Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

"Alternate" floor plan doesn't work

Started by INTBuyer
about 5 years ago
Posts: 150
Member since: Apr 2013
Discussion about 155 Henry Street #3E
The "alternate" floor plan that is provided, which shows a two-bedroom configuration, does not work. Both "bedrooms" are too narrow (<8'0" in their smallest dimension) so neither meet the definition of a bedroom. The square footage of the smallest "bedroom," which is dimensioned as 7'10 " x 7'3", does not meet the 80 square foot requirement, either. Broker, See NYC Housing Maintenance Code §27–2074 Minimum room sizes. https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/buildings/pdf/HousingMaintenanceCode.pdf The "alternate" floor plan and the statement in the description that reads "easily converts to two bedroom" should both be removed from this listing.
Response by Krolik
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 1370
Member since: Oct 2020
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Obruni
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 26
Member since: Jul 2014

that closet space in the middle of the dining room doesn't make sense either.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by INTBuyer
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 150
Member since: Apr 2013

Definitively not, Krolik.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pier45
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 379
Member since: May 2009

The alternate floor plan is perfect for someone who wants to convert it to a 3-bed for student owner/roommate situation or large but frugal family. Just because it doesn't meet your needs doesn't mean it does not fit someone else's.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lrschober
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 159
Member since: Mar 2013

I don't think frugality is the question here, as much as what can legally be considered a bedroom by NYC based on room size. The proposed dimensions in that alternate floorplan would not meet the city's requirements.

I do agree that there are many families out there who are willing to make very small rooms work, and happily so. But advertising it as an additional bedroom when cannot legally be one, presumably in hopes of bolstering the sales price, is dishonest. There is no lifestyle value judgment there.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment