Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Liberty Tower - 55 Liberty

Started by downtown1234
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 349
Member since: Nov 2007
Anybody have any thoughts on this building? Apartments seem nice; maintenance seems a little high. Other than that, seems like a nice building.
Response by NWT
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jordyn
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 820
Member since: Dec 2007

It's much nicer than any of the other co-op options in the Financial District. Maintenance does seem high given the relative lack of amenities (especially compared to all of the fancy condos in the neighborhood), but prices are pretty reasonable and seem to take this into account.

There's a huge variation in the quality of the units, so it can be hard to work out reasonable comps.

Location is pretty good within the Financial District--convenient to most subway lines as well as the cluster of grocery stores on John and Maiden Lane. In my opinion, also one of the more interesting conversions in that a fair amount of the building's original character was retained in the public spaces.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

Who remembers the 'batcave' on the top of this building?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by downtown1234
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 349
Member since: Nov 2007

Thanks jordyn and NWT

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

anyone know the status of 15B? price seems very cheap

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

I noticed the listing as well, Mowitz. Do any Fidi experts have color on that one?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

$ pst seems cheap but maint is very high for the price range. seems like it should be a $4MM apt, no?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Goldie
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 182
Member since: Apr 2007

I saw this unit a few years ago and now it looks more priced to sell. However, the maintenance isn't $6k, it's $8k/month, there's a note about how the seller is rebating $2k/month for 5 years ($120k) at closing. The layout isn't great for a family, but the huge space makes up for alot of shortcomings. There is great light to the south facing side. North and South views had a bit of a canyon feel. Renovation-wise, it needed some updating, particularly bathrooms (for my taste), but was entirely livable.

I was comparing to 27BC, which in hindsight was a steal due to combination of price and much better North and South views. But it needed alot more renovation, in my view.

One of the other negatives for the building was the entrance, which has alot of steps. At the time, with young kids and strollers, not great for us. There was a side entrance at street level, but it smelled awful, I think there was the garbage area there.

I love the building and the neighborhood and if you can swing the $100k/year in maintenance, I think you get alot for your money. Just remember the backflips you're going to have to do when you try and sell a place with that kind of maintenance and a 3% flip tax.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

The maint is only $1.75 psf...seems in-line with most properties in the city if you include real estate taxes. The apartment is dated, but it seems like the renovation was top of the line when it was done about 15 years ago

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

Compared to 27BC, 15B is around double the space. The 2008 listing had maintenance at $6K, double the maintenance listing for 27BC in 2009. I would imagine the story on maintenance is similar for 27BC -- $3K to $4K -- but I don't know.

Incorporating the $120K gimmick, this is now asking $3M. Double where 27BC went for double the space. Nicer condition, lesser views. Assuming maintenance is on par on a ppsf basis, 15B is arguably just as much of a steal as 27BC. If you can pick 15B up for $500K below current ask (which is not out of the question on this one, IMO), then 15B starts arguably looking better.

The problem with these apts, and I think with 15B particularly more so, is the target audience. With an ability to flush $100K a year down the toilet (which is a fair maintenance for 4500 sq ft by Manhattan standards) and $3M cash/borrowing ability, do I want to live in a non-prime apt in a non-prime neighborhood with non-prime light/views, etc.? Or would I rather live elsewhere ---after all, what am I going to do with 4500 sq ft?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

Goldie, I'm also surprised you think $8K a month for maintenance is high given 4500 sq ft. It seems like $8K maintenance is high given a $3M shopper, but what exactly are you expecting for 4500 sq ft.

Funny, if this were a $5-6M apt with no changes outside of asking price, I'm guessing a $8K maintenance would seem perfectly reasonable. It seems to have entered the price/maintenance death spiral. The price was too high for the space at $5M, but as they cut it to $3M to compensate, the maintenance "became" too high for the sale price.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>It seems to have entered the price/maintenance death spiral. The price was too high for the space at $5M, but as they cut it to $3M to compensate, the maintenance "became" too high for the sale price.

That's not a death spiral. Perhaps a conundrum, but not a death spiral.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

totally agree Inonada. in a few years when prices in this part of the city reach the $1200 psf level, $8-10k per month in maint will not seem extraordinary for a 4500 sf space. I would think the bigger issue with this unit is that the FIDI has yet to become a "family neighborhood" and has traditionally catered to wall street bachelors looking for a 1-2 bedroom. I think once Freedom Tower is complete and Conde Nast moves into the area, this unit will seem like a steal at $3MM

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

Conde Nast will save the financial district?
What happens to Times Square where they moved into a brand new building around 2000?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

Mowitz, I wouldn't call that a steal. The real steals are for rent. For example, I'd much rather take this at $14K a month:

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/29987-high-end-example-inonada-edition

This 15B apt costs you $8K a month, plus $3K a month to amortize transaction costs over 10 years. So $11K a month. Just there alone, I'd rather take the Beekman Place rental for an incremental $3K. Better location, great light, great views, infinitely more interesting space (MoMA vs. McMansion, no offense), 6 outdoor spaces, something quite special. A little smaller (15% accounting for outdoor space at 50%), but so what? Much superior space.

But guess what, that incremental $3K gets eaten up at 15B by insurance & upkeep & whatnot. So the monthlies for the two start hitting parity, but I strongly prefer the Beekman Place apt. And then comes the real kicker: you also need to pony up (or borrow) $3M for 15B. Even at a meager 4% cost of capital, that's $10K a month more.

So $24K a month for a slightly larger but otherwise inferior-in-every-way 15B vs. $14K for Beekman Place? Even if you think all will be great and appreciation will add 2% a year to 15B, you're still looking at $19K for the lesser apt vs $14K for the superior apt.

To me, the "steal" is the latter by far, somewhere approaching a factor of 2.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

I'm sorry, I have advanced education in math and logic, but I have no idea how to draw a conclusion with what you just posted.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rb345
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 1273
Member since: Jun 2009

55 Liberty went into foreclosure in the early 1990's. If memory serves me
correctly, it had a tremendous amount of debt, which might explain the high
maintenance

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

According to the "death spiral" theory, the apartments should spiral to zero and be worth nothing.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

where did you see that it went into foreclosure?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

15B is in contract? anyone know anything about this?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

A court case from 1993 mentions that it was "in foreclosure", but the co-op never lost title to the building. The then-lender, Guardian Life, may have lost money, but I can't tell.

The court case was interesting. In 1989 one Ittleson bought shares for an apartment from the architect/sponsor, Joseph Pell Lombardi, but then sued for fraud, whining that nobody told him a huge assessment for facade and roof repair was imminent.

Lombardi won. The court told Ittleson FU, that any reasonably intelligent person represented by counsel would've read the disclosures and engineer's report and known what he was getting into.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

Anyone know anything about the 4,500 sf unit in contract? Where will it close?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
over 13 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

$579 PSF....must be a record for Fidi

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 13 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

Thanks for circling back on this, Mowitz.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mikewalkerman
over 13 years ago
Posts: 25
Member since: Apr 2012

Does anyone know what's the story with 10C? Where will it close? Seems overpriced for the condition it's in. Looks like it hasn't been updated since the 80s.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
over 13 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

this building is going to be $1,000 psf in 3 yrs

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mikewalkerman
over 13 years ago
Posts: 25
Member since: Apr 2012

any thoughts/info on 10C?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mikewalkerman
about 13 years ago
Posts: 25
Member since: Apr 2012

Did this building suffer any flooding or other damage from Hurricane Sandy?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mikewalkerman
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 25
Member since: Apr 2012

Okay, happy to answer my own question. According to this listing, that answer is no: " This building was completely undamaged from recent storm."

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/rental/958514-coop-55-liberty-street-financial-district-new-york

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mowitz
almost 13 years ago
Posts: 13
Member since: Apr 2010

No damage during Sandy. Best co-op downtown. Its the last "under-the-radar" building where one can find a reasonably priced apartment in the area.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mikewalkerman
about 10 years ago
Posts: 25
Member since: Apr 2012

Moritz, I've been watching this building for a while and it looks like your prediction three years ago was spot on. Units in this building recently seem to be moving fast and trading above 1,000 sf (and often above ask). The market finally woke up to this fido secret. With all the development around this building and so many more people moving downtown, it could be going to $1,300/sf over the next couple years.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fieldschester
about 10 years ago
Posts: 3525
Member since: Jul 2013

who knew that this building was such a dog.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by maklo1421
about 8 years ago
Posts: 126
Member since: Dec 2010

Does anyone know why the maintenance in the building is so high? Is it due to high debt on the co-op mortgage?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 300_mercer
about 8 years ago
Posts: 10570
Member since: Feb 2007

maklo, I believe the taxes are very high and lower floor have less share of the maintenance relative to the square footage, which is not uncommon. Higher floors are screwed due to higher share allocation. The city keeps on increasing the taxes and many other coops are facing very high maintenance.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment