US Is Rushing to Get More Control Of Financial Giants
Started by stevejhx
over 17 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008
Discussion about
The White House and Congress are rushing to write legislation that allows the federal government to take over and unwind the businesses of a large financial institution—such as AIG or Citigroup —the way it now can with commercial banks, CNBC has learned. The regulatory authority—similar to the FDIC’s so-called bridge bank powers—was originally expected to be included in a broader reform package... [more]
The White House and Congress are rushing to write legislation that allows the federal government to take over and unwind the businesses of a large financial institution—such as AIG or Citigroup —the way it now can with commercial banks, CNBC has learned. The regulatory authority—similar to the FDIC’s so-called bridge bank powers—was originally expected to be included in a broader reform package addressing systemic risk. But now it's being crafted as stand-alone legislation in the wake of the public uproar over the AIG executive bonuses. http://www.cnbc.com/id/29386561 Make no mistake about it - this closes a big hole in the federal government's regulatory authority. AIG is going to be wound down & sold by the government, not left to its current management. Watch out hedge funds, bank holding companies, nonbank financial institutions: re-regulation is here to stay. It spells death to obscene bonuses based on short-term gains. Death to Manhattan real estate. The jig is up. [less]
Since when was citi not a commercial bank?
Part of citi is a commercial bank, part is not. Citigroup(partially) owns a brokerage, a consumer finance company, an insurance subsidiary. Citigroup itself is not a commercial bank - it is a bank holding company. Citibank is a commercial bank.
Very different.