

Then again, these annoying interruptions by work are making me scattered....

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mitchigas
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Jan 2010

all i am asking is 500 wea apt 8e is on market this week 1200 sq ft asking 1.6. is this reasonable price for current market?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

Gassy, only if you make it so.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Ah, I see the issue. I was confusing MAIS-D (1103 et al.) with 1-D (1111).

1-D sameish layout, size sold for 3.55m in 2006. Sponsor sale a few years before that - 2002?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

since 7E sold for $905k not that long ago i'd say no.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

But, you get to live in Tina Fey's old bldg. Surely that's worth something?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mitchigas
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Jan 2010

7e needed to be gutted, so it needs 2-300k of work

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

but $700k something?

actually mitchigas, that wasn't what you asked. if you want an answer to a specific question, it would behoove you to ask the specific question.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Mitchigas: no. They are pricing in a huge premium for the condo aspect. Similar vintage, size & type of building further south (arguably better location) can be had for 1k/sqft.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Ditto. From the plan it looks as if might have been an Edwardian 5, with the dining room turned into a bedroom. The 6x12 maid's room is nice to have, but it doesn't make up for the two bedrooms having to share the main bathroom. (Now watch it close at asking and prove us all wrong....)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mitchigas
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Jan 2010

i suspect it is not priced correctly, condo or not, period

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

A five-room up 24% from 2004: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/496616-coop-90-riverside-drive-upper-west-side-new-york

08/20/2004 Previous Sale recorded for $1,265,000.
02/17/2010 Listed by Halstead Property at $1,575,000.
03/12/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/24/2010 Sale recorded for $1,575,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mitchigas
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Jan 2010

thanks nwt, but that apt looks to be about 25%larger, tho co-op, not condo, other than good layout, must be something special

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

The 90 RSD post wasn't in reference to 500 WEA. You had the last word on that one.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

wasn't there a recent discussion of the maintenance costs for this building? it didn't seem to help matters here.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/466793-coop-2025-broadway-lincoln-square-new-york

12/03/2004Previous Sale recorded for $303,000.
09/28/2009Listed by Prudential Elliman at $395,000.
11/05/2009Price decreased by 7% to $369,000.
03/05/2010Listing sold.
05/13/2010Sale recorded for $300,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Just to put things in perspective, 29G at 2025 Broadway was asking 129k with no takers for a few months in late 2002.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

It took two years, but one of the dumpier apartments at 15CPW found a taker: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/485303-condo-15-central-park-west-lincoln-square-new-york

04/14/2008 Previous Sale recorded for $2,688,180.
10/04/2008 Previously Listed by Joanna Cutler Real Estate at $4,950,000.
09/19/2009 Joanna Cutler Real Estate Listing is no longer available. Last priced at $4,495,000.
11/19/2009 Previously Listed by Joanna Cutler Real Estate at $3,995,000.
12/22/2009 Delisted by Joanna Cutler Real Estate.
12/23/2009 Listed by Jay Schneider and Partners at $3,750,000.
03/20/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/17/2010 Sale recorded for $3,750,000.

The courtyard view and windowless not-a-legal-bedroom space give it the air of a FiDi office-building conversion.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walterh7
over 15 years ago
Posts: 383
Member since: Dec 2006

Here is a pretty interesting outcome. After a renovation which included a new kitchen (probably the biggest $$ in the reno), they came out close to flat after buying at THE very top. I'm pretty amazed this entirely view-less apartment didn't turn into a tragedy. It is in a great location which is most likely the only reason they didn't lose their shirts on this one.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/481850-coop-18-west-70th-street-lincoln-square-new-york

18 West 70th, Apt 7CDG
02/23/2007 Previous Sale recorded for $2,390,000.
12/03/2009 Listed by Gumley Haft Kleier at $2,550,000.
02/11/2010 Price decreased by 2% to $2,495,000.
05/21/2010 Sale recorded for $2,500,000

Houdini couldn't have done it any better!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

I saw that, they got VERY lucky. They caught the optimistic spring market this year. If they'd put it on the market last spring, they'd have gotten pretty bloodied.

Great location, no light (back faces 11 & 19W69), and there are no C7+s in the W67-W71 park block stretch except for 17W71.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by columbiacounty
over 15 years ago
Posts: 12708
Member since: Jan 2009

Assume that transaction costs were 8 percent or 200 k. Based on the description, the renovation was another 500 k so they lost an estimated 590 k or 19 percent of their investment...not counting carrying costs which had to be in excess of 100 k. My guess is that they are not feeling real lucky about this.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

I was just about to say that they feel crappy about it, but IMO, they are lucky. No way it would have been 3m.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Miette
over 15 years ago
Posts: 316
Member since: Jan 2009

CC: Agree they lost $s on the renovation but I doubt it was $500k. Look at the old Corcoran listing -- the place was already in decent shape (new kitchen, "triple mint," and all that -- not an estate sale). It's possible that the current sellers only redid the kitchen and the master bath and repainted. That could have been done for $100-150k.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by columbiacounty
over 15 years ago
Posts: 12708
Member since: Jan 2009

so you are assuming that this statement in the last listing is an out and out lie:

"The home underwent a complete renovation completed in April, 2008, which included the kitchen, all bathrooms, new hardwood floors, new built-ins and millwork in every room. "

from the earlier listing:

"This MINT prewar home, with rich details, offers an unusually large entertaining area. A chef's kitchen with furniture-quality cabinets is open to the loft-like living room/dining room area."

capitalizing "mint" seems pretty weak compared to complete renovation; and lets face it a so called chef's kitchen is also a questionable descriptor which would seem to be supported by the fact that the new owners completely ripped it out. Based on the many threads here on renovation costs, I reduced my estimate to $500 K assuming that there was some exaggeration in the description.

If, in fact, they actually did what they said, there is no doubt that it was substantially in excess of that. And by the way, even if all they did was the kitchen and master bath and general touchup, paint and plaster, that would have been at least $200-$250 K right there.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Small 2/2 condo, up 13.6% from 2004: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/507740-condo-130-west-79th-street-upper-west-side-new-york

10F 2010/05 $1,250,000
11F 2007/07 $1,375,000
10F 2004/12 $1,100,000
07F 2004/07 ...$605,000
12F 2004/05 ...$950,000
08F 2002/06 ...$725,000
10F 2000/10 ...$680,000
04F 2000/05 ...$640,000
06F 1998/08 ...$515,000
04F 1998/05 ...$425,000
06F 1997/03 ...$370,000
07F 1996/01 ...$345,000
09F 1993/09 ...$310,000
15F 1993/06 ...$325,000
04F 1992/12 ...$312,000
11F 1992/06 ...$327,000
05F 1991/08 ...$285,000
04F 1988/09 ...$332,000
07F 1988/08 ...$341,000
05F 1988/07 ...$345,000
12F 1988/06 ...$345,000
15F 1988/01 ...$380,500
09F 1987/12 ...$341,000
10F 1987/11 ...$346,000
06F 1987/10 ...$337,000
14F 1987/08 ...$314,500

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

342 West 85th Street #2B: Same unit resale of a 2BR/2BA duplex condo, 15.9% below 2006 basis.
09/19/2006 Previous Sale recorded for $1,115,000.
03/10/2009 Listed by Sotheby's International Realty, Inc. at $1,298,000.
04/14/2009 Price decreased by 6% to $1,225,000.
07/09/2009 Price decreased by 4% to $1,175,000.
07/28/2009 Listing is no longer available.
10/01/2009 Re-listed by Sotheby's International Realty, Inc..
10/01/2009 Price decreased by 2% to $1,150,000.
04/01/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/24/2010 Sale recorded for $937,500.
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/390888-condo-342-west-85th-street-upper-west-side-new-york
Likely short sale, since the 2006 purchase was done with only 10% down. #1A was a short sale too. Another low-floor unit might be headed in the same direction.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

2/2.5 condo, down 17.6% from 2006 and up 64.7% from 2003: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/487183-condo-15-west-63rd-street-lincoln-square-new-york

07/20/2001 Previous Sale recorded for $779,000. (ACRIS)
09/26/2001 Previous Sale recorded for $967,500. (ACRIS)
06/12/2003 Previous Sale recorded for $1,275,000. (ACRIS)
11/02/2006 Previous Sale recorded for $2,550,000.
06/23/2009 Previously Listed by Prudential Elliman at $2,649,000.
12/23/2009 Prudential Elliman Listing is no longer available. Last priced at $2,599,000.
01/06/2010 Listed by Corcoran at $2,450,000.
04/01/2010 Price decreased by 10% to $2,200,000.
05/12/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/27/2010 Sale recorded for $2,100,000.

The renovations were apparently done between the 2003 and 2006 sales.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

park laurel same-unit condo resale. 2/2.5. listing states that kitchen is new. don't know who did the bathrooms. what a tiny living room for over $2mm.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/487183-condo-15-west-63rd-street-lincoln-square-new-york

11/02/2006Previous Sale recorded for $2,550,000.
06/23/2009Previously Listed by Prudential Elliman at $2,649,000.
12/23/2009Prudential Elliman Listing is no longer available. Last priced at $2,599,000.
01/06/2010Listed by Corcoran at $2,450,000.
04/01/2010Price decreased by 10% to $2,200,000.
05/12/2010Listing entered contract.
05/27/2010Listing sold.
05/27/2010Sale recorded for $2,100,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 15 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

History
03/29/2006 Previous Sale recorded for $3,450,000.
03/11/2009 Previously Listed by Warburg at $4,250,000.
06/02/2009 Warburg Listing is no longer available. Last priced at $3,995,000.
01/14/2010 Listed by Warburg at $3,995,000.
02/18/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/18/2010 Listing sold.
05/18/2010 Sale recorded for $3,995,000. Mortgage Calculator

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
over 15 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

Sorry - 300 Central Park West 10B - looks like prices are not going down to 2001 - Sorry W67th

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

No link? I wonder how much those recent renovations cost them? 4 bathrooms, kitchen, pantry, lighting, etc. Can't be cheap to do a high-end reno of a large classic 7.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

Unfortunately, it's very difficult to isolate the value added by renovations, especially when the listing for the prior sale is unavailable.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Sometimes the building permits are useful, but nothing for this one except for $40K worth of "Interior renovation of existing class A apartment", pulled a few months after the 2006 sale.

Lack of plumbing permits suggests just retiling, with no fixtures moved.

It looks like a lot more than $40K to me, yet nothing like $500K, but I don't know from these things.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

Ph41. Enough about re. Let's talk about my 6 yo daughter. She loves to swim. In fact she beat this 7yo in a little swim race the last time we were In Maui. A little friendly touch the turtle statue and swim back affair.

Based on this race, I am refocusing her goals in life away from an education and into Olympic swim medals! Ain't I an awesome dad! Boy i can't wait until they interview me after she wins 10 golds in 2020!!!!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

Maybe she'll be on the wheaties box

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

Prefer corn flakes, but whoever pays me. :)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

Ph41. Beware of under the table horse trading to get a listing past a co-op board Flmao.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

277 West End Avenue #6D: Same-unit resale of a large classic six that was renovated and converted to a 3BR between sales. Although the cost of the renovation was lost in the resale, the end result isn't terrible.
12/31/2007 Previous Sale recorded for $2,010,836.
11/19/2009 Listed by Corcoran at $2,395,000.
12/11/2009 Price decreased by 4% to $2,295,000.
12/24/2009 Price decreased by 4% to $2,195,000.
04/08/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/27/2010 Sale recorded for $2,100,000.
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/479717-coop-277-west-end-avenue-upper-west-side-new-york

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

270 West End Avenue #10E: Same-unit resale of a large 5 / small 6 in a prime coop where high maintenance seems to have steepened the decline from peak. Closed 10.7% below early 2005 basis.
03/02/2005 Previous Sale recorded for $1,400,000.
10/08/2009 Listed by Halstead Property at $1,449,000.
11/05/2009 Price decreased by 4% to $1,395,000.
02/04/2010 Price decreased by 5% to $1,325,000.
03/19/2010 Listing entered contract.
05/24/2010 Sale recorded for $1,250,000.
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/469753-coop-270-west-end-avenue-upper-west-side-new-york
Corcoran currently has #4E, asking $1.395MM. Condition appears similar, and IIRC the six floors of elevation make a huge difference: #10E clears the townhouses on 73rd Street; #4E faces a wall.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

To underscore the difference between floors in the "E" line at 270 WEA: The seller of #10E previously owned in #3E. In 2005, she sold #3E for $1.05MM and bought #10E for $1.4MM. I think the footprints are the same, although it's possible that the third floor was divided differently.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

3E and 10E both have 440 shares, so I'd say you're correct that both have same footprint. That brick wall -- not pretty brick, either -- is 8-10 feet away.

The asking for 4E makes no sense.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walterh7
over 15 years ago
Posts: 383
Member since: Dec 2006

W81...your Streeteasy account must be better than mine because when I use your link, the 'sale recorded' line doesn't appear.

Streeteasy, can the admin explain this?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

Walterh7: The sale is in ACRIS. I added the line to the history, using SE's format for consistency.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by AvUWS
over 15 years ago
Posts: 839
Member since: Mar 2008

277 West End: Yeah they lost the renovation cost, but that must have been a pretty penny since they were moving a few walls. Had to have been north of $200,000. Still, a 10% loss from a purchase at market Peak is a heck of an accomplishment. Of course the cost might have been more. Others would know this better than me.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by raddoc
over 15 years ago
Posts: 166
Member since: Jun 2008

Re: "342 West 85th Street #2B: Same unit resale of a 2BR/2BA duplex condo, 15.9% below 2006 basis."

Owners were highly motivated, but not a bank related short sale. Sometimes you take your best first loss and move on to something else that depreciated even more to be where you want to be.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

Raddoc: True. Manhattan is one of the few markets where you find a significant number of owners who can afford to dump their properties at a 100%+ loss, write checks at the closing and then go buy something better. They're a minority, but they are out there and they do play a significant role.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Combo 4-bedroom 3.5-bath duplex resale, down 10% from 2007: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/495674-coop-514-west-end-avenue-upper-west-side-new-york

10/03/2007 Sale recorded for $4,093,797.
02/11/2010 Listed by Citi-Habitats at $3,975,000.
03/26/2010 Listing entered contract.
06/03/2010 Sale recorded for $3,675,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Quick sale and multiple bids, up 31% from 2004: http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/495550-condo-25-central-park-west-lincoln-square-new-york

06/01/1993 Previous Sale recorded for $177,500. (ACRIS)
12/04/1998 Previous Sale recorded for $365,000. (ACRIS)
04/26/2004 Previous Sale recorded for $760,000.
02/10/2010 Listed by Corcoran at $995,000.
03/12/2010 Listing entered contract.
06/03/2010 Listing sold.
06/03/2010 Sale recorded for $999,000.

The W and D (same plan) sales over the years are a good bust-boom-slide pattern.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sidelinesitter
over 15 years ago
Posts: 1596
Member since: Mar 2009

105 West 73rd, A line. The history follows the market up and down, including the recent sale of 5A slightly below the 2004 previous sale

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/490465-coop-105-west-73rd-street-upper-west-side-new-york
06/03/2010 #5A $580,000
10/09/2009 #7A $623,155
11/30/2005 #6A $710,000
09/30/2004 #3A $550,000
08/30/2004 #5A $593,039
05/21/2004 #4A $537,852

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 15 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

1+den/1.5 condo at the alfred. can't tell who did the reno but it doesn't look cheap.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/489394-condo-161-west-61st-street-lincoln-square-new-york

07/28/2005Previous Sale recorded for $925,000.
01/15/2010Listed by Corcoran at $985,000.
04/05/2010Listing entered contract.
06/04/2010Listing sold.
06/04/2010Sale recorded for $950,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

272 West 107th Street #11A: Same-unit re-sale of a 3BR/2.5 bath condo. Closed 10.1% below 2007 basis, 5.8% above original 2005 sponsor sale.
06/03/2005 Previous Sale recorded for $1,985,587.
04/26/2007 Previously Listed by Corcoran at $2,350,000.
08/21/2007 Corcoran Listing sold.
08/21/2007 Previous Sale recorded for $2,335,000.
02/10/2010 Listed by Brown Harris Stevens at $2,250,000.
04/09/2010 Listing entered contract.
06/07/2010 Sale recorded for $2,100,000.
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/495413-condo-272-west-107th-street-manhattan-valley-new-york

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

250 West 94th (Stanton) #8C closed in September 2009, but didn't show up in ACRIS until mid-April. It will be a horrendous comp for future sellers. Here's the history of the "C" line:
--------Recorded Sales----------|--------Previous Listings----------
09/02/2009 # 8C $1,175,000 - 9.3% |↓ $1,295,000 Sold 2 beds 2 baths 1,650 ft²
08/04/2009 #10C $1,375,000 - 1.4% |↓ $1,395,000 Sold 2 beds 2 baths
06/15/2009 #15C $1,387,500 -10.4% | . $1,549,000 Sold 3 beds 2 baths 1,650 ft²
07/07/2008 # 6C $2,040,000 - 0.5% | . $2,050,000 Sold 3 beds 2 baths 1,600 ft²

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/the-stanton-250-west-94-street-new_york

#6C had a nice face-lift with some quality finishes; not a particularly thorough renovation. (Note the window AC units, plus the clumsy division of the dining room that cut up floorboards and windows and left a chandelier wire draped across the room.) #15C, #10C and #8C all needed extensive work, although #10C showed reasonably well.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walterh7
over 15 years ago
Posts: 383
Member since: Dec 2006

40 West 77th. #6B Park block with unobstructed views of the Museum of Natural History. Clearly an 'A' location. Not CPW with a view of the park, but prime UWS nonetheless. And a classic 7 which go for a huge premium. Fully renovated. Move right in. All that and this owner is down 18 - 20% when all's said and done. 2005 price in 2010.

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/494492-coop-40-west-77th-street-upper-west-side-new-york

06/16/2005 Previous Sale recorded for $4,250,000.
08/16/2007 Previous Sale recorded for $4,750,000.
02/05/2010 Listed by Stribling at $4,300,000.
03/09/2010 Listing entered contract.
06/03/2010 Sale recorded for $4,300,000.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by seg
over 15 years ago
Posts: 229
Member since: Nov 2009

755 WEA B-Line, classic 6. Sold 6.2% higher than the peak same-line comp, but with 12 extra floors of elevation. Further caveat -- I don't know the condition of these various units.

Recorded Sales
06/04/2010 #16B $1,660,000 -3.8% $1,725,000 ↓ Sold 2 beds 2 baths
11/20/2009 #3B $1,250,000 -3.8% $1,299,000 Sold 2 beds 3 baths
10/17/2008 #2B $1,450,000 -6.5% $1,550,000 ↓ Sold 2 beds 2 baths 1,700 ft²
08/20/2008 #1B $1,472,500 -1.5% $1,495,000 ↓ Sold 3 beds 2 baths 1,600 ft²
02/21/2007 #4B $1,563,105 +4.2% $1,500,000 Sold 3 beds 2 baths 1,600 ft²
01/11/2006 #5B $1,460,000 -

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by seg
over 15 years ago
Posts: 229
Member since: Nov 2009
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 15 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

seg: Your instincts are right: the low-floor prior sales at 755 WEA ranged from "needs serious TLC" to "bring your wrecking ball."

A similar divergence is occurring at 145 West 86th, where #14B just sold quickly for $1.85MM ($55K above ask), while #10B draws little interest at $1.595MM. #14B needs some updating, but it has superior light and views, and showed far better.
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/145-west-86-street-new_york

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment