Skip Navigation

Apartment interior vs. building exterior

Started by msky
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 22
Member since: Apr 2013
Discussion about
How important is the building's exterior to you in an apartment purchase? Assuming that the apartment looks nice, but the building is not the most aesthetically pleasing. Thanks in advance.
Response by msky
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 22
Member since: Apr 2013

New to this forum, but would appreciate any thoughts on this, esp. from experienced uws manhattan dwellers

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Aaron2
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 1705
Member since: Mar 2012

When I'm inside, and looking out the window, I don't have to see it, so not very important. At the same time, if it's a really ugly building, you may not want to be seen walking into it. I'd be more concerned about how well it's maintained. If it's ugly because the paint is peeling, the replacement bricks don't match the originals very well, or replacement windows are a hash of styles, that may point to poor maintenance standards. If it's ugly, but beautifully maintained, I wouldn't be worried.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

Buildings are exactly the opposite of people: it's what's beautiful inside that counts.

There are about five buildings in NY over six stories tall that are not rather homely on the outside. That puts NY ahead of all other US cities, but you basically can't arrange your life around exterior façades.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

Not as important as the neighboring building exteriors.
Especially the ones opposite your window. :)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

It's that old saw about the Pompidou being the best building in all of Paris. Because you can't see it when you're in it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Boss_Tweed
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 287
Member since: Jul 2009

Actually that's a relatively new saw.

Guy de Maupassant, it is said, used to eat lunch at the restaurant in the Eiffel Tower because it was the one place in Paris from which one couldn't see the Eiffel Tower.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

It was probably the Bastille before that.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by BigPapi
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 95
Member since: Nov 2012

It's quite important actually , more subliminal than obvious

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Boss_Tweed
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 287
Member since: Jul 2009

... though I don't think they served much in the way of lunch at the Bastille....

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by msky
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 22
Member since: Apr 2013

This is helpful, thanks everyone!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lobster
over 12 years ago
Posts: 1147
Member since: May 2009
Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment